Terms & Conditions

Internet Magazine

Non–US new players
Get five 2+2 books


Order Books
Book Translations
Forum Login
 
 
Expand All   Collapse All

 Two Plus Two 
2+2 Magazine Forum
Special Sklansky Forum
2+2 Pokercast
About the Forums

 General Poker Discussion 
Beginners Questions
Books and Publications
Televised Poker
News, Views, and Gossip
Brick and Mortar
Home Poker
Beats, Brags, and Variance
Poker Theory
Poker Legislation

 Coaching/Training 
StoxPoker
DeucesCracked

 German Forums 
Poker Allgemein
Strategie: Holdem NL cash
Strategie: Sonstige
Internet/Online
BBV
Small Talk
German Poker News

 French Forums 
Forum francophone
Strategie
BBV (French)

 Limit Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes Limit
Medium Stakes Limit
Small Stakes Limit
Micro Stakes Limit
Mid-High Short-handed
Small Stakes Shorthanded
Limit––>NL

 PL/NL Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes
Medium Stakes
Small Stakes
Micro Stakes
Small-High Full Ring
Micro Full Ring

 Tournament Poker 
Small Stakes MTT
High Stakes MTT
MTT Community
STT Strategy
Tournament Circuit

 Other Poker 
Omaha/8
Omaha High
Stud
Heads Up Poker
Other Poker Games

 General Gambling 
Probability
Psychology
Sports Betting
Other Gambling Games
Entertainment Betting

 Internet Gambling 
Internet Gambling
Internet Bonuses
Affiliates/RakeBack
Software

 2+2 Communities 
Other Other Topics
The Lounge: Discussion+Review
El Diablo's General Discussion
BBV4Life

 Other Topics 
Golf
Sporting Events
Politics
Business, Finance, and Investing
Travel
Science, Math, and Philosophy
Health and Fitness
Student Life
Puzzles and Other Games
Video Games
Laughs or Links!
Computer Technical Help
Sponsored Support Forums
RakebackNetwork
RakeReduction.com
Other Links
Books
Authors
Abbreviations
Calendar
Order Books
Books by Others
Favorite Links
Feedback
Advertising Information
Home
Posting Hints
Privacy Notice
Forum Archives

The 2+2 Forums

Before using this Forum, please refer to the Terms and Conditions (Last modified: 2/26/2006)

Be sure to read the   Two Plus Two Internet Magazine

This is an archive. The main forums are here

These forums are read only.


 
UBB.threads™ Groupee, Inc.

PL/NL Texas Hold'em >> Micro Stakes

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >> (show all)
Pokey
Pretty much the best poster ever


Reged: 03/15/05
Posts: 3712
Loc: Using the whole Frist, doc?
uNL: you are weak-tight.
      #12528920 - 10/16/07 03:37 PM

A little over a year ago I tested SSNL and found out that they were weak-tight. Well, this month I tested uNL and found out that we're still weak-tight as a group.

What does weak-tight mean? In a nutshell, weak-tight means you have MUBS: (M)onsters (U)nder the (B)ed (S)yndrome. You give your opponents too much credit for hands and too much credit for hand-reading. I like to call it "Psychic Villain Syndrome," where you feel like your opponents can see into your soul. You know what? They really can't. They're just as lost as we are. Unfortunately, when we give them credit for being paranormally perceptive poker players we shoot ourselves in the foot, failing to make +EV moves because we fear that our plays will be obvious (no matter how far from the truth that might be).

Why do I accuse uNL of being weak-tight? Well, because I tricked you into telling me that you were. First, I gave you this thread where hero flops air:

----------

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.10/$0.25 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $28.60
BB: $22.55
UTG: $10.00
Hero (MP): $29.80
CO: $48.30
BTN: $10.35

Preflop: Hero is dealt J T (6 Players)
UTG folds, Hero raises to $1.00, 3 folds, BB calls $1.00

Flop: ($2.10) 9 8 5 (2 Players)
BB checks, Hero bets $2.00, BB calls $2.00

Turn: ($6.10) 2 (2 Players)
BB bets $5.00, Hero calls $5.00

River: ($16.10) 3 (2 Players)
BB checks, Hero bets $14.55....

----------

I then asked you how often villain calls the bluff. The results as of right now:

Less than 25% of the time: 6 (15% of responders)
Between 25% and 50% of the time: 11 (27.5% of responders)
Between 50% and 75% of the time: 18 (45% of responders)
More than 75% of the time: 5 (12.5% of responders)

After that thread died down, I had my sneaky moderator-accomplice make another post. It should look reasonably similar to you:

----------

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.10/$0.25 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $28.60
BB: $22.55
UTG: $10.00
Hero (MP): $29.80
CO: $48.30
BTN: $10.35

Preflop: Hero is dealt 7 6 (6 Players)
UTG folds, Hero raises to $1.00, 3 folds, BB calls $1.00

Flop: ($2.10) 9 8 5 (2 Players)
BB checks, Hero bets $2.00, BB calls $2.00

Turn: ($6.10) 2 (2 Players)
BB bets $5.00, Hero calls $5.00

River: ($16.10) 3 (2 Players)
BB checks, Hero bets $14.55....

