Terms & Conditions

Internet Magazine

Non–US new players
Get five 2+2 books


Order Books
Book Translations
Forum Login
 
 
Expand All   Collapse All

 Two Plus Two 
2+2 Magazine Forum
Special Sklansky Forum
2+2 Pokercast
About the Forums

 General Poker Discussion 
Beginners Questions
Books and Publications
Televised Poker
News, Views, and Gossip
Brick and Mortar
Home Poker
Beats, Brags, and Variance
Poker Theory
Poker Legislation

 Coaching/Training 
StoxPoker
DeucesCracked

 German Forums 
Poker Allgemein
Strategie: Holdem NL cash
Strategie: Sonstige
Internet/Online
BBV
Small Talk
German Poker News

 French Forums 
Forum francophone
Strategie
BBV (French)

 Limit Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes Limit
Medium Stakes Limit
Small Stakes Limit
Micro Stakes Limit
Mid-High Short-handed
Small Stakes Shorthanded
Limit––>NL

 PL/NL Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes
Medium Stakes
Small Stakes
Micro Stakes
Small-High Full Ring
Micro Full Ring

 Tournament Poker 
Small Stakes MTT
High Stakes MTT
MTT Community
STT Strategy
Tournament Circuit

 Other Poker 
Omaha/8
Omaha High
Stud
Heads Up Poker
Other Poker Games

 General Gambling 
Probability
Psychology
Sports Betting
Other Gambling Games
Entertainment Betting

 Internet Gambling 
Internet Gambling
Internet Bonuses
Affiliates/RakeBack
Software

 2+2 Communities 
Other Other Topics
The Lounge: Discussion+Review
El Diablo's General Discussion
BBV4Life

 Other Topics 
Golf
Sporting Events
Politics
Business, Finance, and Investing
Travel
Science, Math, and Philosophy
Health and Fitness
Student Life
Puzzles and Other Games
Video Games
Laughs or Links!
Computer Technical Help
Sponsored Support Forums
RakebackNetwork
RakeReduction.com
Other Links
Books
Authors
Abbreviations
Calendar
Order Books
Books by Others
Favorite Links
Feedback
Advertising Information
Home
Posting Hints
Privacy Notice
Forum Archives

The 2+2 Forums

Before using this Forum, please refer to the Terms and Conditions (Last modified: 2/26/2006)

Be sure to read the   Two Plus Two Internet Magazine

This is an archive. The main forums are here

These forums are read only.


 
UBB.threads™ Groupee, Inc.

General Poker Discussion >> Poker Legislation

Pages: 1
dlk9s
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 11/28/04
Posts: 3410
Loc: It's not gonna happen.
Canned response from Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) - not ALL bad
      #12541244 - 10/17/07 11:36 AM

I plan on writing another personal letter to my reps, but I recently sent the stock PPA letter in advance of the PPA D.C. get together. While I have absolutely no hope of making any headway with my Senators and Representative here in Georgia (BRIGHT RED STATE), I figured I'd give it a shot.

I got a canned response back from Saxby Chambliss which contained most of what I expected, but the end did show a slight glimmer of hope. I have bolded that part.

Quote:

Thank you for contacting me regarding internet poker and the Unlawful Internet Gambling Act (UIGA). I appreciate hearing from you.



The UIGA was included in the final passage of H.R. 4954, the "Port Security Improvement Act of 2006," and was signed into law (P.L. 109-347) by President Bush on October 13, 2006.



I support placing a ban on internet gambling, and I supported the final passage of this bill. The National Gambling Impact Study Commission documented, and Senate and House hearings confirmed, that internet gambling was growing at an explosive rate. Because the internet can be used anonymously, the danger existed that access to internet gambling would be abused by underage children. In most instances, a would-be gambler merely needed to fill out a registration form in order to play. Most sites relied on the registrant to disclose his or her correct age and the sites made little or not attempt to verify the accuracy of the information. Underage gamblers could easily use their parents' credit cards or even their own credit and debit cards to register and set up accounts.



While I believe P.L 109-347 is a good law intended to protect children and reduce crime, I do understand the concerns of many internet poker players who will be affected by this new law. Should legislation regarding a poker "skill game exemption" come before the Senate for debate, I will give your views consideration.




Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Azizal
enthusiast


Reged: 02/26/05
Posts: 268
Loc: Atlanta
Re: Canned response from Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) - not ALL bad [Re: dlk9s]
      #12541885 - 10/17/07 12:30 PM

Quote:

I plan on writing another personal letter to my reps, but I recently sent the stock PPA letter in advance of the PPA D.C. get together. While I have absolutely no hope of making any headway with my Senators and Representative here in Georgia (BRIGHT RED STATE), I figured I'd give it a shot.

I got a canned response back from Saxby Chambliss which contained most of what I expected, but the end did show a slight glimmer of hope. I have bolded that part.

Quote:

Thank you for contacting me regarding internet poker and the Unlawful Internet Gambling Act (UIGA). I appreciate hearing from you.



The UIGA was included in the final passage of H.R. 4954, the "Port Security Improvement Act of 2006," and was signed into law (P.L. 109-347) by President Bush on October 13, 2006.



I support placing a ban on internet gambling, and I supported the final passage of this bill. The National Gambling Impact Study Commission documented, and Senate and House hearings confirmed, that internet gambling was growing at an explosive rate. Because the internet can be used anonymously, the danger existed that access to internet gambling would be abused by underage children. In most instances, a would-be gambler merely needed to fill out a registration form in order to play. Most sites relied on the registrant to disclose his or her correct age and the sites made little or not attempt to verify the accuracy of the information. Underage gamblers could easily use their parents' credit cards or even their own credit and debit cards to register and set up accounts.



While I believe P.L 109-347 is a good law intended to protect children and reduce crime, I do understand the concerns of many internet poker players who will be affected by this new law. Should legislation regarding a poker "skill game exemption" come before the Senate for debate, I will give your views consideration.







that does sound better than I expected it would. Seems like several politicians are softening up.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
whangarei
old hand


Reged: 09/08/06
Posts: 857
Loc: I :heart: Stars
Re: Canned response from Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) - not ALL bad [Re: dlk9s]
      #12542434 - 10/17/07 01:12 PM

That does sound pretty encouraging. A Skills game bill would be the nuts!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PPAdc
newbie


Reged: 08/02/07
Posts: 28
Re: Canned response from Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) - not ALL bad [Re: Azizal]
      #12542455 - 10/17/07 01:13 PM

Yes, a PPA member forwarded us this response. Please know that we are attempting to meet with the Senator or at least his staff during our Washington Fly-In.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TheEngineer
PPA Board Member


Reged: 04/04/05
Posts: 2730
Loc: USA
Re: Canned response from Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) - not ALL bad [Re: dlk9s]
      #12547552 - 10/17/07 06:43 PM

I'm glad to see this softening. I hope it's a harbinger of things to come.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 9 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Berge20, Ryan Beal, Performify, 4_2_it, Mike Haven 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 535

Rate this topic

Jump to

contact us 2+2 Publishing

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5



Message Boards and Forums Directory

Pages provided by ConJelCo