SukitTrebek
enthusiast
Reged: 02/07/06
Posts: 304
Loc: The day is mine!
|
|
Cliffnotes: I discovered NL bots on Full Tilt earlier this year and reported them. Full Tilt investigated them for many weeks and asked me to refrain from posting about them until the investigation was complete. At the end of March, the bots disappeared, almost assuredly having had their accounts frozen. A week ago, Full Tilt emailed me that their investigation had been concluded, thanked me for my help, but refused to provide any details about the bots or the investigation. Before I had a chance to make this post, the situation took an absurd new twist. The bot accounts have now begun playing again, presumably having been cleared by Full Tilt???
I apologize in advance for how insanely long this post is going to be. But because this thread will affect most people’s perception of the threat of bots and of Full Tilt, I’m going to make it pretty detailed.
I’ll start off with a picture. Here are the stats of four $200NL players on Full Tilt:
Clickable thumb 
These aren't just NL bots, but WINNING DEEPSTACK NL bots. The threat that everyone assumed was a few years away is already here.
In January, I decided to make the switch from limit to NL. I took a few weeks off from poker, but I setup my computer to datamine the 1/2 NL tables on Full Tilt during this time. One day, I decided to observe a few tables with the datamined pahud stats showing so that I could get a sense of new ranges for various stats in NL. I was taking a look at a player with setmining-type stats. He played 14/7 preflop, but played very tight postflop. Then I glanced at other tables and noticed his 14/7 preflop and tight postflop stats at each table. But wait, at one of the tables the screenname was different. At first, I assumed the setminer had probably just gotten up, and the stats hadn’t updated yet. Then I noticed that the second screenname had the same stats at other tables too. Holy [censored] [censored]!!!
At this point, I’m thinking these guys are likely bots, but several of the stats could be coincidences. So, I took a screen print of the entire pahud list of stats (like above) for one villain and put it up next to the same print screen for the other villain. Oh my god, every single one is almost the exact same!!! These guys are definitely bots. I just sat back in my chair stunned, watching them for a while, trying to absorb the significance of what I was watching. Jesus, this was at NL even. It’s one thing to talk about bots, but it’s quite sobering to actually see them playing in front of you.
FWIW, the time elapsed from when I opened the tables to when I placed the bots’ stats side by side was about ten minutes. I say this not to brag but to show how ridiculous it was that Full Tilt didn’t catch them on their own with access to all hh's (and I wasn't even looking for bots).
After a while, I started wondering how many other bots there were. I looked through both the other 1/2 tables and my database for more possible bots. I found a bunch of other players with similarish tight tag stats and finally decided just to take a screen print of the stats for every player who was around 14/7 preflop (probably 15-20 players). I lined all the screen prints up and noticed there was a third player with the same precise stats as the first two bots. The other dozen or so players had many similar stats with the three main bots, but there were major differences in one stat or another. I put them in a list of “Maybe, but probably not bots” and started focusing on the players 1ForTheThumb, Full_Tilting, and Mariojr.
Over the next couple days, I started playing again and would observe the bots’ tendencies. -First thing I noticed is simply how much they play. They played non-stop for several hours almost every day. They put in more hands than anyone else at 1/2. They are probably some of the highest volume players on the site at any game at any stakes. -Next, I noticed that the three bots never ever ever ever sat at the same table. For players that play so often, this would obviously be highly unlikely even over short periods of time. Yet, they played every day for months without sitting at the same tables. -All three accounts would sit down and get up at the same times. -Their betsizing was the same. They would virtually always make a pf raise to the size of the pot, reraise to 3x the original raise, and always make a continuation bet of around 75% of the pot (regardless of the number of players or the flop texture). -The bots would “think” excessively long times to make every single decision, even trivial ones. One hand: bot limps utg, fish minraises, six calls, back around to bot who takes 15 seconds before finally deciding to call getting like a million to one. Also, they would cbet almost every single flop yet they would still think for 10-15 seconds before they made the cbet, every single time. -Occasionally, the timing went the other way. In one hand, I flopped TPNK HU against one of the bots. I c/c bets from the bot on flop and turn. On the river, I made an absurd blocking bet of $5 into a $60 pot just to see how the bot would react. The bot insta insta insta folds. The micro-second I clicked bet, the bot folded. Even if they had nothing, a person would still have to think for half a second to consider whether they should bluffraise my silly looking bet. After that hand I decided there wasn’t the slightest doubt, I was definitely playing against a computer. -They never chatted (in the first several days I watched). This would change.
Up to this point, I had been fooling around with trying to exploit their tendencies but with little luck. After all, they played tight and would often have a pretty good hand. Finally I decided that before I turned them in, I was going to spend an entire night trying to exploit them every single hand no matter how much money I lost. No one else knows they’re bots yet, and if I could figure out a good strategy I might be able to make some decent money first.
My grand strategy was to get position on them on every table, cold call pf with any two cards if they raised, then raise the flop or float depending on the board texture. They were very crudely designed (they didn’t even consider the number of opponents or board texture for cbets), so I figured they’ll probably need a fairly exact hand value to stack off with, such as >=TPTK. If they called my flop raise or fired a second bullet, I’d give up. Otherwise I was going to make a play at every single pot they were involved in and see what happened. I mean if I can’t beat a bot, I must really suck at poker right?
So, that’s what I did. And it worked. Bot opens, I cc with 93o, flop comes Q52, bet, raise, fold. Bot opens, I cc with J6o, flop comes 922, bet, call, turn 3, check, bet, fold.
Hand after hand. Bot opens, I cc, cbet, raise, fold. At a different table, cbet, raise, fold. Again two minutes later, cbet, raise, fold. Again and again. (Granted sometimes he would have too much hand to fold, but overall it’s working quite well.)
I proceed to use my expert strategy for 3 hours, playing 20-30 hands specifically against the bots without them adjusting. I even started doing goofy stuff like bot opens, I minreraise, bot calls. I cbet 1/3 of the pot, bot folds. Next orbit, bot opens, I minreraise, bot folds. I’m going to be rich.
After a few hours had passed, a hand comes up where bot cbets, I raise, bot reraises, I fold. Didn’t think too much of it, the bots’ are going to have a hand sometimes. Then the very next hand I play against a bot, same progression, bot cbets, I raise, bot reraises, I fold. Hmmm. Two big hands in a row.
Then next hand that I play against the bots comes down like this. Bot raises pf, I cc (in the hand I happen to have ATs), flop AQ3. Bot cbets, I call. Turn 6. Bot checks (clearly having a pocket pair or giving up). I bet pot hoping it is programmed to make a loose call with Q or pp. Bot checkraises!!!!! WTF??? I’m positive it’s not sophisticated enough to take this line or be adjusting to me. Then, it hit me -- Oh my god I’m not playing the bot anymore!!!!!!!!
I just sat there shocked as my timer was running out. The hand now proceeded into one of the more bizarre situations of “levels” thinking. It seemed the bot owner came back to his computer and saw that the last couple dozen hands he played were against me, so he’s now supervising it. He knows I probably have any two cards floating him for the umpteenth time in a row. So, if he thinks I think I’m playing the bot, then he could easily just have an A or even be on a complete rebluff. Then if I think he thinks that, then AT is a giant hand here. Finally I push, he calls with AJo and I lose. AJ??? I’m thinking there’s no way the bot is programmed to take a stackadonk line with TP2K here. I’m now 90% sure the jig is up. It was inevitable the bot owner would catch on, but I thought it might take a few days.
In one of the ultimate ironies of the whole situation, I set out to exploit the bots and ended up getting re-exploited by the bot owner (donking off two buyins in the three previous confrontations). Luckily he made it obvious for me. If he had subtly just called my raises and bet later streets or reraised me only every few hands, I might have gone on raising it with 9 high all night before I finally became convinced I wasn’t playing the bots anymore.
I immediately stopped making moves against the bots and decided to call it a night shortly after. The next day I sat down to play and noticed that all three bots were playing, one at each of the 1/2 tables. I began loading tables, then I noticed Mariojr got up. Then Full_Tilting sits out and gets up. Same with 1ForTheThumb. Within 60 seconds of my sitting down all three bots simultaneously got up and quit. (IMO, them reacting simultaneously to my logging in is by itself pretty damning evidence against them). Ah, I know -- the bots were playing unsupervised and were instructed to watch for my logging in so they wouldn’t get exploited. This same scenario happened many more times in the subsequent weeks. Since it didn’t happen every time, the supervised/unsupervised argument made the most sense to me.
I go ahead and start playing anyway. Two hours later all the bots come back and sat down (within minutes of each other). I decide to play normal against them and immediately notice they are playing way differently from the normal bot patterns (not cbetting every flop, check/calling more). Finally, I see the bot chat for the first time, answering some question by another player. Sweet, now I can be 100% sure I’m playing the owner now.
That night, on 2/2/07, I sent in an in depth email to Full Tilt reporting the bots. I detailed the bots’ tendencies (as written above), my trying to exploit the bots’ predictability, the fact that the bot owner is aware he’s been spotted by me, and the subsequent “reaction” by the bots upon my logging on. I attached a picture of the three bots’ stats (through however many hands I had at the time) and I also attached a picture of the other dozen or so players’ stats who “might be bots but probably not.” I asked to have a simple reply sent upon receiving my email so I would know it didn’t get lost in the shuffle. I also asked to be notified when the investigation was complete so that I could post it on 2p2 for everyone to know about. I received an email back 45 minutes later from the initial support rep saying that they had received the email and were forwarding it on to their fraud department.
