Gigabet
addict
Reged: 10/03/04
Posts: 402
Loc: Iowa
|
|
This post is in response to Irieguys Post "The Difference Between Success and Failure." Here is the link http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=1822484&page=1&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=14&fpart=1
When I read Irieguys post I wasn't planning on responding, I rarely respond to posts, because most of the time I am the dissenter, and frankly, it isn't good for my long term financial situation. As I started reading the responses I soon felt obligated to respond. He is so close, but travelling in the wrong direction.
The wording he uses in the text lets me know where he is at on the "path," so to speak(the very beginning). Let me start with the words success and failure. These are words that mean such different things to each individual that to use them to label your accomplishments, or lackthereof, is setting yourself up for a long ardurous journey, that most won't finish. Success and failure are just ideas created by society to improperly judge others against ourselves. There are no successful people, or rather, using these words, I should say that there are no failures and everyone is a success.
Quote:
Everybody will eventually run worse than they thought was possible. The difference between a winner and a loser is that the latter thinks they do not deserve it.
This statement is truer than anyone can know(even though I think most of you do know, it just seems impossible for me to believe that someone else can understand). What he says about winners and losers though, will keep you from attaining a more complete game. There are no winners or losers, to think that, is to let yourself be affected by negative variance. If you are not in the positive for the day, then you therefore must be a loser, and so the downward spiral begins. All of those negative ideas must be eliminated from your mind, or you will not perform to your potential. The trick is recognizing these negative ideas, since there are so many and so commonplace in our society, it is a large task indeed to sort them out as real, or just ideas created by the masses. Our labels for winners and losers simply identify individuals who play the same game a different way. Just because one person doesn't achieve the same goal that I strive for, doesn't make that person a "loser." Everyone is the same, and everyone has the same potential, some just direct their energies in different directions. The sooner you can get that into your head and really believe it, the sooner you will start to have a real understanding of the game.
Quote:
I am beginning to realize that most people don't have the psychological fortitude or spiritual perspective to manage the vicissitudes of this game. I also believe that of the very small number of professional poker players who have been successful for more than a few years, most of them are actually quite lucky. I believe that there are many pros who will fail once they begin to experience average luck.
I really believe that everyone has the "psychological fortitude" to manage the vicissitudes of the game. It is simply a choice. A choice to change the way you think about results. Stop thinking in terms of winning as good and losing as bad. The two concepts should be grouped in your mind exactly the same. When God "blessed" man with shame, failure became a real entity we had to deal with. That is what we are trying to achieve when we label a person as a failure, we are attaching shame to A meaningless act. Throughout my life I have been around alot of people that most would classify as "failures" and not one of them seemed any different than myself.
The problem comes to life when a person starts their downswing, which we classify as "losing," they begin to suspect that they may "fail" and rather than become susceptible to the shame that comes with "failure" they decide to quit. They stop because they fear things that aren't even real. The people who come to realize these negative labels aren't real, either concretely or intuitively, are the same people that do not give up, no matter how bad things seem to be running. Eventually they become the "professionals" in whatever walk of life they choose.
You have to find your own way to deal with these thoughts that have been brainwashed into your mind for your whole life. Identifying every negative thought as it creeps into your mind is a start, it takes practice to monitor your thoughts, but you cannot eliminate what you do not recognize.
I try very hard not to allow any negativity in my life, ask my brother(ship_it_tome) how upset I get when he is at my house, playing, struggling, for hours on end, and finally says "I can't win." We get along very well, but I get very irate with him when he utters those deadly words, as I am sure you all have muttered them at one time or another.
Quote:
I think you can learn how to avoid this trap of psychological betrayal. I think I'm beginning to learn it myself. It involves turning your noise filter all the way up.
Turning your noise filter up will work for a time, but eventually it builds and seeps through at one time or another, and everything that has been blocked comes pouring out at once, which creates the very worst tilt imaginable. Believe me, I have been there many times. I have come to realize that it is much better to acknowledge the negative or angry thoughts as they arrive, that doesn't mean just noticing their presence, when they approach, actually talk to your mind and announce their arrival, and then identify the reasons behind them. As your mind comes to realize how trivial and meaningless these thoughts are, it will eventually stop creating them in the first place. It takes alot of time and effort to do this, but the long term results will be well worth it.
OK....SO HOW DOES ALL THIS REALLY RELATE TO POKER?
The game that most of us play is really very simple. You get 2 cards, 5 cards come up, and you do a little betting here and there. Best 5 card hand wins.
With a game this simple, why do so many people have so much trouble ending up ahead of where they started?
The real game is about people, not the cards in your hand. If you know a person well enough, you can read their hand, and once you know what they have in their hand, the game becomes a cakewalk. The problem is, we have all of these predisposed ideas of who a person is based on ideas that have been placed in our heads by our society. You have to be able to eliminate all of these ideas. Once you train yourself to be completely judgement free, you will become a more complete player. Anyone can read a persons hand based on his actions and seeing common tendencies, ie., a beginning player will commonly bet small when on a draw, and bet big when he has a made hand. What about more experienced players? What does it mean when they bet 2/3s of the pot one time, and than bet pot the next? They are certainly experienced enough to know not to bet the same pattern for the same types of hands. So how can you figure out what they have? Well, get to know him, watch him play. Try and figure out what he is thinking, he has to be thinking something. Put yourself in his spot, what kind of hand would you have if you were betting like that?
Now do this for every hand for every player that is in the hand, for every player at the table, for every table that you are playing at. Try and eight table while doing this exercise. Put effort into every single hand that is played out at your table, not just the ones you are involved in, every single hand. Every time there is a showdown, and the losing hand is mucked, open up the hand history file, and see what he had. Go through the hand again and see if you can figure out why he willingly showed down a losing hand(something that should rarely be done.)
I call this an exercise, but this should be done on every single hand that is played out at any of your tables for the rest of your poker career. This is how you become a real player, then you can ignore the "sng" formula and really start to play. Post flop is where the real game is at, and it is fun to play. Use your bets to pull information from your opponent, and then when you know what he has, trust your judgement 100%. If you think he is on second pair, but will not fold unless you bet your whole stack, then bet your whole stack(unless of course you have a better hand than second pair, which is unlikely since players like us can rarely beat bottom pair), even if it means your tournament is over if you are wrong. Practice trusting yourself, you will be wrong enough in the beginning to doubt yourself, but don't let that stop you.
There is a strong possibility that I am the most active player in the world, and I can honestly say that this is something that I do on nearly every hand. Imagine, 6000 hands a day on average, just watching and learning, with no predisposed judgements of the other players. This is what it takes. Bad beats are no longer bad beats, they are just the cards coming out randomly, evening themselves out over time. What is really important is learning the thousands of languages that different people speak through their actions at the table. Believe me, it isn't some spiritual science, it is listening and learning without prejudice.
