Terms & Conditions

Internet Magazine

Non–US new players
Get five 2+2 books


Order Books
Book Translations
Forum Login
 
 
Expand All   Collapse All

 Two Plus Two 
2+2 Magazine Forum
Special Sklansky Forum
2+2 Pokercast
About the Forums

 General Poker Discussion 
Beginners Questions
Books and Publications
Televised Poker
News, Views, and Gossip
Brick and Mortar
Home Poker
Beats, Brags, and Variance
Poker Theory
Poker Legislation

 Coaching/Training 
StoxPoker
DeucesCracked

 German Forums 
Poker Allgemein
Strategie: Holdem NL cash
Strategie: Sonstige
Internet/Online
BBV
Small Talk
German Poker News

 French Forums 
Forum francophone
Strategie
BBV (French)

 Limit Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes Limit
Medium Stakes Limit
Small Stakes Limit
Micro Stakes Limit
Mid-High Short-handed
Small Stakes Shorthanded
Limit––>NL

 PL/NL Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes
Medium Stakes
Small Stakes
Micro Stakes
Small-High Full Ring
Micro Full Ring

 Tournament Poker 
Small Stakes MTT
High Stakes MTT
MTT Community
STT Strategy
Tournament Circuit

 Other Poker 
Omaha/8
Omaha High
Stud
Heads Up Poker
Other Poker Games

 General Gambling 
Probability
Psychology
Sports Betting
Other Gambling Games
Entertainment Betting

 Internet Gambling 
Internet Gambling
Internet Bonuses
Affiliates/RakeBack
Software

 2+2 Communities 
Other Other Topics
The Lounge: Discussion+Review
El Diablo's General Discussion
BBV4Life

 Other Topics 
Golf
Sporting Events
Politics
Business, Finance, and Investing
Travel
Science, Math, and Philosophy
Health and Fitness
Student Life
Puzzles and Other Games
Video Games
Laughs or Links!
Computer Technical Help
Sponsored Support Forums
RakebackNetwork
RakeReduction.com
Other Links
Books
Authors
Abbreviations
Calendar
Order Books
Books by Others
Favorite Links
Feedback
Advertising Information
Home
Posting Hints
Privacy Notice
Forum Archives

The 2+2 Forums

Before using this Forum, please refer to the Terms and Conditions (Last modified: 2/26/2006)

Be sure to read the   Two Plus Two Internet Magazine

This is an archive. The main forums are here

These forums are read only.


 
UBB.threads™ Groupee, Inc.

PL/NL Texas Hold'em >> Micro Stakes

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >> (show all)
ama0330Moderator
more whining, less poker


Reged: 04/20/06
Posts: 5704
Loc: Crushing
**** PSA - Losing as a favourite ****
      #10413550 - 05/17/07 04:20 PM

Hello microballers,

A friendly Public Service Announcement for you all.

In poker we deal with EV, which simply translated means "betting our money when we are a mathematical favourite, and not betting when we aren't". We all know that when you are a 60/40 favourite, you should come out with the mad monies when the river is all said and done. Right?

WRONGGGGGG!

This may seem simple to most of you, but when we are talking equity edges in poker, they are very, VERY slim. What I mean by that is that one of the best edges you can have in poker (all in with AA versus AK preflop) is still only a 10:1 shot to hold up. That kind of edge is only offered to us VERY rarely in typical play. What we usually deal with are edges like holding a set versus a flush draw (a 3:1 edge) having our opponent draw to 3 outs (70:30). Edges of 60-65% are still very good and are more common.

What you need to realise is that when you hold an equity edge of 70%, you are a favourite, BUT if you were to play the situation 100 times, you are guaranteed to lose 30 times. If you talk about a 2:1 edge (a big edge in NLHE), if you run it 100 times, you are supposed to lose 33 times in addition to winning your 66 times.