So, I waited. Wasn’t sure how long it would take to freeze the bot accounts and investigate any further ones, but I figured it wouldn’t take too long. I was serving them the whole case on a silver platter. Maybe take a few days. Who knows maybe even a week.
I waited one day, then two days, five days, a week, ten days. WTF? I figured the picture of the stats by itself would have prompted immediate action. On 2/11/07, I wrote a another email to support and forwarded my previous email. In the email, I ask “it’s been ten days since I sent you concrete proof of bots and I haven’t even gotten a response. What the [censored] are you guys doing????????????” I figured if I didn’t get a response from that, I never would. (I did want to wait if possible until the accounts were frozen so the bot owner couldn’t get his money out fast and more easily set up shop again. If he loses the thousands in the accounts at least that will be something.) I also tried to pm FTPDoug, but his pm box was full.
I waited again. A couple days passed, then five days. Finally on 2/17/07, I got a reply from Full Tilt’s fraud department. The investigator thanked me (no less than three times) for informing them of the situations and indicated that the stats “were particularly useful and will definitely be used as this case progresses.” He urged me not to post on 2p2 as it obviously would compromise the active investigation. Cool, it sounds like they’re finally getting everything taken care of. I got an update a few days later on 2/21/07 saying they were still investigating the three main accounts and others, and that it may take some time to complete everything. Nice, it looks like they’re ultimately taking this as seriously as they should be.
Since the bots hadn’t been removed yet, I was still playing against them every night on every table. For the first couple weeks following the initial night of trying to exploit them, I treated them like any other tight player. Every once in a while I’d make a move on them if I was already in the hand with them, but I mostly avoided them and just raised their blind every time. I was pretty sure the bot owner was supervising most of the time. From what I could tell he was letting the bots play pf and against other players and then overriding their postflop action when necessary in hands against me. Since he chatted occasionally now, I would constantly say “nh” to him to see if he would reply (indicating he was watching the tables at that time).
Eventually, I started picking out one part of the bots’ play I could still exploit. They played very tight in the blinds, in EP, and in MP, but in LP they play semi-lag and squeeze limpers all the time. Looking at one of the bot's position stats, his vpip and pfr in middle position is 14/3 (I can post more pt stats of the bots if anyone wants to see them). In the hijack, his vpip/pfr change all the way to 18/16. In addition, they would always make a large, pot-size raise pf, so it would be four limpers to the bot and he would make it like $12 every time with whatever hand he wasn’t going to fold.
So next thing you know, I started reraising out of the blinds and floating again only against this aspect. The bot owner adjusted a little, but not even close to enough. He started getting agitated and would talk smack to me when he won a hand against me. But he didn’t stop squeezing limpers or start calling me down light or rebluffing enough (honestly I don’t think he’s very good at poker, he just lucked into a good winning strategy for the bots.) We end up tangling countless times a night for weeks. While I did end up profiting from these encounters, it was still very –EV to have them at the table. The bots were definitely good enough to beat mediocre players and would stack bad players all the time. I can’t tell you how frustrating it would be watching some 60/25 retard 4bet ai with TPNK and impale himself on the bot’s obvious set. [censored] you bot, that should be my money. [censored] you Full Tilt, why are the bots even still here?
At some point, I noticed that I wasn’t seeing 1ForTheThumb around anymore. Didn’t think too much of it, still seeing the other two constantly. Then one day I noticed a new player named 0_Drunkenboxer who plays 14/7 preflop. I pulled up his full stats and started laughing. Hi bot.
In general, I couldn’t believe that Full Tilt hadn’t caught them on their own. It would have been difficult for them to have been more obvious. They evaded whatever screen scraping detection Full Tilt had. Full Tilt didn't notice their table selection. With regards to their playing patterns, seriously an intern looking for bots just with PokerTracker and access to all of the hand histories should have found them on his very first day. What would a bot have had to do get caught???? One day I searched around to see if I found anything on bots and Full Tilt. I was astounded when I see a post on Full Tilt’s own forum with the title “Oneforthethumb is a bot.” Granted his support for the argument wasn’t overwhelming (7 tables, lol), but if he had at any point emailed to support about 1ForTheThumb then it is just awful that they didn’t investigate the account then. (Also, I’m curious myself how long the bots have been playing. That thread is dated 11/20/06. If any 1/2 players see the bot names in their hh’s from earlier than that, please post the date.)
So anyways, time drags on regarding their investigation. February ends, most of March passes. I trade emails every once in a while with full tilt’s fraud investigations department. I ask which accounts were found to be bots, if any additional ones were found, what’s going to happen to the money, etc. Basically they just gave vague updates that the case is coming close to conclusion, no ability to confirm or deny anything but indicated I should refrain from tipping off the bot accounts. They can’t say anything until it’s over, but would pass along whatever little info they're able to at that time. I keep thinking wtf???? It’s been over a month since they’ve indicated they’re investigating them and six weeks since I sent the original email. How can it possibly take this long?
I end up playing more live poker and not at all online starting sometime at the end of March. However, I left my datamining computer running. I left town for a couple weeks and upon returning I brought up the datamining data. Poof, they’re gone. All three accounts disappeared on 3/27/07. On 4/12/07, I emailed Full Tilt indicating that I still hadn’t heard that the case was over. I noted that I could see the bots got removed, so what’s the story? They replied that the investigation is still ongoing. Uh, what? The accounts have now been frozen for two weeks and they’re still investigating? (I assumed that the bot owner had tried to withdrawal while Full Tilt continued their crazy long investigation, so they had to freeze the accounts while still nailing all the details down.) They assured me again that they would let me know when it was concluded.
By now, it’s the end of April. The seasons have even changed since I reported the bots. I was more perturbed when the bots were still playing, but still how can it just keep going on endlessly. Finally I just decide, screw it, the case is obviously over, I’ll just post everything on 2p2. Why keep waiting?
Before I got an opportunity, I received an email on 4/30/07 indicating the case has finally been closed. Well done, a mere 87 days after I first reported the bots. Full Tilt stated that they can’t give me any info due to their privacy policy, but that over 40 accounts were investigated. They stated that they couldn’t confirm or deny any action was taken. The email went on vaguely about how shortcomings from this case will be addressed in the future. Again, they thanked me for my help in any actions that may or may not have taken place.
It’s finally over. Weird that it took so long. Unfortunate that they wouldn’t provide me any details about any other bot accounts that got shut down too. Overall, pretty much what I expected though. Next chance I got, I would at last make the post and bring everyone up to speed on the bots getting removed.
I was wholly unprepared for what happened next. On this past Saturday, 5/5/07, I sat down to play a few hands online. I almost fell out of my seat when the first table I open, I see 0_Drunkenboxer sitting there. I open more tables and see Full_Tilting and Mariojr too. Each one sitting at a separate table again, all back to normal. I was completely floored. What?? Why??? But, how?? Am I hallucinating?? Wtfffffffffffffffffffffffdngknoasih;oghbawoisehighawoihesr’vgsperjbh’opej’thodpebroahjgkrnbesdgkjbekjbdrkgbvewers
Just seeing the usernames sitting at the tables again made me physically angry. What the [censored] has happened????? Timing-wise, the bot accounts have now returned shortly after Full Tilt said they completed their investigation. Did they possibly clear the accounts???????? After investigating them for months????? Did they somehow take action against the accounts without banning them????? Did they decide there wasn’t enough evidence to kick them off??????? There’s no way they could possibly be allowing bots to play on their site????? WHAT THE FUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK??????????????????
So I ask you. Please explain to me how any of this could be legitimate. I can’t come up with a scenario that accounts for half the circumstances, much less all of them. If you can’t either, please email support@fulltiltpoker.com with a link to this thread and ask them why they’re allowing bots to play on their site.
After a deluge of emails, we can only hope they’ll post a substantive response on the situation or actually remove the bots. (FTPDoug must be reading this thread thinking, “Oh man, how am I going to spin this one? [censored] it, there’s no spinning that picture, we suck. Wait, and then we reopened the accounts?? What?? What?? Hmm, I wonder if Stars is hiring.”)
Maybe the bots’ stats are just millions of coincidences. Maybe there is some plausible reason they always sit at different tables. Who knows? But to me, all of this looks pretty [censored] disgusting.
-Trebek
Edited by Mike Haven (05/10/07 11:17 AM)
|
AMT
Railbird Extraordinaire
Reged: 09/15/05
Posts: 9771
Loc: Watching my baby grinders take...
|
|
challenge full tilt on the clearing of their accounts. Use the phone, use the stats, be a douche. they will come through if youre right.
|
Ghostridah
newbie
Reged: 11/01/05
Posts: 40
|
|
very nice work, amazing..
|
DWarrior
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/09/05
Posts: 3106
Loc: stealing your food
|
|
It's very possible that this is a bot.
However, I've heard of a guy 24-tabling 6max...maybe this is just a sicker dude? It's very improbably, but one dude's 30-tabling SNGs on a 17" monitor, why couldn't another be 40-tabling on multiple monitors. This would also explain the slow reaction times, and the strategy you described, coupled with his HUD stats seems extremely unthinking (my guess is he's c-betting 100% of the time he's up against 1-2 villains, and checks whenever there's more). A lot of players play that way though, even at 6max.