Gigabet
|
iMsoLucky0
Rebuying
Reged: 12/29/04
Posts: 1832
Loc: vortex of the american dream.
|
|
Wow. Definitely +EV there.
|
1C5
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 10/17/04
Posts: 6378
Loc: Golf season...75, here I come
|
|
Post of the year. Thank you!
|
Irieguy
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 08/15/04
Posts: 2357
Loc: Las Vegas
|
|
That's the most enlightening and helpful thing I have ever read about poker.
Thank you, Gigabet.
Irieguy
|
PrayingMantis
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 11/03/03
Posts: 2443
Loc: some war zone
|
|
Great great post. In many ways.
And that line really made me laugh so much:
Quote:
players like us can rarely beat bottom pair

Thanks.
|
TheAmp
member
Reged: 12/31/04
Posts: 171
|
|
Thanks. You are a wise person.
S.J.
|
dankhank
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 12/11/04
Posts: 2420
Loc: stagnating
|
|
awesome, amazing, i was going to take the night off from playing but now i can't wait to get home and get some hands in.
|
mcpherzen
member
Reged: 12/30/04
Posts: 160
Loc: Vegas, Baby...24/7
|
|
Quote:
awesome, amazing, i was going to take the night off from playing but now i can't wait to get home and get some hands in.
Funny how different players will react to this thread differently. I was looking forward to playing tonight, but now having read this, all I want to do is re-read it 100 times and meditate for about a week.
--zen
|
johnnybeef
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 10/25/04
Posts: 4720
Loc: Run Beenie! Run!
|
|
Quote:
The real game is about people, not the cards in your hand. If you know a person well enough, you can read their hand, and once you know what they have in their hand, the game becomes a cakewalk. The problem is, we have all of these predisposed ideas of who a person is based on ideas that have been placed in our heads by our society. You have to be able to eliminate all of these ideas. Once you train yourself to be completely judgement free, you will become a more complete player. Anyone can read a persons hand based on his actions and seeing common tendencies, ie., a beginning player will commonly bet small when on a draw, and bet big when he has a made hand. What about more experienced players? What does it mean when they bet 2/3s of the pot one time, and than bet pot the next? They are certainly experienced enough to know not to bet the same pattern for the same types of hands. So how can you figure out what they have? Well, get to know him, watch him play. Try and figure out what he is thinking, he has to be thinking something. Put yourself in his spot, what kind of hand would you have if you were betting like that?
Now do this for every hand for every player that is in the hand, for every player at the table, for every table that you are playing at. Try and eight table while doing this exercise. Put effort into every single hand that is played out at your table, not just the ones you are involved in, every single hand. Every time there is a showdown, and the losing hand is mucked, open up the hand history file, and see what he had. Go through the hand again and see if you can figure out why he willingly showed down a losing hand(something that should rarely be done.)
I call this an exercise, but this should be done on every single hand that is played out at any of your tables for the rest of your poker career. This is how you become a real player, then you can ignore the "sng" formula and really start to play. Post flop is where the real game is at, and it is fun to play. Use your bets to pull information from your opponent, and then when you know what he has, trust your judgement 100%. If you think he is on second pair, but will not fold unless you bet your whole stack, then bet your whole stack(unless of course you have a better hand than second pair, which is unlikely since players like us can rarely beat bottom pair), even if it means your tournament is over if you are wrong. Practice trusting yourself, you will be wrong enough in the beginning to doubt yourself, but don't let that stop you.
There is a strong possibility that I am the most active player in the world, and I can honestly say that this is something that I do on nearly every hand. Imagine, 6000 hands a day on average, just watching and learning, with no predisposed judgements of the other players. This is what it takes. Bad beats are no longer bad beats, they are just the cards coming out randomly, evening themselves out over time. What is really important is learning the thousands of languages that different people speak through their actions at the table. Believe me, it isn't some spiritual science, it is listening and learning without prejudice.
this is by far the best advice i have read on this forum...it is what seperates the top pros from those who are average by playing "technically sound". it is why i consider myself a great player as even before i started playing poker i was always very good at understanding people. gigabet, consider yourself very lucky that you can do this at eight tables without a face and physical behavior to aid you, as i can not, and it is my belief that this is why i have won over 10k in the last 3 months playing live yet at the same time am barely even.
|
gumpzilla
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 02/11/05
Posts: 7911
|
|
Quote:
this is by far the best advice i have read on this forum...it is what seperates the top pros from those who are average by playing "technically sound". it is why i consider myself a great player as even before i started playing poker i was always very good at understanding people. gigabet, consider yourself very lucky that you can do this at eight tables without a face and physical behavior to aid you, as i can not, and it is my belief that this is why i have won over 10k in the last 3 months playing live yet at the same time am barely even.
I would say that this is the same advice that 90% of the posts on this forum are about - put an opponent on a range of hands based on their actions, act accordingly, and pay attention so you can make your reads. Play hard. Yes, it's a nicely written post, but if this is all that revelatory, have you really been paying much attention?
|
Gigabet
addict
Reged: 10/03/04
Posts: 402
Loc: Iowa
|
|
Quote:
and it is my belief that this is why i have won over 10k in the last 3 months playing live yet at the same time am barely even.
Are you bluff calling the flop? Online you cannot bluff call without a very deep stack, something I do all the time live. Exception is if you are big stack and the other stacks are about the size where they have to start worrying about the size of the blinds.
|
The Yugoslavian
STTF-HUC II Champion
Reged: 09/24/04
Posts: 7718
Loc: back from beyond the grave
|
|
Thank you.
Yugoslav
|
morgan180
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 09/15/04
Posts: 2155
Loc: He could go all the way...
|
|
Quote:
I would say that this is the same advice that 90% of the posts on this forum are about - put an opponent on a range of hands based on their actions, act accordingly, and pay attention so you can make your reads. Play hard. Yes, it's a nicely written post, but if this is all that revelatory, have you really been paying much attention?
Any time you read a "what should i do with XX hand on XXX flop ..." you should re-read this post. We talk a lot about math, a lot about what to do with specific hands, which on one level is a good approach for learning the basics of the game, but on the other hand doesn't open up your thinking to how to really play and reach your version of success in poker.
I am a perfect example of this, I ask a lot of what to do, but I struggle to take the time to sit back and think about why is a person making a particular play. I get the numbers, I lack the understanding.
For every person on these boards searching for the formula, the answer is there is no formula, there is no wrong or right, there are only choices. The better you get at knowing why people are making choices, and then crafting your responses in return to those choices, the better poker player you will become. It's like the matrix, you can't bend the spoon, for that is impossible. First you have to realize that there is no spoon.
So this post comes from someone watching everything going on on this site, and is a already in my favorite threads. Thanks Gigabet, it is very TOP-esque.
|
dankhank
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 12/11/04
Posts: 2420
Loc: stagnating
|
|
I really believe that everyone has the "psychological fortitude" to manage the vicissitudes of the game. It is simply a choice. A choice to change the way you think about results. Stop thinking in terms of winning as good and losing as bad. The two concepts should be grouped in your mind exactly the same.
what's revelatory is the dissonance between this post and numerous posts such as the one irie made. for me, this post struck a deeper chord in terms of the open-ended fate that will be each of our poker careers, coupled with the myriad options (and yet the best option is often so simple) we have while sitting at the table.
consider this: giga wrote that just because one person doesn't achieve the same thing he does, that that doesn't make one a winner and one a loser. this is very different rhetoric than the sklansky maxim "remember, above all else, we are playing poker to win money."
