#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 River Decision
Raise, fold to a 3-bet.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 River Decision
[ QUOTE ]
QQ is good enough that we must must must see a showdown. [/ QUOTE ] Is this your general philosophy or just for this particular hand? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 River Decision
I'm not a big fan of this "raise/fold to a 3-bet" line that I keep seeing given as advice on this forum. Villain could easily have JT, and if he's feeling frisky he could 3-bet you....you fold and then freak out when he shows you JT. I just like a call here, or if you want to raise, call the 3-bet. I will raise and fold to a re-raise occasionally when I feel it's the perfect spot for this play. This situation is not one of those.
Villain may have figured this to be a WA/WB line and played it like a 2+2-er, calling on the flop and turn and then betting the river, folding if raised. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 River Decision
[ QUOTE ]
I would just call, but I have no sack, and I take too many beats, with my luck the [censored] would table TT and scoop it up with his set. [/ QUOTE ] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 River Decision
just call it. If he's bluffing he won't call your raise. If he has a monster he'll 3 bet you.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 River Decision
[ QUOTE ]
89 is the only draw that made it and i see that villian has odds to peel the flop with his gutshot but i dont think he'd make the unprofitable turn call with it... [/ QUOTE ] 89 has a double belly buster, so it is open ended. I would raise and call. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 River Decision
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] QQ is good enough that we must must must see a showdown. [/ QUOTE ] Is this your general philosophy or just for this particular hand? [/ QUOTE ] Uh, I'm definitely not seeing a showdown with all my QQ hands [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] For this hand, it seemed prudent to see the showdown since Villain had been so passive, but I certainly wasn't sure enough to fold that he wasn't doing something wacky. bk |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 River Decision
I try to make it a pretty solid rule that seeing showdowns with Overpairs in a limit game is good.
C-Dog |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 River Decision
i think that bob makes a really good point about folding to the 3-bet, in this case the information gained isn't always that we're crushed and its an easy fold. thanks to donnie for pointing out that 89 could be a real possibility as its open. i'm now feeling that its a mix between calling and raising as it could've really been strength not wanting to be checked behind but the donks such an odd move. figure that the made straight would've c/r the river since you're always betting here. good hand-
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 River Decision
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think it's a raise/fold here unless villian is a total maniac then it's raise/call. [/ QUOTE ] I strongly disagree with this. QQ is good enough that we must must must see a showdown. I would be very surprised if others are advocating R/F here. FWIW my OP was basically to ask if people are raising here. Folding never entered my mind. [/ QUOTE ] Given a paired board and the action with the donk-bet on the river, what could a reasonable villian possibly 3-bet here that we beat? |
|
|