Quote:
From what I could tell he was letting the bots play pf and against other players and then overriding their postflop action when necessary in hands against me.
To extend on this idea, I expect there to be a program by now that would take care of pre-flop strategy, and let the owner take over post-flop. I actually remember my friend considering buying one of these for Party Poker a little over a year ago.
|
TIEdup14
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/11/06
Posts: 3880
|
|
Awesome, amazing, eye-opening post.
I just kept reading and hoping it wouldnt end.
Thanks for the info.
|
Phil153
Notable Twit
Reged: 10/18/05
Posts: 4905
|
|
Full Tilt is listed as a bot safe, detection free site in the instructions on a prominent bot maker's website and has been for a long time. Clearly Full Tilt does not take action and does not care in spite of their claims to the contrary.
Quote:
Full Tilt investigated them for many weeks and asked me to refrain from posting about them until the investigation was complete.
Why don't they have a play history? What difference will a couple of weeks make? This sounds like they want to hold off bad publicity for as long as possible.
|
TimWillTell
enthusiast
Reged: 06/30/05
Posts: 366
|
|
Suppose there would be a total of 40 bots on FullTilt. Bots can make very long hours, playing multiple tables. A bot could easily generate 30,000 dollars rake each month. 40 bots easily could generate more than a million dollars rake each month. It would only hurt the pro's, fish don't care enough, site makes money, bots make money; everybody happy but the pro's.
I wish webcam-poker would take of!
|
MicroBob
Johnny Chan Spotter
Reged: 09/19/03
Posts: 29344
Loc: The cat is back by popular dem...
|
|
Quote:
Awesome, amazing, eye-opening post.
|
LuckyDevil
old hand
Reged: 01/19/05
Posts: 722
|
|
Normally i would look at a post that long, read a paragraph and move on to another thread, but that was very interesting. I will be emailing FTP about this and asking them for a response. Very scary to think what the games will be like as more and more bots arrive.
|
cwar
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 12/19/05
Posts: 2491
Loc: Cwar LLC
|
|
A very brief summary for the TL;DNR crowd: -Bots playing 200nl deepstacked profitably -They are semi-supervised and the owner may take over at random intervals -OP played the bots and exploited them and noticed that the owner would eventually come back -The bots got programmed not to sit with the OP -The bots played more hands at 200nl than anyone else yet never ever sat with eachother -FT did an extensive fraud check, froze the accounts, then re-opened them -This fraud check took about 2 months
Very very nice work OP.
|
Robby Box
member
Reged: 05/17/05
Posts: 132
|
|
Great Work!
I think that FTP should consider hiring you as a consultant. Don't take less than $50 an hour
|
LuckyDevil
old hand
Reged: 01/19/05
Posts: 722
|
|
I just emailed Full Tilt explaining my dissatisfaction in the way they are handling this serious matter. I advise everyone else to do the same, whether you have a FTP account or not.
|
cwar
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 12/19/05
Posts: 2491
Loc: Cwar LLC
|
|
Quote:
I just emailed Full Tilt explaining my dissatisfaction in the way they are handling this serious matter. I advise everyone else to do the same, whether you have a FTP account or not.
|
Roger Mainfield
addict
Reged: 05/25/06
Posts: 657
Loc: Thailand
|
|
This is sick, I think i'm gonna get datamining software to check this out at lower limits...
|
William
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/24/03
Posts: 3850
Loc: Forever Doomswitched ...
|
|
Very interesting post. I play at FT every day at those limits and recognize everything you write. I have also noticed that you haven't been playing that much the last few weeks so I can vouch that everything you say it's true.
I woukld be interested in knowing who else you have tagged as "might be a bot".
I will be emailing FT as well.
Good work!
|
TylerD
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 09/25/03
Posts: 3990
Loc: UK
|
|
Great post. Can't wait to hear FTP Doug's response.
|
lemming
enthusiast
Reged: 03/20/07
Posts: 347
|
|
This is some interesting stuff you wrote there... Great observations! Ever thought of becoming a private investigator? 
I'll be checking my PT database as well tonight, this might be happening on lower limits as well... Thanks for opening our naive eyes
|
stigmata
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 08/12/04
Posts: 4817
Loc: UK
|
|
Really solid work SukitTrebek. Well done.
First, I think everyone playing at FT should email them, citing this thread as incontrovertible evidence that these players are bots.
Second, perhaps we should establish some loose charter and/or rules for bot identification and reporting in the future. One issue I had with OP was his attempts to exploit the bots. This actually made the botter manually take over the bots, chat, and play more normally. Unfortunately, this could well have actually been the eventual ondoing of this case. Had he silently collected data without attempting to exploit the bots, the case would have been much more clear cut.
|
lemming
enthusiast
Reged: 03/20/07
Posts: 347
|
|
Well, as the bot-creator could manually "take over" the bots play and also "adjust" his play, it seems like the bots are still being developped... And for that reason I think OP has collected more than enough evidence with those two facts:
all have got EXACTLY same stats, over pretty much similar amount of hands (how can this possibly be a coincidence???) all accounts sit down on a table at the same time and NEVER at the same table (volume of hands played)
I think this case is very clear cut... How many hands do you really think he would have needed for this data to be a "clear cut case"? 100k with those stats, I mean come on! There are not even decimal places in these stats!
|
Adde
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 10/15/02
Posts: 2453
Loc: Sweden
|
|
Quote:
Awesome, amazing, eye-opening post.
|
Sniper
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/03/05
Posts: 12364
Loc: Finance Forum
|
|
Quote:
Great post. Can't wait to hear FTP Doug's response.
|
me999so
stranger
Reged: 08/20/06
Posts: 9
|
|
Thanks for the OP, I quit playing at Full Tilt until they respond adequately.
|
craig1120
old hand
Reged: 10/23/05
Posts: 844
|
|
Someone transfer me on Full Tilt. I will gladly drop down stakes to bust some bots.
|
MrGatorade
enthusiast
Reged: 03/26/06
Posts: 281
Loc: Hunting Bots
|
|
I HATE BOTS. If you want to watch a good limit bot.. Watch beatme1 that will only play 50-100 or 100-200. I am updating my site as we speak and it is getting an major upgrade about the bots on all 4 big sites.
|
scorer
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 01/13/06
Posts: 2530
|
|
great work OP
|
stigmata
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 08/12/04
Posts: 4817
Loc: UK
|
|
Quote:
I HATE BOTS. If you want to watch a good limit bot.. Watch beatme1 that will only play 50-100 or 100-200. I am updating my site as we speak and it is getting an major upgrade about the bots on all 4 big sites.
Nice idea, your site, but it needs work obviously.
However, I'm not sure what I feel about such an open system. If the botmakers know exactly how they are being identified, and know which bots have been highlighted, then they can react appropriately to this information. However, they are an underground organisation and we never know anything about them.
A better stategy might be to have a independent and private anti-bot thinktank/workgroup, made up solely of respected and known players, and funded by the 2+2 community.
Edited by stigmata (05/09/07 07:47 AM)
|
dchz
*
Reged: 03/04/06
Posts: 2511
Loc: cleaning my room, and bluffing...
|
|
MAY BE FULL TILT OWNS THE BOTS?
no? i guess that wouldn't make too much sense?
who knows, they better take care of this or else they ARE DONE!
|
Quanah Parker
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 05/31/06
Posts: 1762
Loc: Stoc:N2SmokNbears
|
|
Wow, very detailed post. Thank you.
Keep up the Bot Watch.
|
Allinlife
Sushi Lover
Reged: 09/23/04
Posts: 3207
Loc: Folder's club member
|
|
this is EPIC
gj OP let's hope this makes the sites take the bot issue more seriously.
|
dp13368
old hand
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 1064
Loc: 3-bet.n
|
|
Email sent.
FTPDoug & FTPSean,
Address this issue or you are going to lose many 2+2 regulars (HUMANS) to stars and other sites.
|
4_2_it
Donktastic
Reged: 07/12/05
Posts: 18437
Loc: Trying to be the shepherd
|
|
Wow, looks like my Spidey Sense telling me to leave FT was right 
FTDoug, I'll just quote Ricky Ricardo,
Quote:
You got some 'xplaining to do
|
HoosierAlum
addict
Reged: 10/03/06
Posts: 594
|
|
Nice post. Awaiting FTPs response...
|
BlueBear
veteran
Reged: 04/02/03
Posts: 1337
|
|
Fantastic and very well researched post, possibility the most important one this year. Amongst all the issues a pokersite worries about, the threat of bots must only come second to funding/legal issues.
Edited by BlueBear (05/09/07 10:55 AM)
|
Isura
Anonymous Hopeful
Reged: 08/25/04
Posts: 13926
Loc: Blogging Again
|
|
Good work OP. Another example showing how crappy a company Full Tilt is. It's sad, but it our industry, being endorsed by well-known pros means [censored].
|
1p0kerboy
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/14/03
Posts: 6026
Loc: 492k
|
|
FTP needs to respond to this thread. That is all.
|
NOSUP4U
enthusiast
Reged: 03/14/06
Posts: 275
|
|
Quote:
Thanks for the OP, I quit playing at Full Tilt until they respond adequately.
ditto. This in just about the most unacceptable thing for a site. I hope a response comes quickly.
