Terms & Conditions

Internet Magazine

Non–US new players
Get five 2+2 books


Order Books
Book Translations
Forum Login
 
 
Expand All   Collapse All

 Two Plus Two 
2+2 Magazine Forum
Special Sklansky Forum
2+2 Pokercast
About the Forums

 General Poker Discussion 
Beginners Questions
Books and Publications
Televised Poker
News, Views, and Gossip
Brick and Mortar
Home Poker
Beats, Brags, and Variance
Poker Theory
Poker Legislation

 Coaching/Training 
StoxPoker
DeucesCracked

 German Forums 
Poker Allgemein
Strategie: Holdem NL cash
Strategie: Sonstige
Internet/Online
BBV
Small Talk
German Poker News

 French Forums 
Forum francophone
Strategie
BBV (French)

 Limit Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes Limit
Medium Stakes Limit
Small Stakes Limit
Micro Stakes Limit
Mid-High Short-handed
Small Stakes Shorthanded
Limit––>NL

 PL/NL Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes
Medium Stakes
Small Stakes
Micro Stakes
Small-High Full Ring
Micro Full Ring

 Tournament Poker 
Small Stakes MTT
High Stakes MTT
MTT Community
STT Strategy
Tournament Circuit

 Other Poker 
Omaha/8
Omaha High
Stud
Heads Up Poker
Other Poker Games

 General Gambling 
Probability
Psychology
Sports Betting
Other Gambling Games
Entertainment Betting

 Internet Gambling 
Internet Gambling
Internet Bonuses
Affiliates/RakeBack
Software

 2+2 Communities 
Other Other Topics
The Lounge: Discussion+Review
El Diablo's General Discussion
BBV4Life

 Other Topics 
Golf
Sporting Events
Politics
Business, Finance, and Investing
Travel
Science, Math, and Philosophy
Health and Fitness
Student Life
Puzzles and Other Games
Video Games
Laughs or Links!
Computer Technical Help
Sponsored Support Forums
RakebackNetwork
RakeReduction.com
Other Links
Books
Authors
Abbreviations
Calendar
Order Books
Books by Others
Favorite Links
Feedback
Advertising Information
Home
Posting Hints
Privacy Notice
Forum Archives

The 2+2 Forums

Before using this Forum, please refer to the Terms and Conditions (Last modified: 2/26/2006)

Be sure to read the   Two Plus Two Internet Magazine

This is an archive. The main forums are here

These forums are read only.


 
UBB.threads™ Groupee, Inc.

2+2 Communities >> Other Other Topics

Pages: << 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | >> (show all)
fslexcduck
52s go all in


Reged: 01/15/05
Posts: 4531
Loc: brooklyn
Re: this chick is fat, yo [Re: prohornblower]
      #5864515 - 05/18/06 12:29 PM

Quote:

1) Why does this bother you so much? Seriously, so a bunch of 19 year old zit-faced nerds think a girl is fat. Who cares??
2) Your post won't really change anything. I appreciate it. But come on...this is OOT within 2p2. Cancer will be cured sooner.




i wasn't going to bother bringing this up, but most people have missed the point of my post. i was more concerned with the manner in which people express their opinions rather than that they express them. also that standards of fat here are quite umm horrifying. but mostly the first point.

as far as not having changed anything, to be honest, i think i already have.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Aloysius
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 03/05/04
Posts: 7338
Re: this chick is fat, yo [Re: fslexcduck]
      #5864596 - 05/18/06 12:36 PM

Hm - you should probably re-read your OP if that was the point you were attempting to drive home, as it's easy to see how it was missed. Your OP basically notes that OOT is misogynistic and you request male 2+2'ers show pics of themselves, to underscore how laughable in your eyes it is for 2+2'ers (who you describe in a lovely fashion) to rate women so harshly:

Quote:

ok OOT, this is my venting post. i realize by being a woman, i'm in a .5% minority, and i'm sure i will take heat for this post, but i really don't care.

this forum is one of the most misogynistic places i have ever had the pleasure of frequenting. most of it is in good fun, but it really gets out of hand sometimes. i could provide many comments and examples, but i'm sure most of you know what i'm talking about. but to be specific, i would like to explore one example, which is the frequent comments on women's weight.

just today, i have had the pleasure of reading three threads in which a woman was described as fat, or chubby, or whatever... you guys spend all day analyzing women to the slightest flaw, and laugh about it, when in reality most of you are either not socially aware or attractive enough to get with a woman with half of her "rating." who knows if i'm the only one, but i'm pretty sick of it.

i realize saying this will make nothing change, the misogyny and abusiveness will continue... as will the superficiality... fine. but hey, how about at least when you post a picture of some girl in relation to some story to rate her or whatever, you post a pic of yourself. or when you call some chick fat because she hasn't appeared in the latest playboy, post a pic of yourself and we'll see how you guys measure up. that way, while you're busy rating some girl and making fun of her, you can at least withstand the heat yourself. if you aren't man enough to do that at the very least, well then, i pity you.




-Al


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CopTHIS
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 01/28/06
Posts: 2223
Re: this chick is fat, yo [Re: fslexcduck]
      #5864665 - 05/18/06 12:42 PM

Am I the only one wondering whether the poster has big jugs?