----------

NOTE WELL: stacks are the same. The flop and flop action are identical. The turn and turn action are identical. The river and river action are identical. The ONLY DIFFERENCE is that instead of air we've got the immortal nuts. We then asked you how often THIS river bet gets called, and you told us:

Less than 25% of the time: 7 (29.2% of responders)
Between 25% and 50% of the time: 12 (50% of responders)
Between 50% and 75% of the time: 4 (16.7% of responders)
More than 75% of the time: 1 (4.2% of responders)

Bummer -- you're weak-tight. You've mistakenly assumed that an identical, unknown villain calls MUCH more often when we've got nothing than he would when we've got the nuts, even though every possible factor in the hand is otherwise identical. This makes no logical sense, it cannot be correct, but it's how we think as a group. That, my friends, is the very definition of weak-tight.

What are the consequences of being weak-tight? Well, the main consequence is that we make incorrect plays because we give our opponents too much credit. We bluff too little because we're just SURE that villain is calling, but in the same situation when we've got the nuts we bet small because we KNOW that villain won't call a big bet. I'm not saying that both of these statements are wrong, but at LEAST one of them MUST be. I honestly don't know where the truth lies. IF our villain will call our bluff-pushes too often for bluff-pushing to be profitable, then pushing with the nuts will be extremely +EV for us. On the other hand, IF our villain dumps most of his hands to a river push, then bluff-pushing will be extremely +EV for us. Only empirical evidence and reads will tell us which answer is correct for a particular villain, but believing that NEITHER pushing the nuts for value NOR pushing air as a bluff will be +EV cannot be correct -- if one doesn't work, the other will. My pure and uneducated guess is that at uNL, pushing for value is usually +EV and pushing as a bluff is usually -EV, but this will vary from villain to villain, and the formula will change as you move up in stakes.

How do we beat this weak-tight curse? Let's assume that we err on the side of overestimating our folding equity. If that's the case, then the next time you have the nuts on the river, ask yourself "if I had air, would pushing be +EV?" If your answer is no, then push. If your answer is yes then decide how large a bet you could make with air and still have it be +EV, reduce that amount by a couple BBs, and bet that much. This adjustment will reduce our predicted folding equity when we have the nuts. It might over-reduce it, but it's probably a move in the right direction.

Give it a try for a couple days and see how it works for you.

I don't point this out to insult you or try to make you feel stupid; rather, I point it out because it's an EXTRAORDINARILY common problem for poker players in general, at all stages of development. Let's try to get around our psychological stumbling blocks and start making rational decisions instead.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Milky
old hand


Reged: 07/07/04
Posts: 996
Re: uNL: you are weak-tight. [Re: Pokey]
      #12529009 - 10/16/07 03:43 PM

You sly devil you.

Thanks though, definitely food for thought.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CaptDrew
member


Reged: 01/15/06
Posts: 127
Re: uNL: you are weak-tight. [Re: Pokey]
      #12529055 - 10/16/07 03:46 PM

Second. Great post.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
GSykes
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 03/02/07
Posts: 3049
Loc: Blogging
Re: uNL: you are weak-tight. [Re: CaptDrew]
      #12529084 - 10/16/07 03:48 PM

Great post Pokey.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
thac
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 04/30/06
Posts: 9941
Loc: Go Buckeyes imo
Re: uNL: you are weak-tight. [Re: CaptDrew]
      #12529101 - 10/16/07 03:49 PM

lol you're so slick.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Gelford
Regular Joe


Reged: 11/15/05
Posts: 6392
Loc: Not mentioning the war
Re: uNL: you are weak-tight. [Re: thac]
      #12529159 - 10/16/07 03:52 PM

Meh .... we all love to act like kings in uNL

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
YanP
member


Reged: 07/16/07
Posts: 160
Re: uNL: you are weak-tight. [Re: Gelford]
      #12529230 - 10/16/07 03:57 PM

You tricked us, great points, when i'm not getting paid enough for big hands i bluff more and they keep on folding. and if they don't i blufff less.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Khumalo
journeyman


Reged: 02/16/07
Posts: 82
Re: uNL: you are weak-tight. [Re: Gelford]
      #12529237 - 10/16/07 03:57 PM

Pokey singlehandedly brings so much free value to these forums it's ridiculous!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
monkover
never gonna get a custom title


Reged: 09/07/06
Posts: 1634
Loc: Munich
Re: uNL: you are weak-tight. [Re: Khumalo]
      #12529255 - 10/16/07 03:59 PM

i think i selected the same % both times

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
takingcontrol
member


Reged: 03/01/07
Posts: 181
Re: uNL: you are weak-tight. [Re: thac]
      #12529256 - 10/16/07 03:59 PM

good post, lots of thought.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | >> (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 27 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ama0330, ajmargarine, EMc, orange, Matt Flynn, Sunny Mehta, Mike Haven 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 1112

Rate this topic

Jump to

contact us 2+2 Publishing

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Message Boards and Forums Directory

Pages provided by ConJelCo