Mark
|
jukofyork
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 09/16/04
Posts: 2551
Loc: Leeds, UK.
|
|
Great post! I can't wait to quote this the next time somebody posts "NL is safe - it's far too hard to make NL bots...".
Juk
|
NU Star
banned
Reged: 11/19/06
Posts: 4923
|
|
Quote:
Email sent.
FTPDoug & FTPSean,
Address this issue or you are going to lose many 2+2 regulars (HUMANS) to stars and other sites.
Sweet. This should more than make up for having to play with bots.
|
rgold79
member
Reged: 11/13/06
Posts: 187
|
|
Question: If the owner of the bot can take over for the bot at any time and play for himself, wouldn't that cause deviations in his overall statistics?
|
KurtSF
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 07/06/06
Posts: 3983
|
|
Wow. NH OP. Very well done.
Between the site being unusable due to lag and disconnects, and the fact that if they ever fix it I will be playing against bots, I will be withdrawing my money.
I will wait for FTP's response.
|
KurtSF
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 07/06/06
Posts: 3983
|
|
Quote:
Question: If the owner of the bot can take over for the bot at any time and play for himself, wouldn't that cause deviations in his overall statistics?
Thus the 1% c/r on flop and turn.
|
jukofyork
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 09/16/04
Posts: 2551
Loc: Leeds, UK.
|
|
Quote:
Question: If the owner of the bot can take over for the bot at any time and play for himself, wouldn't that cause deviations in his overall statistics?
Maybe the bot owner sits and watches them. If he wants to test out his strategy them probably he wouldn't want to take over, but if he sees one of them blatantly getting exploited then perhaps he has no choice (to both save himself $s and cover his tracks). Those stats are from a fairly decent sample, so a few "interventions" might not make so much difference in the long run.
Juk
|
questions
addict
Reged: 01/11/07
Posts: 611
|
|
How would a bot owner get paid? Are multiple accounts by one user allowed on FTP?
|
KurtSF
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 07/06/06
Posts: 3983
|
|
I assume their mother/father/brothers/sisters/cousins/friends/frat-brothers/etc. have accounts too, all liked eventually to something the botter has access to. There are other ways also.
|
cardcounter0
banned
Reged: 05/10/04
Posts: 6047
|
|
Quote:
How would a bot owner get paid?
Usually by check.
|
BlueBear
veteran
Reged: 04/02/03
Posts: 1337
|
|
With all the information from extensive data mining, somebody who is an expert in statistical testing would be able to determine the likelihood they are bots of the same type.
|
Zimmer4141
enthusiast
Reged: 10/19/05
Posts: 341
Loc: Ann Arbor, MI
|
|
Quote:
With all the information from extensive data mining, somebody who is an expert in statistical testing would be able to determine the likelihood they are bots of the same type.
Well, I've taken an intro level Stats class and the likelyhood is very close to 1.
|
Victor
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 07/13/03
Posts: 11773
|
|
i told you guys long ago ftp had bots. good ole doug never responded to my allegations and most of you dismissed it as well.
situation is that bots are, and proly always have been, a part of online poker and there is little we can do about.
|
DMoogle
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 03/04/06
Posts: 2462
Loc: Oakton, VA, USA
|
|
Quote:
i told you guys long ago ftp had bots. good ole doug never responded to my allegations and most of you dismissed it as well.
situation is that bots are, and proly always have been, a part of online poker and there is little we can do about.
You didn't provide the same level of proof OP did. How is it something we can do nothing about? Pretty much nobody wants bots except bot owners (they may be exploitable, yes, but they're taking more money out of the game than you are out of them most likely), and poker sites want to keep good reputations. Therefore, it is in the interest of everyone to try to remove bots as efficiently as possible.
Gathering evidence that a player(s) might be a bot can be hard, but we all just need to keep an eye out.
|
Daddy Warbucks
1000+ Views
Reged: 10/16/06
Posts: 3968
Loc: Doin' numbers like Soduku
|
|
Quote:
situation is that bots are, and proly always have been, a part of online poker and there is little we can do about.
Wrong, we can keep floating them and raising their c-bets.
|
ktulu22
member
Reged: 01/27/07
Posts: 168
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
situation is that bots are, and proly always have been, a part of online poker and there is little we can do about.
Wrong, we can keep floating them and raising their c-bets.
That works only if you know you are playing a bot. The with bots isn't so much that they are going to be taking your money directly, it's that they are going to be taking the fish money that should be going to you.
|
roblin
journeyman
Reged: 05/19/06
Posts: 64
Loc: sweden
|
|
this thread is missing something... hmmm?!
THE SKY IS FALLING!
|
Grunch
Bounty Hunter
Reged: 08/25/04
Posts: 9623
|
|
Beating the bot isn't a problem, or shouldn't be for any of us. I've played against some of the mentioned accounts and found them to be highly exploitable.
The problem is what will happen when the FTP fish find out that FTP allows bots to play on thier site? They will go to Stars, that's what. And I will follow them...
|
viper930
banned
Reged: 12/18/05
Posts: 1554
|
|
All,
I have personally played with 3 of these guys a ton when I was 12 tabling 200NL FR on FTP a while ago and despite what the OP may treat as "conclusive evidence" these are not bots lol. As for 1forthethumb and mariojr, I've not only played with both of them but have talked to both of them. Unless they're some really elaborate bots capable of making competent table talk aside from playing winning deepstacked NLHE, then your grossly mistaken assumptions could have just cost a couple of ssnl grinders a month or more of frozen account troubles.
|
MicroBob
Johnny Chan Spotter
Reged: 09/19/03
Posts: 29344
Loc: The cat is back by popular dem...
|
|
go back and read again (yeah, I know it's really freaking long, but it's a good read).
Pretty obvious that the owner of the bots takes over play for them sometimes. Trebek addresses this angle extremely well.
|
jige
enthusiast
Reged: 09/09/05
Posts: 218
|
|
Quote:
All,
I have personally played with 3 of these guys a ton when I was 12 tabling 200NL FR on FTP a while ago and despite what the OP may treat as "conclusive evidence" these are not bots lol. As for 1forthethumb and mariojr, I've not only played with both of them but have talked to both of them. Unless they're some really elaborate bots capable of making competent table talk aside from playing winning deepstacked NLHE, then your grossly mistaken assumptions could have just cost a couple of ssnl grinders a month or more of frozen account troubles.
didnt you read the whole thread? OP says that sometimes the bot owner plays HIMSELF!
|
cardcounter0
banned
Reged: 05/10/04
Posts: 6047
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
All,
I have personally played with 3 of these guys a ton when I was 12 tabling 200NL FR on FTP a while ago and despite what the OP may treat as "conclusive evidence" these are not bots lol. As for 1forthethumb and mariojr, I've not only played with both of them but have talked to both of them. Unless they're some really elaborate bots capable of making competent table talk aside from playing winning deepstacked NLHE, then your grossly mistaken assumptions could have just cost a couple of ssnl grinders a month or more of frozen account troubles.
didnt you read the whole thread? OP says that sometimes the bot owner plays HIMSELF!
Ya, while the bot is playing, it would be impossible for the owner to sometimes type some stuff in the chat box. Case Closed.
|
raistlinx
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 01/15/06
Posts: 1747
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
With all the information from extensive data mining, somebody who is an expert in statistical testing would be able to determine the likelihood they are bots of the same type.
Well, I've taken an intro level Stats class and the likelyhood is very close to 1.
Math please.
|
viper930
banned
Reged: 12/18/05
Posts: 1554
|
|
1. The stats level out to extremely close numbers because those numbers are EXTREMELY typical of the tag setminers that infest the 200nl full ring games. The fact that the OP has stats filtered to an integer adds to this effect.
2. I did read the whole thread, and I have played with one or more of these players for extended periods on the same table. I'll try to find chat logs where more than 2 of them are talking but not sure how I'd go about doing that.
3. When there are tons of tables to play it's natural to avoid other regs. Anyone with half a brain does this. If you want me to find some HH's with more than one of these "bots" sitting together I'm sure I could manage to do so.
4. Is it not also a huge coincidence that the bot owner returns just as the OP has been utilizing the same tactics to win pots over and over? What does this sound like? Hmm, maybe a player who gives you credit for a few times and then gets sick of it and plays back at you?
I'm not sure if this is one gigantic leveling fest (which would be amazing) but this seems ridiculously silly. Whatever, put your tin hats back on I guess.
|
BlueBear
veteran
Reged: 04/02/03
Posts: 1337
|
|
viper 930:
Quote:
1. The stats level out to extremely close numbers because those numbers are EXTREMELY typical of the tag setminers that infest the 200nl full ring games. The fact that the OP has stats filtered to an integer adds to this effect.
Somebody needs to compare known set-mining 10/5s players to determine if they indeed do have similar stats in all areas (with a measure of statistical certainty).
|
KurtSF
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 07/06/06
Posts: 3983
|
|
Quote:
If you want me to find some HH's with more than one of these "bots" sitting together I'm sure I could manage to do so.
Post HHs please. Preferably with 2 of these players in a pot together.
|
Alobar
Carpal \'T-shirt
Reged: 11/05/03
Posts: 17702
Loc: spite shoving minraises
|
|
great post.