Practice trusting yourself, you will be wrong enough in the beginning to doubt yourself, but don't let that stop you.
what this post did, actually, is relax me into trusting my game me than i did an hour ago. i had a slight losing weekend - ending a two month rush - and i felt like i wanted to walk away from the tables for awhile, partly to protect my winnings, partly because i felt myself not playing as well as i can. playing too recklessly, too loose, too bluffy, too apt to tilt after a bad beat/result.
i also just had a week where i blew off some online profits playing drunk at two relatively tough club games. this post made me feel, concretely, "okay, you really need to be sober when you play there tomorrow."
this post relaxed me in a way that similar psychological-bent posts have done, but only partially. the theory put forth here, in a vague way, is more totalizing than other such posts.
have you really been paying attention?
|
bball904
enthusiast
Reged: 07/12/04
Posts: 206
Loc: Iowa
|
|
Outstanding post. Thank you.
My favorite part:
Quote:
This is how you become a real player, then you can ignore the "sng" formula and really start to play. Post flop is where the real game is at, and it is fun to play.
It amazes me how much this entire post contradicts the consensus of this forum, yet many "sng formula" posters can understand the significance of it. However, I doubt very many can leave the formula behind which answers the first question I had after reading this... Why would Gigabet disclose so much (but really yet so little) in this brilliant post?
|
gumpzilla
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 02/11/05
Posts: 7911
|
|
Going to reply to two hands in one post here.
Quote:
Any time you read a "what should i do with XX hand on XXX flop ..." you should re-read this post. We talk a lot about math, a lot about what to do with specific hands, which on one level is a good approach for learning the basics of the game, but on the other hand doesn't open up your thinking to how to really play and reach your version of success in poker.
The point of the lengthy mathematical discussions is that these form a framework for HOW to think about various situations. Implicitly, by showing the calculations that are relevant, posters are explaining "Here's how I think about a situation. I've filled in some of the variables." Such calculations are virtually impossible to do in the middle of a game. By doing or going over many similar calculations in situations outside of the game, though, you can start to gain a sense of what might or might not be appropriate in a particular situation. You're not preparing yourself specifically for holding QJo on the bubble as the second shortest stack UTG in an SNG, but for many other situations which have a lot of similarities going for them.
Quote:
For every person on these boards searching for the formula, the answer is there is no formula, there is no wrong or right, there are only choices. The better you get at knowing why people are making choices, and then crafting your responses in return to those choices, the better poker player you will become.
Better implies that there is something right or wrong, namely right or wrong choices. The major discussion here is how to make choices that are right if winning money is your primary concern. If winning money is not your primary concern, and you're more interested in fun, then make fun-maximizing decisions instead. There are fewer of those people who post here, because the people who like to take the time to analyze these situations are usually inclined towards winning/making money, and it's a much more subjective topic, so it's not discussed much. A fun-maximizing player might shove with 72o much more often than he should because it's so fun to show the bluff if everybody folds or suck out on somebody. I know people like this.
Quote:
what this post did, actually, is relax me into trusting my game me than i did an hour ago.
Is that a good thing? Trusting your game is excellent if you have reason to believe that your game is good. This was the thrust, if I understood it correctly, of Irieguy's post. If a losing player is interested in becoming a winning player, the solution is rarely going to be "trusting his game." Instead, it is in critiquing his game, and discovering where the problems lie.
In context, I believe Giga's trust comment was specifically about trusting reads on your opponents, which is quite a bit more specific than trusting one's entire game. Given such reads, including ideas about how your opponent will interpret your various actions and how that will cause them to react, there is going to be an EV-maximizing play. Trusting your reads seems wise; if you can't make any read, it's going to be hard to decide on a good play. But blind trust is no good. You need to be willing to acknowledge when your opponent turns over a hand that you had ruled out that you still aren't making reads as good as you could be. It's too easy - and I suspect almost all of this know this from experience - to blame bad luck rather than questionable decisions for unhappy outcomes.
|
MagnoliasFM
member
Reged: 02/02/05
Posts: 140
|
|
Thank you.
It's good to know that a player as successful as yourself believes in God.
|
The Yugoslavian
STTF-HUC II Champion
Reged: 09/24/04
Posts: 7718
Loc: back from beyond the grave
|
|
Quote:
Why would Gigabet disclose so much (but really yet so little) in this brilliant post?
To Gigabet (under the 2+2 forums constructs) we are not sharks but merely monkeys.
However, under his own construction (or deconstruction) of the poker world, it would seem we are simply other *people* who are caught in a mental mind-f*ck.
Gigabet's post is about the significance of one's fundamental approach to poker and how it impacts playing in a fulfilling and meaningful way. For him, it would seem this is maintaining absolute focus constantly while improving and crushing the game for tons of $$.
Now, there is no judgment on whether or not this should be the 'correct' way to approach poker. It is his way and seems to be the end 'result' of what so many 2+2ers are striving for. I think he feels for everyone (to a degree) wrapped up in the poker win/lose or success/failure trap.
Since we are all 'monkeys,' he need not be very concerned about his post impacting his future poker income. In fact, I would guess his aim is more to help people enjoy poker rather than improve their play.
IMO, what Gigabet has done is turn the poker tenets we have been reading/thinking/living on their head and given us all a chance to not only rethink our fundamental approach but reattach our mind to poker in a more helpful (and ultimately enjoyable) way.
Yugoslav
|
PrayingMantis
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 11/03/03
Posts: 2443
Loc: some war zone
|
|
Quote:
It's good to know that a player as successful as yourself believes in God.
This is very funny. It also looks like you have completely misundertood what Giga was trying to say about being "successful" or being "a failure". But what the hell. If you think believing in "god" has anything to do with playing strong poker, well........
|
GtrHtr
Trained Killer
Reged: 02/22/05
Posts: 3729
|
|
Thank you. Was this the missing secret from your post a week or so past???? Outstanding.
|
willie
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 04/14/04
Posts: 3230
|
|
ty giga -aaaaahn.
|
skipperbob
Old Fool-Bah
Reged: 08/21/04
Posts: 2950
Loc: Baby-sitting the 2+2'er's
|
|
"S.T.F.U." Donny; you're outa your element
|
adanthar
Possibly Too Level Headed
Reged: 04/02/04
Posts: 14174
Loc: Intrepidly Reporting
|
|
Quote:
Use your bets to pull information from your opponent, and then when you know what he has, trust your judgement 100%. If you think he is on second pair, but will not fold unless you bet your whole stack, then bet your whole stack(unless of course you have a better hand than second pair, which is unlikely since players like us can rarely beat bottom pair), even if it means your tournament is over if you are wrong. Practice trusting yourself, you will be wrong enough in the beginning to doubt yourself, but don't let that stop you.