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jaydub
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 12/30/04
Posts: 2055
Re: this chick is fat, yo [Re: CopTHIS]
      #5864700 - 05/18/06 12:45 PM

cop,

her pic is on page 6 or 7 and I hear she has a nice personality.

J


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ElaineMonster



Reged: 09/06/05
Posts: 1465
Loc: Las Vegas
Re: this chick is fat, yo [Re: MelchyBeau]
      #5864747 - 05/18/06 12:48 PM

Quote:

What does one do with a women's studies degree?




First, it may surprise you that not all universities have Women's Studies or Gender Studies departments. They're not as prolific as some of you assume. For example, Cal Poly doesn't have one, but UNLV does.

The UNLV Women's Studies department's goal is to produce activists.

The graduates work in a variety of fields and most are double majors. My classmates went on to work as social workers, nurse midwives, actors, journalists, lawyers, professors, scientists, etc.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
gorie
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 03/17/05
Posts: 4586
Loc: it's like a puzzle with pans, ...
Re: this chick is fat, yo [Re: Blarg]
      #5864749 - 05/18/06 12:48 PM

blarg,
um, i'm not fishing for compliments. you can think what you want about me. but i am not. compliments about my looks made by people who have only seen pictures of me that i selected for them to look at don't mean much to me. people don't really know what they're talking about. that doesn't mean i don't get sensitive about my looks either because obviously i do. i know what i look like.

just to be clear , i never said i thought people on this forum were mean to me. for the most part people have been positive toward me - i agree, i'm pretty well accepted. all i said is i don't like being used as an example of how 'respectful' people have been in response to female posters that have posted pictures. i just don't like it, ok ? that doesn't mean i have had an overwhelming negative response to my pictures at all. if you think that's what i feel you are misunderstanding me.

there are girls who haven't really had any negative things happen to them , where i feel i have, so maybe use them as examples if you need to. maybe i am 'exaggerating' the negativity by saying i have experienced it.

i am not saying i expect anything different. or that people have been unreasonable toward me. i just don't like being used as an example. it is simple. i'm pretty sure the only times i ever brought this up is when someone uses me as an example like this (this is the second time). it really doesn't matter anyway, i shouldn't have commented on it.

as i said earlier i know it could be much worse - i'm not complaining, don't get me wrong. and maybe that is what you guys are referring to ? i don't want to know.

anyway blarg i like you too but you should really just shut up about this now, thanks.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
daryn
Hit and run artist


Reged: 04/24/03
Posts: 18335
Loc: Boston
Re: this chick is fat, yo [Re: LittleOldLady]
      #5864894 - 05/18/06 12:59 PM

Quote:

Quote:

am I the only one who's shocked that elaine didn't take Mr. Miller's last name when they married? I mean, I totally didn't see that one coming.




Why would you be shocked? When I got married in 1968, women routinely took their husbands' names upon marriage, but shortly thereafter educated women largely stopped changing their names. My younger sister, for example, never changed her name. Most of my female colleagues and wives of male colleagues did not change their names. I can only think of one younger female colleague who did change her name. She is a Slavicist, and her maiden name was English. She happened to marry a man with a Slavic surname, and she changed because having a Slavic surname was a plus in getting a job. Frankly I would have been surprised if Elaine had changed her name.









Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TheMainEvent
Celebrity Psychic


Reged: 04/13/05
Posts: 4383
Loc: Recliner of Rage
Re: this chick is fat, yo [Re: fslexcduck]
      #5865058 - 05/18/06 01:10 PM

Quote:

also that standards of fat here are quite umm horrifying.




I think the standards of rating pictures on OOT are so high that they become a joke and people should know not to take them seriously.

A girl posts a picture and someone says she's fat and ugly, OK that hurts. Does it hurt as much when you realize someone probably said the same thing in a thread about Salma Hayak the day before?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tennenbaum
Scout


Reged: 04/11/06
Posts: 1964
Loc: MIA
Re: this chick is fat, yo [Re: TheMainEvent]
      #5865124 - 05/18/06 01:14 PM

Quote:

Quote:

also that standards of fat here are quite umm horrifying.




I think the standards of rating pictures on OOT are so high that they become a joke and people should know not to take them seriously.

A girl posts a picture and someone says she's fat and ugly, OK that hurts. Does it hurt as much when you realize someone probably said the same thing in a thread about Salma Hayak the day before?




Uh, this chick could totally lose at least 45lbs.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Dominic
Johnny 3-Legs


Reged: 06/16/04
Posts: 12772
Loc: Vegas
Re: this chick is fat, yo [Re: Tennenbaum]
      #5865386 - 05/18/06 01:32 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

also that standards of fat here are quite umm horrifying.




I think the standards of rating pictures on OOT are so high that they become a joke and people should know not to take them seriously.

A girl posts a picture and someone says she's fat and ugly, OK that hurts. Does it hurt as much when you realize someone probably said the same thing in a thread about Salma Hayak the day before?




Uh, this chick could totally lose at least 45lbs.





i agree. she's got a nice rack, though.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: << 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | >> (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 27 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Mat Sklansky, Commodus, NT!, Nick B., Mike Haven, mrkilla, Yeti 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 11680

Rate this topic

Jump to

contact us 2+2 Publishing

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Message Boards and Forums Directory

Pages provided by ConJelCo