How long is it going to be tho before we the players finally realize that the sites simply DO NOT CARE about bots. Like you said, an intern with PT could easily find these things. We are to believe that a company making MILLIONS of dollars cant hire someone to simply look for bots?
They obviously dont want to get rid of the bots, they just want to appear to care to ease the concerns of the players, but keep right on getting the rake the bots generate. Hell in a perfect utopia for the sites, there would be nothing but 100% bots, they get their millions of dollars still in rake and they don't have to deal with all the BS that comes from real people.
sad thing is this post wont change anything, well get some candy ass PR response, and everyone will still go right on playing and still keep on telling anyone who complains about bots that they must suck at poker because playing against a bot is super easy, and that bots dont play NL, and blah blah blah. Lather rinse repeat. *shakes head*
|
BlueBear
veteran
Reged: 04/02/03
Posts: 1337
|
|
Quote:
3. When there are tons of tables to play it's natural to avoid other regs. Anyone with half a brain does this. If you want me to find some HH's with more than one of these "bots" sitting together I'm sure I could manage to do so.
I disagree. Someone playing tons of tables would not spend excessive energy to avoid a table with a strong regular (and instead just sit in a table with a fish). And winning players tend to find the loosest fishy tables anyway, so wouldn't it be natural for winning TAGs to flock to these tables? Again it should be very easy for a pokersite to detect if players are deliberately avoiding each other over an extended period of time. If 4 players were to sit in different tables mostly every time, this can be pretty strong evidence.
|
Kermit
veteran
Reged: 01/12/07
Posts: 1512
Loc: WIPE ME DOWN!!
|
|
Quote:
4. Is it not also a huge coincidence that the bot owner returns just as the OP has been utilizing the same tactics to win pots over and over? What does this sound like? Hmm, maybe a player who gives you credit for a few times and then gets sick of it and plays back at you?
the story is convincing, but i am not entirely sold either.
"i figure out how to exploit the NIT-BOT!! HUZZAH!! Do'h, the NIT-BOT took a stand with TPGK!! The ownder must have taken over!!! FOILED AGAIN!!""
kermit
|
kyleb
Gyroballer
Reged: 09/24/04
Posts: 10765
Loc: the death of baseball
|
|
Wow. Very interesting.
|
dp13368
old hand
Reged: 11/30/05
Posts: 1064
Loc: 3-bet.n
|
|
Quote:
great post.
How long is it going to be tho before we the players finally realize that the sites simply DO NOT CARE about bots. Like you said, an intern with PT could easily find these things. We are to believe that a company making MILLIONS of dollars cant hire someone to simply look for bots?
They obviously dont want to get rid of the bots, they just want to appear to care to ease the concerns of the players, but keep right on getting the rake the bots generate. Hell in a perfect utopia for the sites, there would be nothing but 100% bots, they get their millions of dollars still in rake and they don't have to deal with all the BS that comes from real people.
sad thing is this post wont change anything, well get some candy ass PR response, and everyone will still go right on playing and still keep on telling anyone who complains about bots that they must suck at poker because playing against a bot is super easy, and that bots dont play NL, and blah blah blah. Lather rinse repeat. *shakes head*
100% agree...
...waits for FTP's "I want to quiet them and hope they forget about it" response
|
DMoogle
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 03/04/06
Posts: 2462
Loc: Oakton, VA, USA
|
|
Quote:
1. The stats level out to extremely close numbers because those numbers are EXTREMELY typical of the tag setminers that infest the 200nl full ring games. The fact that the OP has stats filtered to an integer adds to this effect.
2. I did read the whole thread, and I have played with one or more of these players for extended periods on the same table. I'll try to find chat logs where more than 2 of them are talking but not sure how I'd go about doing that.
3. When there are tons of tables to play it's natural to avoid other regs. Anyone with half a brain does this. If you want me to find some HH's with more than one of these "bots" sitting together I'm sure I could manage to do so.
4. Is it not also a huge coincidence that the bot owner returns just as the OP has been utilizing the same tactics to win pots over and over? What does this sound like? Hmm, maybe a player who gives you credit for a few times and then gets sick of it and plays back at you?
1. These stats aren't "typical", they're IDENTICAL. The fact that these players all have the EXACT SAME stats, play nearly the SAME amount of hands, all play at the SAME time, and all avoid each other is extremely suspicious.
2. Irrelevant. It's already been shown that the owner(s) take over from time to time.
3. Natural to avoid regulars? Have you even played FTP's 1/2 NL tables? It's almost impossible to find a table with less than 3 regulars on it. In fact, any table WITH 3 regulars on it is considered a "good" table by most. I'll go out of my way to avoid a solid 25/18 well before I go out of my way to avoid a 14/7.
4. See #2.
|
orange
Knob
Reged: 09/19/04
Posts: 19438
Loc: University of NE Lincoln/Omaha
|
|
hmm interesting.
|
BlueBear
veteran
Reged: 04/02/03
Posts: 1337
|
|
Alobar:Quote:
They obviously dont want to get rid of the bots, they just want to appear to care to ease the concerns of the players, but keep right on getting the rake the bots generate.
It's not necessarily in the short-term interest of a site to remove the bots. 1) Extensive banning would frighten the casual player when the news spreads out. 2) Bots generate lots of rake. 3) A poker site has limited resources so investigating these claims are "wasteful" from the financial and labor point of view.
|
viper930
banned
Reged: 12/18/05
Posts: 1554
|
|
Upon further investigation, I retract a couple of my statements and agree with the OP a great deal more. I definitely still remember talking with 1forthethumb and mariojr on more than one occasion, but I just checked in my PT database and over 30,000 hands for each of these players, they have never recorded a single pot with each other.
Sorry for ripping on your claims without solid proof to the contrary OP.
I feel sick.
|
MyironThumb
addict
Reged: 01/01/07
Posts: 656
Loc: Dying in a grease fire
|
|
Quote:
over 30,000 hands for each of these players, they have never recorded a single pot with each other.
wow this is crazy. I only skimmed through OP's post, and i'll go back through it now. But have these players only been found at 1/2 full ring? I dont have a single hand on any of them at 1/2 6max FWIW
|
MicroBob
Johnny Chan Spotter
Reged: 09/19/03
Posts: 29344
Loc: The cat is back by popular dem...
|
|
post deleted because it's no longer relevant. Just saw that Viper already addressed this stuff.
Edited by MicroBob (05/09/07 12:52 PM)
|
4_2_it
Donktastic
Reged: 07/12/05
Posts: 18437
Loc: Trying to be the shepherd
|
|
Quote:
Upon further investigation, I retract a couple of my statements and agree with the OP a great deal more. I definitely still remember talking with 1forthethumb and mariojr on more than one occasion, but I just checked in my PT database and over 30,000 hands for each of these players, they have never recorded a single pot with each other.
Sorry for ripping on your claims without solid proof to the contrary OP.
I feel sick.
This might be the scariest post in this thread. Viper, thanks for taking the time to investigate this and for sharing your results.
|
BlueBear
veteran
Reged: 04/02/03
Posts: 1337
|
|
FTP deserves a mass boycott IMO. The OP has given them a long time to address this issue, but a satisfactory response is completely lacking.
|
Grunch
Bounty Hunter
Reged: 08/25/04
Posts: 9623
|
|
MB, I believe Viper retracted most or all of these arguments.
|
kyleb
Gyroballer
Reged: 09/24/04
Posts: 10765
Loc: the death of baseball
|
|
Bob,
He retracted.
|
PBJaxx
Strip Club Pro
Reged: 01/24/06
Posts: 2601
Loc: Ship Ship
|
|
I don't know what I think about this yet. Either way, I commend OP for his efforts.
I used to play a fair amount of 1/2 6max at FTP. I will check out my database when I get home. If they were full ring, I can guarantee you that I don't have a single HH with them in it.
|
Tinga
old hand
Reged: 11/25/04
Posts: 1034
Loc: minus the 81
|
|
good stuff SukitTrebek, thanks for the read.
|
pyedog
old hand
Reged: 02/07/05
Posts: 710
Loc: Waterloo, ON
|
|
Quote:
1. The stats level out to extremely close numbers because those numbers are EXTREMELY typical of the tag setminers that infest the 200nl full ring games. The fact that the OP has stats filtered to an integer adds to this effect.
2. I did read the whole thread, and I have played with one or more of these players for extended periods on the same table. I'll try to find chat logs where more than 2 of them are talking but not sure how I'd go about doing that.
3. When there are tons of tables to play it's natural to avoid other regs. Anyone with half a brain does this. If you want me to find some HH's with more than one of these "bots" sitting together I'm sure I could manage to do so.
4. Is it not also a huge coincidence that the bot owner returns just as the OP has been utilizing the same tactics to win pots over and over? What does this sound like? Hmm, maybe a player who gives you credit for a few times and then gets sick of it and plays back at you?
I'm not sure if this is one gigantic leveling fest (which would be amazing) but this seems ridiculously silly. Whatever, put your tin hats back on I guess.
I don't have any experience playing with these guys, while you do. However, just looking at all of the stats for those players they are almost identical. Even some of the more obscure ones which require a very large sample size are very close.
I am amazed that you think you are being levelled actually. What are the chances that there are four different players who have completely identical stats? Maybe if they're all playing out of some very elaborate textbook detailing a strategy.