I got the math part of poker and the logic part of poker in 2 weeks. 15 months later, I'm still working on this part and am *finally* getting somewhere with it.
I really wish I'd seen this thread a year ago...but then again, I wouldn't have understood it then.
|
gumpzilla
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 02/11/05
Posts: 7911
|
|
Quote:
I got the math part of poker and the logic part of poker in 2 weeks. 15 months later, I'm still working on this part and am *finally* getting somewhere with it.
I don't understand the breakdown between the "math part" and hand reading. Hand reading is a source of information that you can then process mathematically; they aren't totally independent entities. It's a much more difficult skill to learn than calculating pot odds, true.
There's a good thread by Tom Weideman in RGP from a few months ago entitled "Confessions of a Math Guy, Part 1" here that addresses some of these topics. Part 2 and Part 3 are also worth reading, as I remember. Sklansky also talks about it a lot in Theory of Poker, with all the little bits about estimating how likely your opponent is to have various hands based on his actions.
|
The Yugoslavian
STTF-HUC II Champion
Reged: 09/24/04
Posts: 7718
Loc: back from beyond the grave
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
It's good to know that a player as successful as yourself believes in God.
This is very funny. It also looks like you have completely misundertood what Giga was trying to say about being "successful" or being "a failure". But what the hell. If you think believing in "god" has anything to do with playing strong poker, well........
But PM, didn't you see that post coming? I was only surprised at the rapidity that it was called out as a standalone and important in-and-of-itself. And, I didn't think it would be referenced so delicously as to also make use of the word 'success,' in direct opposition to the most obvious thrust of Gigabet's post.
Seriously, as I read the original Gigabet sentence, I immediately thought 'there's 100% chance someone boils this whole post all down to that somehow.'
Personally, that one sentence gave me the warm and fuzzies - the hell with the rest of Gigabet's post - he's obviously a man of God, doing God's work and that's what counts! 
Yugoslav (Who wants to know what God has to do with it?)
|
adanthar
Possibly Too Level Headed
Reged: 04/02/04
Posts: 14174
Loc: Intrepidly Reporting
|
|
I don't mean hand reading. That part's just logic and it's relatively easy.
It's going with your instincts and the hand reading combined *despite* the math that's a real bitch.
|
Burno
veteran
Reged: 05/11/04
Posts: 1598
Loc: Self-Actualizing
|
|
Wow.
First post I've ever printed out.
|
gumpzilla
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 02/11/05
Posts: 7911
|
|
Quote:
I don't mean hand reading. That part's just logic and it's relatively easy.
It's going with your instincts and the hand reading combined *despite* the math that's a real bitch.
When is this going to be a good idea? If your hand reading is absolutely top-notch and you know what an opponent has, then all that means is you are no longer putting your opponent on a range, but a single hand. Is it a hand that you can make them fold if it beats you? Is it a hand that you're getting the right price to draw against if you can't get them out? Is it a worse hand that you can get them to pay you with? How sure are you about any of the actions they can take given how you behave? These are the exact same questions that we ask in other situations, we're just doing it with much more specific and narrow information. It becomes much easier to calculate our EV, and we're still going to make plays to maximize this.
Advertising and constructing an image can throw a bit of a monkey wrench in here, but all those things are really doing is setting it up so that in future situations, you have a better idea about what kind of plays your opponent will make, and try to influence them to make plays that you know you can profit by.
The math doesn't go away. It just gets practiced so often that it becomes intuition.
|
adanthar
Possibly Too Level Headed
Reged: 04/02/04
Posts: 14174
Loc: Intrepidly Reporting
|
|
Quote:
When is this going to be a good idea? If your hand reading is absolutely top-notch and you know what an opponent has, then all that means is you are no longer putting your opponent on a range, but a single hand.
That's never really gonna happen unless you're Gigabet. I'm talking about the situations where the math says you're behind to his whole range but your gut says that if you push he's going to fold.
This by no means implies you can ignore the math - it's still in the background and it forms part of your instincts. But what you're doing at that point isn't really ABC poker anymore.
|
shayneon
member
Reged: 02/24/05
Posts: 169
Loc: PHX
|
|
Man, I have not felt like this much of an intellectual hack in a long time. Thank You.
|
gumpzilla
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 02/11/05
Posts: 7911
|
|
Quote:
I'm talking about the situations where the math says you're behind to his whole range but your gut says that if you push he's going to fold.
Then assuming your read is good, pushing becomes a better move than calling or folding. Folding equity calculations that are extremely routine on this forum work just fine here; say you're 90% sure (because, yes, you're never going to be 100% sure) he's going to fold whatever he has, or figure he'll fold all but one specific hand and see what that tells you.
ABC poker doesn't have anything to do with it. The concepts don't lose their usefulness if you take them out of push or fold situations. The inputs become more complex but the general method should remain the same. You seem to be implying that math is good for laying down a simple, utilitarian style that is not to be deviated from, the final all-in fest of SNGs being a good example. But it can be much more flexible.
Can you produce an example of a play that you think is good that you can both explain why you think it is good but also think that "the math" says it is bad?
|
adanthar
Possibly Too Level Headed
Reged: 04/02/04
Posts: 14174
Loc: Intrepidly Reporting
|
|
I'm pretty sure we're speaking past each other here. I know what you're talking about and I think you know what I mean, too. I also don't want to derail this thread so let's take it to PM's.
|
eagle
stranger
Reged: 01/16/05
Posts: 23
|
|
Gigabet has this amazing ability to say what everyone either knows or should know in a way that clarifies all the confusion that we call this forum (Irie also does a great job of this).
Seriously, how much simpler can it be. You just need to know what your opponent has, and then all the other problems will take care of themselves. The best is that he even tells you how to do it, and I'll bet as I'm writing this that 95% of the people that set out to do what he said have already stopped doing it.
Gigabet must get bored saying the same thing over and over. Last month, he said, "Think about every decision you make at table before you make it."
Geez, that's real revolutionary. I wonder how many people do it.
Great post Gig.
|
DonButtons
Miami's Finest
Reged: 12/13/04
Posts: 2041
|
|
Ok, first part, was awesome.
So true, I sadly quit the $200 sngs after about playing 500-750 in a couple weeks, just because I didnt see the game the way I see it today in my mind. I just wasn't prepared for the swings at the time, and the mind games it can cause. I mean, I made a insane $## per sng in the 200s, but the swings, were to big on some days, where I just couldnt play my A game. And I guess its what caused me to get burnt out.
I totally respect the way you see the game, and its something I started to use in my games as well, I noticed if I try to block out the bad beats, It doesnt help, as after a lot of them it all comes out at once, and thats prob. worse than taking it out on each bad beat. But trying to see it from a whole different perspective, like what you explained is what really helped me out.
Your part about losing/winning is another important part, as Im sometimes to caught up if Im up for the day or down. Im starting to think of it as a long term game, and results shouldn't matter day by day.
