Re: Blackjack Counting and Comps
like I said before, counting cards to make money and/or reduce house edge, and maximizing comps are not necessarily correlated strategies. nowhere in Rubin's "Comp City" does the author suggest that you ramp your bets relative to the count. in fact, he says that casino countermeasures like shuffling up early are BENEFICIAL to the basic strategy flat bettor because it reduces the number of hands dealt per hour.
if you're normally a green chip player and you lose a few $200 big bets in a bad session when the count is high, was that free buffet or even a weekend room still worth it? if you were unlucky enough to blow a big stack in less than an hour (definitely possible if you're backcounting), will the computer even give you enough comp credit to offset the difference? probably not. and remember that floor personnel can only give discretionary freebies based on gross wagering handle, not actual win/loss. the simple math is, you may get 10x the comps for 10x the average bet, but you do NOT have 10x the best of it in terms of actual cash win rate. therefore, flat betting your maximum tolerable amount per hand with NO additional variance is, IMO, the optimal strategy in a place like AC where counting produces little or no long-term return in of itself.
for a lower BR requirement, you can grind $1 JoB VP, exploit cash back multiplier promotions, chase progressives, AND be seen in a more positive eye by the casino, all for about the same house edge as BJ. read "The Frugal Gambler" (2nd Ed.) by Jean Scott and "Video Poker - Optimal Play" by Dan Paymar. the Max Rubin book is slightly outdated since it was written before the mass computerization of players club progams.
|