Are you suggesting that they are 4 different real players? Or one player playing 4 different accounts at once? I feel like I'm the one being levelled. Those guys definitely seem like bots to me. The ridiculously long pause before EVERY routine decision isn't suspicious to you either?
|
BrandonJoseph47
journeyman
Reged: 05/09/07
Posts: 57
|
|
Consider this:A group of friends all play similar styles and play in a room together on the same IP address.That would explain why they never sit at the same tables,for fear of callusion flags.Isn't it possible for them to have a winning strategy,and help each other out? If there were bots on Full Tilt,they would remove them,case closed.I've personally seen them chat plenty,and have chatted with them myself.We should all be able to exploit ANY bot,and the fact that they keep winning makes me think that they aren't.
|
BlueBear
veteran
Reged: 04/02/03
Posts: 1337
|
|
MyironThumb: Quote:
But have these players only been found at 1/2 full ring? I dont have a single hand on any of them at 1/2 6max FWIW
The choice of a bot programmer to play 1/2 full ring is simple, I suspect it's easier to program a succesful set-mining nit bot, as opposed to a strong shorthanded LAG bot.
|
Alobar
Carpal \'T-shirt
Reged: 11/05/03
Posts: 17702
Loc: spite shoving minraises
|
|
Quote:
Alobar:Quote:
They obviously dont want to get rid of the bots, they just want to appear to care to ease the concerns of the players, but keep right on getting the rake the bots generate.
It's not necessarily in the short-term interest of a site to remove the bots. 1) Extensive banning would frighten the casual player when the news spreads out. 2) Bots generate lots of rake. 3) A poker site has limited resources so investigating these claims are "wasteful" from the financial and labor point of view.
yeah. Hell if I ran a site I wouldnt care either. Its butts in the seats and it's alot of money in my pocket. And it doesnt matter if I dont fix the problem because people are still going to play anyway. They'll bitch and moan about bots but they keep right on playing. Look at party poker, horrible customer service, keep raising rake, everyone hated them, yet we still kept right on lining up to play. We (the user base) have shown the sites time and time again that they can do whatever they want and we will still keep coming back for more. The bot issue is no different.
So its not like they are worried about long term consequences either, becuase they know there really arent any. All they have to do is appear to care and make it seem like its safe, and thats good enough for the typical player. Hell the typical player(fish) is soo clueless its funny. They play online poker even tho they "know" its 100% rigged, they havent got a clue about the reality of the situation, and they obviously don't care. and as long as they keep playing there so will we. And the sites know this. I bet they sit around and laugh at all our "im withdrawing all my money right now!" comments. Where are we going to go? Just to some other site that has bots, only they do a better job of making it seem like they care.
Edited by Alobar (05/09/07 12:56 PM)
|
Grunch
Bounty Hunter
Reged: 08/25/04
Posts: 9623
|
|
Quote:
FTP deserves a mass boycott IMO. The OP has given them a long time to address this issue, but a satisfactory response is completely lacking.
The first step should not be to boycott, it should be to demand an explanation.
I've already PMed FTPDoug. If the next time he logged in his mailbox had 100 PMs from 2p2ers demanding an official explanation, it would send a clear signal.
|
viper930
banned
Reged: 12/18/05
Posts: 1554
|
|
yeah, table dynamics etc play a lot less of a role in FR
|
MicroBob
Johnny Chan Spotter
Reged: 09/19/03
Posts: 29344
Loc: The cat is back by popular dem...
|
|
Everyone - also consider that this is JUST at NL100 because that is all trebek was looking at.
Anyone think this guy might have other bots doing the same thing at NL50, NL25 and perhaps even NL200 and NL400?
He doesn't want them to play against each other so he spreads out different bots to different stakes?
|
Don Key E37
old hand
Reged: 01/05/06
Posts: 724
Loc: bluff pushing into the nuts
|
|
Quote:
MyironThumb: Quote:
But have these players only been found at 1/2 full ring? I dont have a single hand on any of them at 1/2 6max FWIW
The choice of a bot programmer to play 1/2 full ring is simple, I suspect it's easier to program a succesful set-mining nit bot, as opposed to a strong shorthanded LAG bot.
Also play a lot of 6 max on Full Tilt and don't have any hands on any of these guys. Guess they don't play 6 max. Interesting thread though, hope they get shut down if its true.
|
William
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/24/03
Posts: 3850
Loc: Forever Doomswitched ...
|
|
3. When there are tons of tables to play it's natural to avoid other regs. Anyone with half a brain does this. If you want me to find some HH's with more than one of these "bots" sitting together I'm sure I could manage to do so.
If you can, please do. That would be a big argument against OP's post.
|
cardcounter0
banned
Reged: 05/10/04
Posts: 6047
|
|
Quote:
Consider this:A group of friends all play similar styles and play in a room together on the same IP address.That would explain why they never sit at the same tables,for fear of callusion flags.Isn't it possible for them to have a winning strategy,and help each other out? If there were bots on Full Tilt,they would remove them,case closed.I've personally seen them chat plenty,and have chatted with them myself.We should all be able to exploit ANY bot,and the fact that they keep winning makes me think that they aren't.
Not only are there no spaces after punctuation in your sentances,but there is very little logic,or thought in them either.In fact most of your points are quite laughable.These are more than just similar styles,they are indentical.And these pals in their little room never,ever, never play at the same tables.And they never take a shot at 6 max once in a while for kicks.Consider this:They are bots.
|
DING-DONG YO
Teh mfing DANG-dong
Reged: 02/23/06
Posts: 8122
Loc: ninja modng, bitches, u need 2...
|
|
Quote:
Consider this:A group of friends all play similar styles and play in a room together on the same IP address.That would explain why they never sit at the same tables,for fear of callusion flags.Isn't it possible for them to have a winning strategy,and help each other out? If there were bots on Full Tilt,they would remove them,case closed.I've personally seen them chat plenty,and have chatted with them myself.We should all be able to exploit ANY bot,and the fact that they keep winning makes me think that they aren't.
lol, are you the programmer?
|
Alobar
Carpal \'T-shirt
Reged: 11/05/03
Posts: 17702
Loc: spite shoving minraises
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Consider this:A group of friends all play similar styles and play in a room together on the same IP address.That would explain why they never sit at the same tables,for fear of callusion flags.Isn't it possible for them to have a winning strategy,and help each other out? If there were bots on Full Tilt,they would remove them,case closed.I've personally seen them chat plenty,and have chatted with them myself.We should all be able to exploit ANY bot,and the fact that they keep winning makes me think that they aren't.
lol, are you the programmer?
naw, im sure he regged on this day and made his first post in this thread to argue against it is entirely a coincidence
Edited by Alobar (05/09/07 01:02 PM)
|
BrandonJoseph47
journeyman
Reged: 05/09/07
Posts: 57
|
|
Laughable? No,this whole thread is laughable.THE SKY IS FALLING!! Trust me when I tell you that these are,in fact, NOT bots.Just a very determined group with a great strategy.
|
rgold79
member
Reged: 11/13/06
Posts: 187
|
|
Quote:
I just checked in my PT database and over 30,000 hands for each of these players, they have never recorded a single pot with each other.
Now that is definitely interesting. Do your numbers on each player match those of the OP?
|
cardcounter0
banned
Reged: 05/10/04
Posts: 6047
|
|
Quote:
Laughable? No,this whole thread is laughable.THE SKY IS FALLING!! Trust me when I tell you that these are,in fact, NOT bots.Just a very determined group with a great strategy.
Okay, we have found the bot owner.
|
pyedog
old hand
Reged: 02/07/05
Posts: 710
Loc: Waterloo, ON
|
|
I just noticed that Viper changed his mind. Anyways it bothers me when people just ignore these bot issues as something that could never happen. Bot infestations could easily ruin online poker for good. And with FTP showing they are too incompetent to do anything about it then it certainly doesn't look good for the smaller sites with even worse customer support.
Good work OP for doing all of this research. It's a bit frustrating to see that nothing will be done by FTP though. Well I will never play at that site, what a joke.
|
MicroBob
Johnny Chan Spotter
Reged: 09/19/03
Posts: 29344
Loc: The cat is back by popular dem...
|
|
I mostly ignored bot issues because I agreed with the popular sentiment at the time that it was just too complicated to program a bot to play well at an kind of meaningful stakes.
I wonder why this would be compared with ALL the calculations a chess-bot can perform or even how half-decently I assume some of the players are on Turbo-Holdem or one of the WSOP video-game things (where you play against Ferguson or Hachem or whoever).
But people around here convinced me otherwise that it just wasn't realistic at that time for a bot to do well.
Then I saw evidence to the contrary in various threads and used my incredible skills of reasoning and open-mindedness to look at the situation anew.
It's not that tough to have PREVIOUSLY thought bots weren't very realistic and then to open your eyes and realize you might have been wrong.
|
1p0kerboy
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/14/03
Posts: 6026
Loc: 492k
|
|
Quote:
Not only are there no spaces after punctuation in your sentances,but there is very little logic,or thought in them either.
Thread highjack to say this was awesome.
We now return to your regularly scheduled program.
|
1p0kerboy
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/14/03
Posts: 6026
Loc: 492k
|
|
Quote:
Upon further investigation, I retract a couple of my statements and agree with the OP a great deal more. I definitely still remember talking with 1forthethumb and mariojr on more than one occasion, but I just checked in my PT database and over 30,000 hands for each of these players, they have never recorded a single pot with each other.