Your 2nd part, is just insane advice which I think a lot of players on here while not be able to grasp right away (obviously, lots of hard work, and it should take time to build up to this level). I think only your the only person who can handle 8 sngs at a time continously playing the "person" and not his cards while continously checking hand histories of different players to see how they play certain hands.
|
eastbay
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/05/03
Posts: 4123
|
|
Giga says "learn to read your opponents." Forum falls over. News at 11. 
Great post.
eastbay
|
Cheeseweasel
journeyman
Reged: 10/20/04
Posts: 70
|
|
"The mind is like a clear mirror standing. Take care to wipe it all the time, Allow no grain of dust to cling to it."
Shen Hsui
"They asked each other, 'Were not our hearts burning within us while he talked with us on the road and opened the Scriptures to us?'"
Luke 24:32
|
DyessMan89
old hand
Reged: 10/08/04
Posts: 977
Loc: Folding KK to a lone raise
|
|
Quote:
Wow.
First post I've ever printed out.
Saw this post while my first ever "post" is being printed out. Oh the irony.
|
johnnybeef
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 10/25/04
Posts: 4720
Loc: Run Beenie! Run!
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
and it is my belief that this is why i have won over 10k in the last 3 months playing live yet at the same time am barely even.
Are you bluff calling the flop? Online you cannot bluff call without a very deep stack, something I do all the time live. Exception is if you are big stack and the other stacks are about the size where they have to start worrying about the size of the blinds.
i attribute my live results to two things. the first is that the competition is a little bit softer. the second is due to the fact that i am a much more visual person and i can remember a faces hands much better than a screennames. furthermore, i find that the concept of table image is much easier for me to apply in live games, i.e. the second and third level of thinking are easier for me to achieve as i can see someones reactions.
|
nyc999
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 09/15/04
Posts: 2195
|
|
bump -- it's worth a second read
Great post.
|
voltron87b
journeyman
Reged: 02/28/05
Posts: 87
Loc: Banned
|
|
All that knowledge and experience and he doesn't know how to post a link. That is failure.
Anyhow, that's one of the best and most well thought out posts ever on 2+2. Your thoughts about players classifying themselves as "losers" are spot on. I think you trying to say that the outcome of a particular SNG or the balance in your PartyPoker account has little to do with whether we have succeeded or failed, but growing up in our society we are trained to think that finishing 1st in an SNG is success, and OOTM is failure.
So you are saying that losing in poker is not necessarily failing, and vice versa, yet virtually all poker players categorize things this way. You say to disconnect failure from evaluation of your own results, and to not think negatively. To be more objective while looking at your play. This is mostly due to the fact that we play this game for money. By now I feel I am more writing this as a learning experience and thought excerise for myself than a contribution to the forum. I also have a feeling that you were not born understanding this and you probably realized it at a time when you could not be crippled financially by a bad beat. Not being crippled financially by a bad beat will allow a player to seperate failure from their daily balance.
Your paragraph about researching other players' tendancies and habits is revealing. Not everyone has the mental capacity, focus, and memory to do this. It is not something that can be learned overnight.
A question to you is how useful is this skill and practice if you only play with a player for 45 minutes? This is online play, and more 95% of us we don't see that many repeat players. Sure, I could learn more about the players I am playing with at mid limit SNGs but I'm probably not going to play with them again. Does this change for you as you move up in stakes, when the player pool is smaller? Do you use any poker software to track opponents' various stats?
Thanks for posting.
Postscript (Hey, this is one of my longest posts)
I'm writing this uder a new name since the last one go banned for censor bypass. I wrote this when there were 2 replies, so I saved it and was going to wait until I got my account back... but I'm impatient. So don't censor bypass.
|
nath
the second coming of the second coming
Reged: 01/26/05
Posts: 22162
Loc: Tone
|
|
I love love love this post. This is how I try to think. Just one minor quibble...
"Believe me, it isn't some spiritual science, it is listening and learning without prejudice."
That IS the spiritual science-- learning to be completely open to every experience and using your full powers of perception. That may sound a little crazy but part of the reason I play poker is because it drives me to that mental state.
|
theredpill5
old hand
Reged: 02/02/05
Posts: 1059
|
|
awesome post. I enjoyed reading it.
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
Blarg
I'll let others elaborate
Reged: 06/06/04
Posts: 27473
Loc: Who is Fistface?
|
|
Yeah, I hadn't. Thanks.
|
SNOWBALL
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 01/22/05
Posts: 7795
Loc: Where the citizens kneel 4 sex
|
|
Are you god?
|
jedi
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 10/29/03
Posts: 3976
Loc: Selling cheezy poker gear.
|
|
Quote:
Giga says "learn to read your opponents." Forum falls over. News at 11. 
Great post.
eastbay
Part of my problem is learning to trust my read. Sometimes I'll peg someone as a loose passive donkhead. He's gotten lucky and built up a good stack and knocking people out, while I've been throwing away some decent hands but staying alive.
Now comes the bubble and I decide to make an all-in move with a marginal or crap hand, believing that he won't call off 70% of his stack on the bubble unless he has the goods. Given my read, I shouldn't expect that. He'll be calling with anything that looks good, hands that I'd throw away in a heartbeat in this spot like AT (maybe it's ME that's too tight, who knows). Just because I'd throw a hand away doesn't mean someone else would throw that same hand away, right?
On the other hand, I may be missing out on good opportunities to take chips away from too tight players. I'm still learning to play the player not the cards but it could be taking me a while to learn this.
|
Unoriginalname
old hand
Reged: 04/27/05
Posts: 705
|
|
I'm fairly new to this forum and just read this. An amazing post and definitely deserves another bump.
|
Luminous Mist
journeyman
Reged: 06/16/05
Posts: 84
|
|
Quote:
I'm fairly new to this forum and just read this. An amazing post and definitely deserves another bump.
Interestingly enough...good posts certainly don't 'deserve' bumps....and in fact, they shouldn't really get *any* bumps.
Luminous
|
hoyasnaxa
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 07/20/05
Posts: 2054
Loc: NoVA
|
|
Interesting.....just have to think......
|
pokerbo
journeyman
Reged: 06/13/05
Posts: 92
Loc: Lord of Donksville
|
|
Best Post I've ever read...That's all I'm saying for now as I have to read it again. WOW
|
EnderFFX
addict
Reged: 02/23/04
Posts: 494
|
|
What I love about this post is that a lot of these lessons can be applied to life as well. Gigabet has a great future ahead of him, regardless if he plays another hand of poker or not.
|
olddominion
newbie
Reged: 02/28/05
Posts: 31
|
|
I was a little bit upset to see this post in College Card Player magazine. Its in the October issue for anyone thats wondering.
|
TheNoodleMan
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 01/22/05
Posts: 6873
Loc: Not using the back button
|
|
what upsets you about seeing this in CP? Is it that you think it makes it to easy to stumble upon? because bumping the thread does the same thing
|
DMBFan23
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/10/04
Posts: 8515
Loc: > Brady
|
|
Quote:
I really wish I'd seen this thread a year ago...but then again, I wouldn't have understood it then.