My point is, if you get it all in with 70% equity and lose, then immediately think "I was a favourite. I was supposed to win that pot", you are seriously deluding yourself and you need to properly understand what it is to have an equity edge. An equity edge is NOT a golden stamp saying "Sup dude! Ship the monies!". It just doesn't work like that. A 60% edge means you win 60 times out of 100, and lose40 times out of 100. Thats right...40 times out of 100 you are mathematically destined to lose. We are all very happy when our edges hold up, but when we lose, how often do we say "oh well, 70% isn't a lock. You gotta lose those ones sometimes".

NEVER! We say "[censored] HELL 70% EQUITY WTF HOW DID I LOSE THAT WITH SUCH A HUGE [censored] EDGE JESUS I RUN SO BAD BLAERHGJHWKJEGHWEJKH" - right? Yes I'm right. Look how many stamps there are in the cheese thread.

SO.

Consider this new rule.


"The only time you can be truly justified in complaining about losing with an equity edge is if you had your opponent drawing dead on the turn and the dealer dealt a 6th card to give you opponent the best hand, and no-one said anything and the floor ruled that the 6th card was legal and there was nothing you could do about it"

or, more realistically,

"You cant complain about losing with an equity edge in one specific hand, you can only complain about losing with an equity edge when mathematical variance has evened out. Given that nobody knows how long "long term" actually means, you can't really ever complain about losing with an equity edge".


Hopefully now you have a better understanding of what it means to be a "favourite" in an all in confrontation. Sometimes you don't just lose, sometimes you HAVE to lose.

Get it?



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PJo336
BOOOOOOOOOOM


Reged: 03/27/07
Posts: 3924
Loc: N.O.Y.B. imo
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: ama0330]
      #10413563 - 05/17/07 04:21 PM






!!!!!!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jafeather
veteran


Reged: 05/18/06
Posts: 1391
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: PJo336]
      #10413646 - 05/17/07 04:26 PM

A) Everything you said is very ture.

B) It's horribly sad that this needs to be said.

C) It's even more horribly sad that the people that really need to read and understand OP may read, but are unlikely to ever understand, OP.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Skleice
addict


Reged: 10/31/06
Posts: 425
Loc: the short bus
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: PJo336]
      #10413654 - 05/17/07 04:26 PM

Seems like somebody got stuck listening to too many bad beat stories...

BBV.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ama0330Moderator
more whining, less poker


Reged: 04/20/06
Posts: 5704
Loc: Crushing
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: jafeather]
      #10413674 - 05/17/07 04:28 PM

Quote:

A) Everything you said is very ture.

B) It's horribly sad that this needs to be said.

C) It's even more horribly sad that the people that really need to read and understand OP may read, but are unlikely to ever understand, OP.




Yeah but I had to try, right?

I wonder how many people lose as a 70% favourite and consider that they may be running hot? Something to think about there.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PJo336
BOOOOOOOOOOM


Reged: 03/27/07
Posts: 3924
Loc: N.O.Y.B. imo
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: ama0330]
      #10413796 - 05/17/07 04:35 PM

lol
"if you run it 100 times, you are supposed to lose 33 times in addition to winning your 66 times."

33+66= 100!!!
haha just messing I fully endorse the message of this post, but I doubt even a good description will change anything for most.
Everyone needs to do what I have done. Get one friend who never says ANYTHING but bad beat stories. After 1 month if you ever felt like mentioning a bad beat to anyone without thinking of how annoying your friend is I would be surprised.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Panic__NL
addict


Reged: 12/28/06
Posts: 666
Loc: Netherlands, Rotterdam
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: ama0330]
      #10413859 - 05/17/07 04:39 PM

Nice post, some people think if they hold AA and their opponent hold AK, they deserve to win. Wrong thought, they will win most of the time, but getting that into your brain is hard sometimes. Best you can do is put your money in when you are ahead.
Still it is against the human emotion, be happy when the money goes in when you are ahead but still loose, be mad at yourself when the money goes in when you are behind but win by a suckout.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jafeather
veteran