Sorry for ripping on your claims without solid proof to the contrary OP.
I feel sick.
This scares me even more than the original post.
|
Knighthawk
journeyman
Reged: 04/12/07
Posts: 71
|
|
Quote:
Trust me when I tell you that these are,in fact, NOT bots.Just a very determined group with a great strategy.
Of course, the group all decides to start playing at the same time, leave at the same time. Does the group all go to the bathroom at the same time as well?
If it was a group of people, they would be coming and going at different times. If it's a group of people who work in shifts running all the accounts, then it's against FT's policy to have multiple accounts.
Either way, one cheater or many, not much difference, but FT doesn't care as long as the rake keeps coming in.
|
1p0kerboy
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/14/03
Posts: 6026
Loc: 492k
|
|
If it were a group of people, wouldn't they be sitting at THE SAME table and sharing their cards?
|
Lucky Clubs
newbie
Reged: 11/21/04
Posts: 40
|
|
It looks like three of them played in the same MTT on Full Tilt on Feb. 2 -- 1forthethumb, mariojr, and full_tilting. Obviously, whether they were ZeeJustin'ing is irrelevant to whether they ever sat together in cash games, but it makes me wonder if anyone would try to use MTT bots.
Edit: link http://www.officialpokerrankings.com/ful...37549B3F15.html
Edited by Lucky Clubs (05/09/07 01:15 PM)
|
DMoogle
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 03/04/06
Posts: 2462
Loc: Oakton, VA, USA
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Alobar:Quote:
They obviously dont want to get rid of the bots, they just want to appear to care to ease the concerns of the players, but keep right on getting the rake the bots generate.
It's not necessarily in the short-term interest of a site to remove the bots. 1) Extensive banning would frighten the casual player when the news spreads out. 2) Bots generate lots of rake. 3) A poker site has limited resources so investigating these claims are "wasteful" from the financial and labor point of view.
yeah. Hell if I ran a site I wouldnt care either. Its butts in the seats and it's alot of money in my pocket. And it doesnt matter if I dont fix the problem because people are still going to play anyway. They'll bitch and moan about bots but they keep right on playing. Look at party poker, horrible customer service, keep raising rake, everyone hated them, yet we still kept right on lining up to play. We (the user base) have shown the sites time and time again that they can do whatever they want and we will still keep coming back for more. The bot issue is no different.
So its not like they are worried about long term consequences either, becuase they know there really arent any. All they have to do is appear to care and make it seem like its safe, and thats good enough for the typical player. Hell the typical player(fish) is soo clueless its funny. They play online poker even tho they "know" its 100% rigged, they havent got a clue about the reality of the situation, and they obviously don't care. and as long as they keep playing there so will we. And the sites know this. I bet they sit around and laugh at all our "im withdrawing all my money right now!" comments. Where are we going to go? Just to some other site that has bots, only they do a better job of making it seem like they care.
This isn't completely true. Look at PokerRoom and the Prima network. Both have had some VERY big problems with customer service and people getting their money, and as a result of that there are very few people "in the know" of online poker (e.g. 2+2ers) that play there.
|
BrandonJoseph47
journeyman
Reged: 05/09/07
Posts: 57
|
|
Good luck at the tables,folks. Guess I won't post anymore, getting shredded for having a different opinion. That's the only way I can explain why FT let these guys back on, but here's to being close-minded...Cheers!
|
TonyDanza
addict
Reged: 08/10/05
Posts: 520
Loc: Cleaning House
|
|
Quote:
Consider this:A group of friends all play similar styles and play in a room together on the same IP address.That would explain why they never sit at the same tables,for fear of callusion flags.Isn't it possible for them to have a winning strategy,and help each other out? If there were bots on Full Tilt,they would remove them,case closed.I've personally seen them chat plenty,and have chatted with them myself.We should all be able to exploit ANY bot,and the fact that they keep winning makes me think that they aren't.
I think everyone has considered and dismissed this as the reasoning. When considering the stats, timing, time they play, etc. it does not equal 3 nerds in a room only playing when the others are playing and waiting 15 seconds on every decision.
|
Johnny King
stranger
Reged: 04/11/07
Posts: 23
|
|
[censored]!
|
pyedog
old hand
Reged: 02/07/05
Posts: 710
Loc: Waterloo, ON
|
|
Quote:
I mostly ignored bot issues because I agreed with the popular sentiment at the time that it was just too complicated to program a bot to play well at an kind of meaningful stakes.
I wonder why this would be compared with ALL the calculations a chess-bot can perform or even how half-decently I assume some of the players are on Turbo-Holdem or one of the WSOP video-game things (where you play against Ferguson or Hachem or whoever).
But people around here convinced me otherwise that it just wasn't realistic at that time for a bot to do well.
Then I saw evidence to the contrary in various threads and used my incredible skills of reasoning and open-mindedness to look at the situation anew.
It's not that tough to have PREVIOUSLY thought bots weren't very realistic and then to open your eyes and realize you might have been wrong.
Yeah Bob, I agree with you. Just to be clear, I was never too worried about NL bots either until this thread. But on the other hand I never agreed with the sentiment that it would be impossible to program a winning NL bot.
To be honest my style is fairly robotic most of the time and that seems to be good enough to have a solid winrate at 200NL 6max. I know that to succeed at higher levels against better players would require more complicated logic though.
|
MDMA
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 08/20/05
Posts: 2648
|
|
Seems like we do have the bot-programmer in the thread or someone affiliated with him, because only a retard would argue these players aren't bots. This whole gang of friends would checkraise ONLY against one player on the entire network, that's what you are saying? Also, given they have such an exact identitical nature every decisions should be made within an instant, so why would these individuals take 10-15 seconds for every decsions, that would just lose them money.
OP: Very, very good work here, one of the most interesting posts I've read on 2p2 in a long time. It's so obvious that FTP is trying to cover this up since the whole idea of "BOTS PLAYING ONLINE POKER; THEY ARE HERE NOW" would be such a blow to online poker that nobody knows what effect it could have. I'm just at a loss for words of how unprofessional FTP-support is.
|
William
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/24/03
Posts: 3850
Loc: Forever Doomswitched ...
|
|
Quote:
[censored]!
???... but the same to you, lol
|
KurtSF
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 07/06/06
Posts: 3983
|
|
Quote:
I know that to succeed at higher levels against better players would require more complicated logic though.
"Complicated logic" is the forte of a computer program.
|
kyleb
Gyroballer
Reged: 09/24/04
Posts: 10765
Loc: the death of baseball
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
I know that to succeed at higher levels against better players would require more complicated logic though.
"Complicated logic" is the forte of a computer program.
Actually, it isn't, but I think I know what you mean.
|
danzasmack
BBV goonie
Reged: 05/13/05
Posts: 7370
Loc: DYNAMO HARSHBART
|
|
Quote:
Good luck at the tables,folks. Guess I won't post anymore, getting shredded for having a different opinion. That's the only way I can explain why FT let these guys back on, but here's to being close-minded...Cheers!
WHAT THE [censored] GUYS YOU ALWAYS DO THIS
WHENEVER THE NEXT JOHNATHAN CHAN RUNS UP TO TWO PLUS TWO YOU SCARE HIM AWAY BY BEING RUDE
C;MON GUYS
|
limitninja
old hand
Reged: 11/12/06
Posts: 761
Loc: ninja land
|
|
people should withdraw their funds from fpt for now and link their emails to this thread, make sure they know why you are withdrawing.
|
danzasmack
BBV goonie
Reged: 05/13/05
Posts: 7370
Loc: DYNAMO HARSHBART
|
|
Quote:
people should withdraw their funds from fpt for now and link their emails to this thread, make sure they know why you are withdrawing.
this way 6 months from now when the bots have all the fish's $ we can get our checks
|
William
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/24/03
Posts: 3850
Loc: Forever Doomswitched ...
|
|
All 3 bots (1forhtethumb hasn't played for awhile) yesterday. None of them have played today (not yet at least)
|
selurah
old hand
Reged: 02/15/06
Posts: 1054
Loc: Indy
|
|
Quote:
Laughable? No,this whole thread is laughable.THE SKY IS FALLING!! Trust me when I tell you that these are,in fact, NOT bots.Just a very determined group with a great strategy.
LOLOLOL. Hurry back to Full Tilt and try to get your funds off there before all your bot accounts get frozen playa.
|
1p0kerboy
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/14/03
Posts: 6026
Loc: 492k
|
|
Quote:
All 3 bots (1forhtethumb hasn't played for awhile) yesterday. None of them have played today (not yet at least)
What time do they normally play?
|
drtofu66
newbie
Reged: 01/30/06
Posts: 30
|
|
"1forthethumb" and "mariojr"??? LOL
Sounds like the work of some CMU geeks (or some other Pittsburgh sports fan(s) ).
For those unfamiliar with Pittsburgh sports lore-- the Steelers had 4 Super Bowl victories/rings until 2006; enough for each finger of the hand but the thumb. From the 1980's to 2006 the Steeler fans' rallying cry was "One for the thumb".