|
leonard9
***
Reged: 05/26/05
Posts: 324
|
|
Quote:
I really wish I'd seen this thread a year ago...but then again, I don't understand it now
FYP
|
bklynkid008
stranger
Reged: 11/12/05
Posts: 1
|
|
This may be seem off topic, but I submit it anyway. I was in Atlantic City once a couple of years back, and per my usual routine I was doing a very little bit of playing table games and alot of watching. I simply enjoy the reality of watching the fluctuations we call luck play themselves. Like when I bump into a guy with a stressed look on his face and ask him how he's doing.. He replies, he's down 10 baloons. 10K.. I offer a sympathetic tight smile and give him my patented, It'll turn....It'll turn.. Then within 5 minutes I witness him call to a Sic Bo dealer he knew "Hey Joe I need the triple 5s NOW" He places a bet for the triple fives, the dealer shakes the dice cup vigorously and out come three fives, a 216-1 shot. With a $25 chip on it, the dealer smiles and pays him out 5K. Next lesson I step to the left and watch two 20 something year old guys at a Pai Gow table, I watched them from the start. Their grubstake a couple hundred bucks. Within 30 minutes they ran it up to 100k, I witnessed every hand of the journey. At 100k the pit boss or floor person told the dealer that's it, he had to come out. The dealer begged and pleaded with the manager to let him stay in, "these guys were going to turn around" It took 10 minutes of pleading.. The manager left him in. As if they rang a bell... the downhill run for these players began in earnest, Straight down.. so they went for a nice ride, from $200-300 up to 100k right back in slightly less time to nadaville, zip and they quietly walked away. I looked at the dealer and I walked away too... Looking for a $6.00 hot dog and the next show of high drama in probability. What's the lesson here.. well the lesson is in the world of gaming, any gaming, you must know that you'll face fluctuations and if you don't have the mind set to deal with it, well enuf said..... And the Chris Moneymaker thing... you have to realize exactly how many times (plenty) his championship hung in the balance of a final all in draw, and that something other than all of his skills, which are great.. had to present to help him close out all of those opponents. What was it?? A luck vector. Something he could not control.. His main skill in my opinion, was knowing(feeling) that the vector was there and that it was going to be strong enough to carry him to the end that he hoped for...
|
Slo Pok
stranger
Reged: 08/13/03
Posts: 18
Loc: Media, PA
|
|
I have come to realize that it is much better to acknowledge the negative or angry thoughts as they arrive, that doesn't mean just noticing their presence, when they approach, actually talk to your mind and announce their arrival, and then identify the reasons behind them. As your mind comes to realize how trivial and meaningless these thoughts are, it will eventually stop creating them in the first place. It takes alot of time and effort to do this, but the long term results will be well worth it.
What I have come to realize is even when the mind doesn't stop creating them because the mind is a very tricky fellow those thoughts become little "smoozes". So I invite them in, "ahhhhhh howdy my little friend anger, or fear, or judgment howya been?" Awareness, Allowness, let go-ness.....and it's fun too! There seems to me these little fellows act from wanting something or not wanting something. It appears to me they either want love and approval, want control, want oneness or separation or want security. We all have our dragons, and as the mythology suggests are we going to slay our dragons. Smiles
|
durron597
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 04/07/04
Posts: 30000
Loc: Folding
|
|
Quote:
$200-300 up to 100k right back in slightly less time to nadaville, zip and they quietly walked away.
This is one of the dumbest degenerate gambling stories I've ever heard.
|
RagnarPirate
journeyman
Reged: 02/20/06
Posts: 91
|
|
This is a great post....if you want to create a bunch of suckers. And, judging from the responses, you're doing a spectacular job.
I got a great laugh out of the line:
"There are no successful people, or rather, using these words, I should say that there are no failures and everyone is a success."
|
b33nz
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/16/04
Posts: 3564
Loc: creepin' on ah come up
|
|
Quote:
This is a great post....if you want to create a bunch of suckers. And, judging from the responses, you're doing a spectacular job.
I got a great laugh out of the line:
"There are no successful people, or rather, using these words, I should say that there are no failures and everyone is a success."
Welcome to the forums, friend.
|
asofel
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 10/04/04
Posts: 4370
Loc: 3.0 certified
|
|
not to start [censored] but anyone want to comment on g's post in light of things I've heard? has that been discussed elsewhere?
|
Gobgogbog
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 09/07/05
Posts: 1734
|
|
IMO his posts are still his posts. I've always taken them and evaluated them for their content, not from an argument-by-authority. I've gotten a lot out of the discussions that he's had with various people on here, and gossip central doesn't really change that.
|
SuitedSixes
Sexual Tyrannosaurus
Reged: 05/27/04
Posts: 4810
Loc: Buy shrits!
|
|
Quote:
not to start [censored] but anyone want to comment on g's post in light of things I've heard? has that been discussed elsewhere?
I like how whenever someone says, "Not to start [censored]," that is exactly his intention. Classless.
|
Melchiades
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 05/31/05
Posts: 5040
Loc: Norway (London currently)
|
|
Quote:
I like how whenever someone says, "Not to start [censored]," that is exactly his intention. Classless.
|
TheNoodleMan
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 01/22/05
Posts: 6873
Loc: Not using the back button
|
|
Quote:
not to start [censored] but...
take it NVG. No reason to bump this thread just to add gossip to it. Even if the worst imaginable was true, it doesn't give license to start bumping old threads and drag down legitimate content.
|
The Yugoslavian
STTF-HUC II Champion
Reged: 09/24/04
Posts: 7718
Loc: back from beyond the grave
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
not to start [censored] but...
take it NVG. No reason to bump this thread just to add gossip to it. Even if the worst imaginable was true, it doesn't give license to start bumping old threads and drag down legitimate content.
At least he bumped one of the (if not the) best posts of 2005.
Yugoslav
|
FlyWf
angriest dude in the prison yard
Reged: 04/18/04
Posts: 3237
Loc: Brian Coming imo
|
|
Beyond the somewhat classless nature of starting [censored] here, what does Giga's personal finances have to do with whether his post is good advice or not?
|
Fishy McDonk
addict
Reged: 02/10/06
Posts: 669
Loc: pond behind barn
|
|
Quote:
So how can you figure out what they have? Well, get to know him, watch him play. Try and figure out what he is thinking, he has to be thinking something. Put yourself in his spot, what kind of hand would you have if you were betting like that?
Now do this for every hand for every player that is in the hand, for every player at the table, for every table that you are playing at. Try and eight table while doing this exercise. Put effort into every single hand that is played out at your table, not just the ones you are involved in, every single hand. Every time there is a showdown, and the losing hand is mucked, open up the hand history file, and see what he had. Go through the hand again and see if you can figure out why he willingly showed down a losing hand(something that should rarely be done.)