Reged: 05/18/06
Posts: 1391
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: Panic__NL]
      #10414024 - 05/17/07 04:48 PM

An mathematical equation on the amplification of this thought process caused by online play by standard donk to whom OP is aimed:

Where,

X = the number times the favorite hand fails to hold up

Y = (avg # of online hands per hour) - (avg # of b&m hands per hour)

X * Y = rigged


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Knight Vision
veteran


Reged: 03/08/06
Posts: 1367
Loc: Stacking off with TPTK
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: jafeather]
      #10414095 - 05/17/07 04:53 PM

Quote:

An mathematical equation on the amplification of this thought process caused by online play by standard donk to whom OP is aimed:

Where,

X = the number times the favorite hand fails to hold up

Y = (avg # of online hands per hour) - (avg # of b&m hands per hour)

X * Y = rigged




Online players make such bad calls though. Factor that in. kthx


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kaz2107
Jumpman HOLLA!


Reged: 07/26/05
Posts: 2943
Loc: Hating CO pro sports atm
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: Knight Vision]
      #10414176 - 05/17/07 04:58 PM

ama make me a kool stamp to use

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
avfletch
veteran


Reged: 10/23/05
Posts: 1491
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: Knight Vision]
      #10414222 - 05/17/07 05:01 PM



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PJo336
BOOOOOOOOOOM


Reged: 03/27/07
Posts: 3924
Loc: N.O.Y.B. imo
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: avfletch]
      #10414276 - 05/17/07 05:05 PM

Less whining, more poker for your title

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Keys Myaths
old hand


Reged: 02/08/06
Posts: 1132
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: PJo336]
      #10414358 - 05/17/07 05:11 PM

I love this thread.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
carnivalhobo
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 01/05/06
Posts: 5779
Loc: one time
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: PJo336]
      #10414378 - 05/17/07 05:12 PM

something that goes along with this IMO is a sense of entitlement we sometimes get as people who have spend hundreds of hours playing and studying this sick game. It doesnt owe you anything, you dont deserve to win any more than joe mcfish who buys in for 73bbs and playing and 2 suited.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ama0330Moderator
more whining, less poker


Reged: 04/20/06
Posts: 5704
Loc: Crushing
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: kaz2107]
      #10414453 - 05/17/07 05:16 PM

Quote:

ama make me a kool stamp to use




lol im on it kaz


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
yeesh
newbie


Reged: 05/15/07
Posts: 43
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: ama0330]
      #10416025 - 05/17/07 07:17 PM

Quote:



What you need to realise is that when you hold an equity edge of 70%, you are a favourite, BUT if you were to play the situation 100 times, you are guaranteed to lose 30 times




Nice post. I would only add that this is only true if these 100 hands took place in a theoretical vacuum. It's possible to be a 70% equity favorite and lose all 100 hands, and it's possible to win all 100 hands. But if you were to play an infinite number of hands, then yes, you are guaranteed to win 70% and lose 30%.
Running bad or running good often means when our results are not corresponding with our equity over an infinite number of hands.

Edited by yeesh (05/17/07 07:21 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
warwickphil
stranger


Reged: 05/17/07
Posts: 22
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: yeesh]
      #10416042 - 05/17/07 07:19 PM

A+++ post.

My number one pet hate is my friends constantly telling me how "unlucky" they are...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
matrix
there is NO spoon


Reged: 09/04/05
Posts: 7050
Loc: UK
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: warwickphil]
      #10416148 - 05/17/07 07:28 PM

*bump*

can everyone who's read this already READ IT AGAIN.

please keep reading it until it sinks in.

ama


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Angrymoog
addict


Reged: 03/05/05
Posts: 506
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: warwickphil]
      #10416261 - 05/17/07 07:38 PM

Until recently, I had some not insignificant problems with tilting due to losing these situations. Or thinking a pot was mine before the hand was finished being dealt. This wasn't the break-my-keyboard-and-smash-the-pieces-through-my-monitor type tilt. It was more subtle. The kind of tilt where you're certain you're not on tilt.