As for "mariojr"-- back in the mid 1990's, someone noticed that 2nd banana Penguins hockey star Jaromir Jagr's first name was an anagram for "Mario Jr."-- as in Mario Lemieux. [Sorry if this is obvious to everyone-- I just figured that not everyone here follows Pittsburgh sports and some might not have caught the connection].
I'm no FBI profiler, but makes sense to me that this is the work of some college math/poker geeks at a techy school like CMU and the connection that two of the suspected bots' names have is highly suspicious.
|
BrandonJoseph47
journeyman
Reged: 05/09/07
Posts: 57
|
|
I just have a little faith in the system. If they froze their accounts,then let them back on, I assume that they aren't. You can have your conspiricy theories, I choose to have my own opinions. Believe me when I tell you I'm NOT a programmer, I wish I was that smart. Please don't shred someone for having a differing opinion,though, that is what forums are all about. Cheers..
|
cardman
old hand
Reged: 03/18/07
Posts: 999
|
|
Which sites are recommended to be the least likely to be bot infested?
Thanks for any info, guys.
|
1p0kerboy
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/14/03
Posts: 6026
Loc: 492k
|
|
Quote:
the connection that two of the suspected bots' names have is highly suspicious.
I was unaware of both, thanks for filling me in.
|
thirstyforwater
member
Reged: 02/01/07
Posts: 151
Loc: Madison, WI
|
|
I'm impressed with your detective skillz. well done
|
viper930
banned
Reged: 12/18/05
Posts: 1554
|
|
Quote:
I just have a little faith in the system. If they froze their accounts,then let them back on, I assume that they aren't. You can have your conspiricy theories, I choose to have my own opinions. Believe me when I tell you I'm NOT a programmer, I wish I was that smart. Please don't shred someone for having a differing opinion,though, that is what forums are all about. Cheers..
omgicantbelieveitablechattedw/u die botter!
|
William
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/24/03
Posts: 3850
Loc: Forever Doomswitched ...
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
All 3 bots (1forhtethumb hasn't played for awhile) yesterday. None of them have played today (not yet at least)
What time do they normally play?
After midnight (ET time) and after 4 PM are the most common hours (and they play for several hours in a row).
|
tautomer
enthusiast
Reged: 10/09/06
Posts: 356
|
|
Wow, I knew these guys (1forthethumb, full_tilting, and mariojr) always put in a ton of hands from my datamining but I guess I never noticed how similar all of their stats were. 14/7 is fairly common so I didn't think much of it. I just checked and can confirm they hadn't played each other as of mid March when I stopped collecting data on those stakes. Funny thing is, I wasn't even playing at Full Tilt at the time, just datamining in case I ever came back. But, my brother was playing so I sent him all the hand histories and told him to focus on exploiting these guys since they're on constantly. Last I heard, all those guys just quit playing one day, and my brother had moved up to 2/4 after kicking their ass. Oh and I have about 25,000 hands on each of them and Full_tilting is the only one ahead (3.00 BB/100). The other two are pretty much breakeven but down a little bit.
|
cardman
old hand
Reged: 03/18/07
Posts: 999
|
|
To the OP. One of the most interesting posts I've read. I was a bit shocked that I read the whole thing, considering how long it was.
|
happyhappyhappy
enthusiast
Reged: 12/20/06
Posts: 268
|
|
I assume someone from 2+2 is checking to see if brandonjoseph is posting from cmu/pittsburgh area?
|
Fat Nicky
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 10/20/04
Posts: 5017
Loc: StartWeight-260, Current-238
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
over 30,000 hands for each of these players, they have never recorded a single pot with each other.
wow this is crazy. I only skimmed through OP's post, and i'll go back through it now. But have these players only been found at 1/2 full ring? I dont have a single hand on any of them at 1/2 6max FWIW
me neither, and I data mine 16 tables 24/7.
|
KurtSF
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 07/06/06
Posts: 3983
|
|
Quote:
"1forthethumb" and "mariojr"??? LOL
Sounds like the work of some CMU geeks (or some other Pittsburgh sports fan(s) ).
For those unfamiliar with Pittsburgh sports lore-- the Steelers had 4 Super Bowl victories/rings until 2006; enough for each finger of the hand but the thumb. From the 1980's to 2006 the Steeler fans' rallying cry was "One for the thumb".
As for "mariojr"-- back in the mid 1990's, someone noticed that 2nd banana Penguins hockey star Jaromir Jagr's first name was an anagram for "Mario Jr."-- as in Mario Lemieux. [Sorry if this is obvious to everyone-- I just figured that not everyone here follows Pittsburgh sports and some might not have caught the connection].
I'm no FBI profiler, but makes sense to me that this is the work of some college math/poker geeks at a techy school like CMU and the connection that two of the suspected bots' names have is highly suspicious.
Another nice catch! One of the traits of bot-rings in the past was similar naming conventions.
These don't seem to be very sophisticated botters, and yet they're beating 200NL.
BrandonJoseph, a successful bot ring neds more than a good programmer or two, it also needs a SME (poker player) and a funder (who fronts the cash). The fact that you are not programmer doesn't mean you're not a botter. I'm not saying anything, other than the fact that you haven't denied it yet.
|
Wahoo73
addict
Reged: 03/09/06
Posts: 624
Loc: HOTLANTA
|
|
Quote:
Okay, we have found the bot owner.
Ya think?!?!?! He newly registers for 2+2 Forums today and first three posts he ever makes are in this thread.
Another example that criminals are narcissistic and egotistic deviants who believe they can't be caught no matter how much they flaunt their crimes.
I certainly hope that posters here who play at FTP (including me) will contact FTP about this, and I hope that the moderators of this forum will cooperate with any further FTP investigation by sharing information on the identity of BrandonJoseph47.
|
BrandonJoseph47
journeyman
Reged: 05/09/07
Posts: 57
|
|
Alright,you know what? F you guys! I'm just a guy who loves poker like the rest of you, and you're no different than the rest of these secret-handshaking forums that isolate someone with a different opinion, and trash them. And you complain about bots?? The irony is sickening. You robots all jump on the "it's cool to be on my fellow forum friends' side" bandwagon! Sorry for having a different point of view. Grow up.
|
Fat Nicky
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 10/20/04
Posts: 5017
Loc: StartWeight-260, Current-238
|
|
Quote:
"1forthethumb" and "mariojr"??? LOL
Sounds like the work of some CMU geeks (or some other Pittsburgh sports fan(s) ).
For those unfamiliar with Pittsburgh sports lore-- the Steelers had 4 Super Bowl victories/rings until 2006; enough for each finger of the hand but the thumb. From the 1980's to 2006 the Steeler fans' rallying cry was "One for the thumb".
As for "mariojr"-- back in the mid 1990's, someone noticed that 2nd banana Penguins hockey star Jaromir Jagr's first name was an anagram for "Mario Jr."-- as in Mario Lemieux. [Sorry if this is obvious to everyone-- I just figured that not everyone here follows Pittsburgh sports and some might not have caught the connection].
I'm no FBI profiler, but makes sense to me that this is the work of some college math/poker geeks at a techy school like CMU and the connection that two of the suspected bots' names have is highly suspicious.
wow...nice catch.
|
UATrewqaz
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 02/16/05
Posts: 5542
Loc: Atlanta
|
|
There is the very real possibility that the owner/operator of these bots might very well read 2+2 and this very thread, even if it isn't Brandon.
Books like "The Mathematics of Poker" (which I have) are like blueprints to building a good poker bot.
Poker, for all of the glamour and guts, is just a simple mathematical game. Bots who can play NL very well were/are inevitable. I think most people, including myself, just figured it would be many more years.
This will only get worse btw, AI and opponent modeling techniques will only get better, hand history databases will only grow larger, etc.
Sites will need to get proactive about stopping it, if they really want to.
|
BrandonJoseph47
journeyman
Reged: 05/09/07
Posts: 57
|
|
Investigate me all you want. I have one account on FullTilt with 260 dollars in it. I play one or two tables at .10/.25. Good luck,and like I said,isolate the free thinkers.
|
Coaster
stranger
Reged: 12/30/06
Posts: 18
|
|
Quote:
FTP deserves a mass boycott IMO
I play(ed) at FT every day. They've lost me because of their attitude toward this.
|
happyhappyhappy
enthusiast
Reged: 12/20/06
Posts: 268
|
|
Just Occam's Razor is all, Brandon.
|
drtofu66
newbie
Reged: 01/30/06
Posts: 30
|
|
Quote:
There is the very real possibility that the owner/operator of these bots might very well read 2+2 and this very thread
I'd be surprised if they didn't.
|
stompin
member
Reged: 07/22/06
Posts: 127
|
|
Quote:
Investigate me all you want. I have one account on FullTilt with 260 dollars in it. I play one or two tables at .10/.25. Good luck,and like I said,isolate the free thinkers.
um didnt you say in previous post that you played with the accounts in question and even chatted with them?
Was this at the .10/.25 tables?
|
William
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/24/03
Posts: 3850
Loc: Forever Doomswitched ...
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Investigate me all you want. I have one account on FullTilt with 260 dollars in it. I play one or two tables at .10/.25. Good luck,and like I said,isolate the free thinkers.
um didnt you say in previous post that you played with the accounts in question and even chatted with them?
Was this at the .10/.25 tables?
MWAHAHAHAHA..... NH
|
KurtSF
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 07/06/06
Posts: 3983
|
|