I call this an exercise, but this should be done on every single hand that is played out at any of your tables for the rest of your poker career. There is a strong possibility that I am the most active player in the world, and I can honestly say that this is something that I do on nearly every hand. Imagine, 6000 hands a day on average, just watching and learning, with no predisposed judgements of the other players. Gigabet
I have just arrived at this point in the "An Anthology of 2+2 Wisdom on MTTs". I don't know anything about Gigabet but to do what he is talking about, you would have to be an android (and a very advanced one like "Data")
Even if I could play 6000 hands in a day (which I can't), it seems to me it would take a week to analyze them.
|
skierdude1000
addict
Reged: 06/29/04
Posts: 665
|
|
how do you actively pay attention to the cards of people at 8 tables and constantly put them on cards when all the screens keep blinking?
|
nuggetz87
passtheparsley
Reged: 09/19/04
Posts: 6175
Loc: labtop
|
|
Quote:
how do you actively pay attention to the cards of people at 8 tables and constantly put them on cards when all the screens keep blinking?
this guy just crushed b33nz' record, whatever it was.
|
AMT
Railbird Extraordinaire
Reged: 09/15/05
Posts: 9771
Loc: Watching my baby grinders take...
|
|
Quote:
how do you actively pay attention to the cards of people at 8 tables and constantly put them on cards when all the screens keep blinking?
nice bump....i bumped a post of YOURS though, degen, and it was a year old, so booya.
second off, i asked this when i was more of a n00b and people basically said you dont....search for other threads
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
AMT
Railbird Extraordinaire
Reged: 09/15/05
Posts: 9771
Loc: Watching my baby grinders take...
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
how do you actively pay attention to the cards of people at 8 tables and constantly put them on cards when all the screens keep blinking?
nice bump....i bumped a post of YOURS though, degen, and it was a year old, so booya.
second off, i asked this when i was more of a n00b and people basically said you dont....search for other threads
haha nice, which thread?
i believe it was when your "1 year of being a pro" thread was posted a couple months ago, and you had a link to your original "going pro" thread in there and i bumped the [censored] out of that
|
BigBuffet
old hand
Reged: 07/19/06
Posts: 1063
Loc: In the thick of it
|
|
Quote:
This is a great post...if you want to create a bunch of suckers. And, judging from the responses, you're doing a spectacular job.
I got a great laugh out of the line:
"There are no successful people, or rather, using these words, I should say that there are no failures and everyone is a success."
I see G's thoughts in two ways:
1) He may be saying that the journey is more important than getting from point A to B. In that case, if you learn and have fun along the way, then that is a success.
2) If you do want to measure your success by BB/100, BB/hr, ROI, etc then you still have to ignore those measures in order to reach them. This is what seems counter-intuitive, god-like or whatever to some of you.
Evaluating opponents with a detached outlook and playing them based on your reads and intuition (whether those reads and intuition are based on absorbing the math of shtloads of hands or are just a skill in and of itself doesn't matter, as long as you get to that point) is the path to playing well. And playing well will be a good journey as well as getting you to Point B.
|
microbet
The Best Poster Ever
Reged: 01/02/05
Posts: 7668
Loc: fighting the power
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
This is a great post...if you want to create a bunch of suckers. And, judging from the responses, you're doing a spectacular job.
I got a great laugh out of the line:
"There are no successful people, or rather, using these words, I should say that there are no failures and everyone is a success."
I see G's thoughts in two ways:
1) He may be saying that the journey is more important than getting from point A to B. In that case, if you learn and have fun along the way, then that is a success.
2) If you do want to measure your success by BB/100, BB/hr, ROI, etc then you still have to ignore those measures in order to reach them. This is what seems counter-intuitive, god-like or whatever to some of you.
Evaluating opponents with a detached outlook and playing them based on your reads and intuition (whether those reads and intuition are based on absorbing the math of shtloads of hands or are just a skill in and of itself doesn't matter, as long as you get to that point) is the path to playing well. And playing well will be a good journey as well as getting you to Point B.
If you want to bump old threads, do it with this one. It was just bumped so you have to wait a few months.
|
b33nz
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/16/04
Posts: 3564
Loc: creepin' on ah come up
|
|
microbet, that thread is awesome. great read.
|
cha59
Puzzling Solver
Reged: 10/16/04
Posts: 3070
Loc: getting tarped by AXo
|
|
Quote:
microbet, that thread is awesome. great read.
One of the funniest threads Ive ever read
|
Squareview
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 01/15/07
Posts: 2047
Loc: enigma sippin LEAN
|
|
life changing.
|
Amerzel
member
Reged: 04/11/05
Posts: 191
Loc: California
|
|
I'm glad this was bumped because somehow I missed it the first go around. Very inspiring. Thanks!
|
b33nz
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/16/04
Posts: 3564
Loc: creepin' on ah come up
|
|
Quote:
I'm glad this was bumped because somehow I missed it the first go around. Very inspiring. Thanks!
if u missed it the first time, u missed it the other 451379251 times.
|
DistantHaze
member
Reged: 02/10/06
Posts: 147
Loc: Iowa, United States
|
|
The EASIEST way to avoid stupid players catching hands is to play out of a REAL deck of cards -- not from those supposedly "random" decks you get on "poker" sites like JokerStars and Full Tilt River. Sites such as these HAVE to help the idiots, otherwise when all the donkeys lost all their money and quit playing, the sites like FTR would go broke.
|
bellytimber
STTF songwriter
Reged: 01/18/05
Posts: 487
Loc: Jonestown IN
|
|
Quote:
The EASIEST way to avoid stupid players catching hands is to play out of a REAL deck of cards -- not from those supposedly "random" decks you get on "poker" sites like JokerStars and Full Tilt River. Sites such as these HAVE to help the idiots, otherwise when all the donkeys lost all their money and quit playing, the sites like FTR would go broke.
gigabet blockhead theory QED
|
cha59
Puzzling Solver
Reged: 10/16/04
Posts: 3070
Loc: getting tarped by AXo
|
|
Quote:
The EASIEST way to avoid stupid players catching hands is to play out of a REAL deck of cards -- not from those supposedly "random" decks you get on "poker" sites like JokerStars and Full Tilt River. Sites such as these HAVE to help the idiots, otherwise when all the donkeys lost all their money and quit playing, the sites like FTR would go broke.
Ya, dont you guys know online poker is rigged? lol
|
The Yugoslavian
STTF-HUC II Champion
Reged: 09/24/04
Posts: 7718
Loc: back from beyond the grave
|
|
I this post. All I have to do now is substitute poker with life!
Yugoslav
|
dp13368
old hand
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 1064
Loc: 3-bet.n
|
|
Bump QFT
|
ShawnM
journeyman
Reged: 03/20/05
Posts: 53
|
|
Gigabet, the Hegelian philosopher.
|
degeneratedonk
journeyman
Reged: 06/26/07
Posts: 61
|
|
"Now do this for every hand for every player that is in the hand, for every player at the table, for every table that you are playing at. Try and eight table while doing this exercise. Put effort into every single hand that is played out at your table, not just the ones you are involved in, every single hand. Every time there is a showdown, and the losing hand is mucked, open up the hand history file, and see what he had. Go through the hand again and see if you can figure out why he willingly showed down a losing hand(something that should rarely be done.)"