Fortunately, I am fairly disciplined and decided to cash out and stop playing until I felt I was level again. I try my best to be objective in each hand, and so far it seems to be working well.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jgunnip
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 10/06/04
Posts: 5321
Loc: shipping ironman bonus medals
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: carnivalhobo]
      #10416643 - 05/17/07 08:10 PM

Quote:

something that goes along with this IMO is a sense of entitlement we sometimes get as people who have spend hundreds of hours playing and studying this sick game. It doesnt owe you anything, you dont deserve to win any more than joe mcfish who buys in for 73bbs and playing and 2 suited.




good post


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RUDIKS
stranger


Reged: 05/14/07
Posts: 21
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: jgunnip]
      #10417244 - 05/17/07 09:04 PM

nice post man

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EMcModerator
The People's Mod


Reged: 02/24/05
Posts: 7663
Loc: LETS GO YANKEES!!
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: RUDIKS]
      #10417324 - 05/17/07 09:10 PM

pls note the new title.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DannyOcean_
BBV4L VP of Advertising, Drawball Division


Reged: 09/30/06
Posts: 4232
Loc: so it goes...
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: EMc]
      #10417336 - 05/17/07 09:11 PM

omg its backwards... head asplode

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Chomp
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 05/22/06
Posts: 2183
Loc: Pretty terrible at poker
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: DannyOcean_]
      #10417459 - 05/17/07 09:22 PM

I am 100% guilty of not fully internalising this very simple concept.

Good post Ama.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Vyse
Mrs Pink


Reged: 10/29/06
Posts: 4218
Loc: not tipping
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: Chomp]
      #10417698 - 05/17/07 09:39 PM

I get it. That doesn't mean there's anything wrong with bitching. We bitch because we know people are in the same boat as us, and as humans it helps us feel much better about our predicament when we're not alone. People usually whine when it's four, five, six hands in a short period of time, not one, two, or three. There's nothing wrong with that.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
thac
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 04/30/06
Posts: 9941
Loc: Go Buckeyes imo
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: Vyse]
      #10417823 - 05/17/07 09:49 PM

ama - I've reconsidered you as a person. At first I thought you were kinda snobby and had a bit of a SSNL ego, but in the last couple months, I've grown fond of your posts.



I agree with everything, quit whining and playyyyy!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
corsakh
Carpal /'Tunnel


Reged: 08/13/06
Posts: 3991
Loc: Kitty said what?
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: kaz2107]
      #10418449 - 05/17/07 10:34 PM

Mm... Unfortunealty humans are emotional beings and we tend to go on tilt. Just compare your big winning streaks to your big loosing streaks and you will see that tilt comprises a huge fraction of your losses.

Second, all of us have very limited bankrolls, and a dice can easily roll "one" more than 20 times in a row.

Third, when I have 4 to 1 edge, I tend to put all my money into the middle which is often two days work. Then I loose on a suck out I have to grind back for several days cent by cent stealing blinds and making cbets that get no respect after a big loss anyway

Edited by corsakh (05/17/07 10:36 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Knight Vision
veteran


Reged: 03/08/06
Posts: 1367
Loc: Stacking off with TPTK
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: corsakh]
      #10420342 - 05/18/07 12:50 AM

your 2nd and 3rd points are why you have a first point. Only problem is 2 and 3 are mathematically unfounded in the long run.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
corsakh
Carpal /'Tunnel


Reged: 08/13/06
Posts: 3991
Loc: Kitty said what?
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: Knight Vision]
      #10421716 - 05/18/07 03:02 AM

I'm not even gonna bother explaining you the basics of a function on an infinite scale, so you are right.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ama0330Moderator
more whining, less poker


Reged: 04/20/06
Posts: 5704
Loc: Crushing
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: thac]
      #10422592 - 05/18/07 05:23 AM

Quote:

ama - I've reconsidered you as a person. At first I thought you were kinda snobby and had a bit of a SSNL ego, but in the last couple months, I've grown fond of your posts.



I agree with everything, quit whining and playyyyy!






Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Superman26gt
*


Reged: 11/13/05
Posts: 500
Loc: The root of your downswing.
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: jafeather]
      #10422675 - 05/18/07 05:45 AM

Sticky this post definitely. Great job Ama!

Quote:

B) It's horribly sad that this needs to be said.




I just figured this out last month



Edit: I just want to express my concern on this being a sticky again..this should be rule #1 in learning poker, hands down.

Edited by Superman26gt (05/18/07 05:58 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jouster777
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 11/23/05
Posts: 1825
Loc: LAG right, nit left
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: ama0330]
      #10423023 - 05/18/07 07:17 AM

Making big Sklansky bucks:
1st time in a session: mildly annoying/amusing
2nd time: mildly annoying
3rd time: uncomfortable itch
4th time: real annoyance...leave if you aren't sure you are playing your A game
5th time: less poker, more whining


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kaz2107
Jumpman HOLLA!


Reged: 07/26/05
Posts: 2943
Loc: Hating CO pro sports atm
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: Jouster777]
      #10429014 - 05/18/07 04:38 PM

PAGING ama...
n e ideas on my stamp?!?!?!

if not i was thinkin either "ship it holla" or "instaprestopush"

wudya think!?!?!?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
MidwestPokerJohn
stranger


Reged: 05/19/07
Posts: 4
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: ama0330]
      #10437572 - 05/19/07 11:28 AM

But he only had one out! It just ain't fair!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jgunnip
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 10/06/04
Posts: 5321
Loc: shipping ironman bonus medals
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: MidwestPokerJohn]
      #10448852 - 05/20/07 03:25 PM

bump for awesomeness

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
eigenvalue
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 08/14/06
Posts: 1632
Loc: Leaving AP
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: ama0330]
      #10449274 - 05/20/07 04:03 PM

One additional thing you should think about, too!

Let's assume you are all-in on the flop with say 2-pair vs a flush draw and you have 66% equity to win a pot of $100. Now, if you win the showdown, you win $100. But mathematically, you should have won only $66. The remaining $33 you won simply because you were lucky and Villain was unlucky in that part of the pot.

Let's assume you play 3 of these hands during a given period and you win all 3. Every time you might think: Well, I was the favorite, it's normal. Nothing is normal! You won 3 times a part of 33$ due to good luck. After winning 3 pots like that in a row, you earned $100 - one complete pot of that kind - simply because you were lucky!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Monster207
enthusiast


Reged: 05/06/07
Posts: 300
Loc: WTF IS JUICE?!?!
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: eigenvalue]
      #10450671 - 05/20/07 06:00 PM

this is an awesome post, although i understand the concept I must admit I am guilty of thinking that just because i was a 70/30 favorite or whatever I was always entitled to win. This is great and will probably help with my insane ninja monkey tilt.

btw Jouster777 i almost [censored] my pants laughing at your icon


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Vyse
Mrs Pink


Reged: 10/29/06
Posts: 4218
Loc: not tipping
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: eigenvalue]
      #10451065 - 05/20/07 06:30 PM

Quote:

One additional thing you should think about, too!

Let's assume you are all-in on the flop with say 2-pair vs a flush draw and you have 66% equity to win a pot of $100. Now, if you win the showdown, you win $100. But mathematically, you should have won only $66. The remaining $33 you won simply because you were lucky and Villain was unlucky in that part of the pot.

Let's assume you play 3 of these hands during a given period and you win all 3. Every time you might think: Well, I was the favorite, it's normal. Nothing is normal! You won 3 times a part of 33$ due to good luck. After winning 3 pots like that in a row, you earned $100 - one complete pot of that kind - simply because you were lucky!