Unless OP has an elaborate setup that greatly simplifies multi-tabling (in which case someone with a photograhic memory might be able to benefit) this is just plain unrealistic.
|
The Yugoslavian
STTF-HUC II Champion
Reged: 09/24/04
Posts: 7718
Loc: back from beyond the grave
|
|
Quote:
"Now do this for every hand for every player that is in the hand, for every player at the table, for every table that you are playing at. Try and eight table while doing this exercise. Put effort into every single hand that is played out at your table, not just the ones you are involved in, every single hand. Every time there is a showdown, and the losing hand is mucked, open up the hand history file, and see what he had. Go through the hand again and see if you can figure out why he willingly showed down a losing hand(something that should rarely be done.)"
Unless OP has an elaborate setup that greatly simplifies multi-tabling (in which case someone with a photograhic memory might be able to benefit) this is just plain unrealistic.
lol
And here I thought the bump comment would be silly!
Yugoslav
|
AMT
Railbird Extraordinaire
Reged: 09/15/05
Posts: 9771
Loc: Watching my baby grinders take...
|
|
Quote:
"Now do this for every hand for every player that is in the hand, for every player at the table, for every table that you are playing at. Try and eight table while doing this exercise. Put effort into every single hand that is played out at your table, not just the ones you are involved in, every single hand. Every time there is a showdown, and the losing hand is mucked, open up the hand history file, and see what he had. Go through the hand again and see if you can figure out why he willingly showed down a losing hand(something that should rarely be done.)"
Unless OP has an elaborate setup that greatly simplifies multi-tabling (in which case someone with a photograhic memory might be able to benefit) this is just plain unrealistic.
LOLTAKINGITLITERALLYAMENTS (i did the same thing 2 years ago)
|
Fammy
member
Reged: 11/17/04
Posts: 195
|
|
A question for someone who is trying to improve (though there may not necessarily be success and failure, there is growth):
I have been trying to work on reads (both pre and post flop)and have found my progress to be much slower than I had hoped. While I am not looking specifically for short cuts (as often they end up leaving large holes in understanding) I am looking for guidance on the "how" to learn reads. I have a decent understanding of the math, and some understanding of player types, but just find that my reads and ranges are farther off the mark than I believe they should / could be...critically appraising my game, it is a leak.
I was just wondering...short of staring at screens hand after hand (unfortunately I don't have the bankroll to do this for a long time, and we all know that the "free" sites probably do more harm to our hand reading skills then help), is there any guide / book / exercise / software / tutor / whatever that can move a student in the right direction?
I understand if there isn't, but since this originally was a thread on essentially "being one" with the game (and life for that matter) I thought it might be a good place to ask the corollary question (i.e. if the first question is "what"...the second question might be "how").
Thanks.
Fammy
|
lacky
STTF-HUC Champion
Reged: 04/05/04
Posts: 3021
Loc: Boise
|
|
I would say the best way to practice reads without actually playing is pick a tourniment you are interested in, preferably one at about your buyin level, as people do play deferent at different levels. Pick a table, or maybe 2, and focus on every hand played. throughout the hand, try to put the players involved on hands. so, maybe it would be, early position limps (wide range) agressive mid position raises (well, probably decent hand, but he raises alot, could be alot of things. folds around to early limper, who reraises pretty big (hmm, he must be pretty strong to play that that way, maybe AKs or big pair) and mid raiser calls for a fair amount of his chips (hmm, he cant have AA or he would raise, so maybe hi pair, not AA, maybe AK) etc, etc.
you will often be wrong, but the more you do it the easier it gets.
|
cougar62
addict
Reged: 03/04/06
Posts: 485
|
|
Quote:
That's the most enlightening and helpful thing I have ever read about poker.
Thank you, Gigabet.
Irieguy
And there's nothing I could possibly add, so just keeping this on the front page because everyone who enters this forum should read this post. Awesome job Gigabet.
|
The Yugoslavian
STTF-HUC II Champion
Reged: 09/24/04
Posts: 7718
Loc: back from beyond the grave
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
That's the most enlightening and helpful thing I have ever read about poker.
Thank you, Gigabet.
Irieguy
And there's nothing I could possibly add, so just keeping this on the front page because everyone who enters this forum should read this post. Awesome job Gigabet.
I still remember reading this at work like 5 minutes after it was posted...printing it out...reading it again. Letting my voice mail pick up client calls...reading it again...and then walking outside to a warm, sunny day and hearing the birds chirp and everything being right in the world.
Ahhhhh
Yugoslav who isn't making this up
|
w33ktight
veteran
Reged: 05/18/06
Posts: 1389
Loc: Michigan
|
|
You have a gift to put something like that into words. Amazing. I am printing this and putting it on my wall above my computer.
|
ThatsNotFunny
stranger
Reged: 11/07/07
Posts: 6
|
|
That’s some love-fest from the follow-up posts. However, there’s a fundamental problem with it.
If all we’re talking about is blood, sweat, and tears, such as with playing football or similiar, then the argument holds up. However, many poker players have financial hardships resulting from their play, and continuing to play is sometimes not a mark of perseverance but of stupidity. Particularly when their livelihoods (or marriages) are at stake. This is where being a “quitter” is the best thing, rather than rationalizing oneself into financial and/or relationship oblivion.
|
grasiu
newbie
Reged: 11/09/05
Posts: 49
|
|
Hmm... I don't have thousands nor even hundredths of post like some of the OP followers. And I want to present a bit opposite oppinion than most of them, so it may turn out harsh, but I'll do it anyway.
I liked the first post. Quite much. But I don't feel like printing it and reading all over again. I don't feel it changes my life or I shall stop anwsering the phone and walk out to listen to the birds.
All I feel is that it is a nice, soul warming up post, but anyway with some flaws.
First: Failures exist. If someone keeps losing money (debts, family problems, etc depth) because he keeps saing "there is no failure when I lose", than... that IS a failure. And they exist even if you don't fall into debts or family problems. You shouldn't care about one session results. You definately shouldn't feel bad or shamed when you lose. If you ever think how you would look among your poker friends, because you lose this is bad (this is a failure ). And this is one thing that the OP put out very well btw. But anyway failure exist :/ I wish it hadn't.
Second: You can't put everone on exact hand while 8-tabling. Not to mention that putting smn on exact hand, not range is quite a mistake (reffering to HoH fe.). If you can do such thing while 8-tabling you are natural born poker killer and you don't need to read that forum anyway :P Again there is just a nice but obvious observation, that you should concentrate on your game *and opponents*, not watch TV or post on 2+2 (sic :P) while playing. But again that is nothing new.
As I said earlier I liked the oryginal post. But it doesn't blow me away. Am I the only one such ignorant? Anyway: don't care about short term results, care about long term ones, play your opponents not only your cards, don't ever get a feeling that you can't win, don't feel down and luck on the tables 
PS - "It's hard work. Gambling. Playing poker. Don't let anyone tell you different. Think about what it's like sitting at a poker table with people whose only goal is to cut your throat, take your money, and leave you out back talking to yourself about what went wrong inside. That probably sounds harsh. But that's the way it is at the poker table. If you don't believe me, then you're the lamb that's going off to the slaughter." - Stu Ungar
|