Very good point btw


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JJBuffone
old hand


Reged: 11/19/06
Posts: 914
Loc: NYC
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: Vyse]
      #10534354 - 05/26/07 07:13 PM

Awesome post!! Thanks for this.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jmgambler
old hand


Reged: 10/30/04
Posts: 943
Loc: Under The Gun
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: ama0330]
      #10534555 - 05/26/07 07:30 PM

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.10/$0.25 Blinds - 6 Players - (http://www.legopoker.com/hh/)

SB: $25.30
BB: $32
UTG: $17.70
MP: $24.55
Hero (CO): $22
BTN: $29

Preflop: Hero is dealt Q Qd (6 Players)
2 folds, Hero raises to $1, BTN folds, SB calls $0.90, BB folds

Flop: ($2.25) Q 4 J (2 Players)
SB bets $1.60, Hero calls $1.60

Turn: ($5.45) A (2 Players)
SB bets $4, Hero calls $4

River: ($13.45) A (2 Players)
SB bets $8, Hero raises all-in to $15.40, SB calls $7.40

Pot Size: $44.25 ($2.15 Rake)

SB had A J (a full house, Aces full of Jacks)
Hero had Q Q (a full house, Queens full of Aces)

This post is rubbish I SHOULD HAVE WON THIS HAND!!!!! I only had like 98% equity on the flop......




Nice post Ama


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PJo336
BOOOOOOOOOOM


Reged: 03/27/07
Posts: 3924
Loc: N.O.Y.B. imo
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: jmgambler]
      #10534589 - 05/26/07 07:34 PM

raise flop, ur fault

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mäkki
stranger


Reged: 04/18/07
Posts: 20
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: PJo336]
      #11359371 - 07/24/07 03:47 PM

hi, i've another example, somewhat similar to this one.
for example, i am living within a family with 4 other siblings, and my 2 parents of course. so all together we are 7 people. nobody of us has suffered any serious diseases up to now.

but if we assume that the possibility to sicken from cancer (or any other bad disease) is approximately 90% (i don't know the exact number, of course),
then the probability that nobody of my family suffers from cancer in their whole life is only about 45%.

so nobody of my family should think of a big, sudden stroke of fate, if one member of his/her family gets cancer...rather than whining, we should take care of our health and go to good medical doctors more often than...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Al P
old hand


Reged: 01/31/05
Posts: 796
Loc: Weighed down in the Undertow
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: mäkki]
      #11359831 - 07/24/07 04:10 PM

If you do "run bad" you probably won't play enough hands of poker in your lifetime to even things out. The same can be said about "running good".

For example I wrote a little program that can do billions of coinflips. Even after 10,000,000 flips it's possible that one side or the other is off by a few thousand. Now imagine each of those is a $1,000 flip and while you should be breakeven instead you're millions of dollars in the hole - while your opponent is up millions of dollars.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fees
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 02/19/07
Posts: 4162
Loc: Whats my motivation? LOLOLOLOL...
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: Al P]
      #11360006 - 07/24/07 04:19 PM

stars is rigged

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Capone
Banned


Reged: 07/08/07
Posts: 852
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: kaz2107]
      #11360230 - 07/24/07 04:31 PM

nice post

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kaz2107
Jumpman HOLLA!


Reged: 07/26/05
Posts: 2943
Loc: Hating CO pro sports atm
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: Capone]
      #11360321 - 07/24/07 04:37 PM

i have still yet to get a stamp. imma come to amsterdam or w/e u live and fight u

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Capone
Banned


Reged: 07/08/07
Posts: 852
Re: **** PSA - Losing as a favourite **** [Re: kaz2107]
      #11360378 - 07/24/07 04:41 PM

simple yet so many are guilty of this.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >> (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 16 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ama0330, ajmargarine, EMc, orange, Matt Flynn, Sunny Mehta, Mike Haven 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 2333

Rate this topic

Jump to

contact us 2+2 Publishing

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Message Boards and Forums Directory

Pages provided by ConJelCo