Terms & Conditions

Internet Magazine

Non–US new players
Get five 2+2 books


Order Books
Book Translations
Forum Login
 
 
Expand All   Collapse All

 Two Plus Two 
2+2 Magazine Forum
Special Sklansky Forum
2+2 Pokercast
About the Forums

 General Poker Discussion 
Beginners Questions
Books and Publications
Televised Poker
News, Views, and Gossip
Brick and Mortar
Home Poker
Beats, Brags, and Variance
Poker Theory
Poker Legislation

 Coaching/Training 
StoxPoker
DeucesCracked

 German Forums 
Poker Allgemein
Strategie: Holdem NL cash
Strategie: Sonstige
Internet/Online
BBV
Small Talk
German Poker News

 French Forums 
Forum francophone
Strategie
BBV (French)

 Limit Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes Limit
Medium Stakes Limit
Small Stakes Limit
Micro Stakes Limit
Mid-High Short-handed
Small Stakes Shorthanded
Limit––>NL

 PL/NL Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes
Medium Stakes
Small Stakes
Micro Stakes
Small-High Full Ring
Micro Full Ring

 Tournament Poker 
Small Stakes MTT
High Stakes MTT
MTT Community
STT Strategy
Tournament Circuit

 Other Poker 
Omaha/8
Omaha High
Stud
Heads Up Poker
Other Poker Games

 General Gambling 
Probability
Psychology
Sports Betting
Other Gambling Games
Entertainment Betting

 Internet Gambling 
Internet Gambling
Internet Bonuses
Affiliates/RakeBack
Software

 2+2 Communities 
Other Other Topics
The Lounge: Discussion+Review
El Diablo's General Discussion
BBV4Life

 Other Topics 
Golf
Sporting Events
Politics
Business, Finance, and Investing
Travel
Science, Math, and Philosophy
Health and Fitness
Student Life
Puzzles and Other Games
Video Games
Laughs or Links!
Computer Technical Help
Sponsored Support Forums
RakebackNetwork
RakeReduction.com
Other Links
Books
Authors
Abbreviations
Calendar
Order Books
Books by Others
Favorite Links
Feedback
Advertising Information
Home
Posting Hints
Privacy Notice
Forum Archives

The 2+2 Forums

Before using this Forum, please refer to the Terms and Conditions (Last modified: 2/26/2006)

Be sure to read the   Two Plus Two Internet Magazine

This is an archive. The main forums are here

These forums are read only.


 
UBB.threads™ Groupee, Inc.

PL/NL Texas Hold'em >> Micro Stakes

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | >> (show all)
ama0330Moderator
more whining, less poker


Reged: 04/20/06
Posts: 5704
Loc: Crushing
PSA: One line answers
      #12133839 - 09/18/07 12:18 PM

Im going to start cracking down on one line answers. It is just not good enough to come into a thread and say something like "call" with no justification for why you think that is the best course of action. Obviously, sometimes the hand is very obvious (should I go all in with AA preflop??!! ololool) but most of the threads here require more anaylsis than that.

So in future if I catch you making some weak-sauce reply like "call>>>raise>>>>>fold" and you dont explain your reasoning I'll just delete your post. If you keep on doing it I'll just ban you for a couple of days so you can think about it. These forums exist so we can help one another with our games and one line posts do nothing but clutter threads and piss off moderators.

If you don't know the answer to the hand posted, then ask a question like "should we really be stacking off with AQ here when I think that a big part of his range is sets?" or alternatively, just read and learn.

THANKS

-ama


ps. call>>raise>>>>>fold obv


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
traz
Werewolf Super*


Reged: 10/21/05
Posts: 19775
Loc: Sleeping on stacks
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: ama0330]
      #12133921 - 09/18/07 12:24 PM

Am I allowed to respond to this thread? It's not locked :P

I think trying to garner more discussion is an admirable goal...but cracking down on one-liners may just encourage the lazy to post less. *Raises hand

Alot of hands really don't need a ton of explanation. If someone doesn't understand the one-liner than they should ask. In addition, sometimes I don't WANT to read alot of analysis. Sometimes I just want a one-line opinion from a bunch of posters.

I think, in general, this kind of rule isn't ideal. I do understand what you're trying to achieve and I trust you'll make sure not to drop the pwnstick unnecessarily. But that's just my opinion.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ama0330Moderator
more whining, less poker


Reged: 04/20/06
Posts: 5704
Loc: Crushing
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: traz]
      #12133990 - 09/18/07 12:30 PM

Im talking about really blatant lack of effort, maybe I should have said one WORD answers instead of one line answers. Like you go into a thread and it says "fold flop". What the hell does that achieve? Nothing. Sure, some hands dont need a great deal of explanation, so make it a brief explanation. Like -

BAD: "Fold flop"

GOOD: "Fold flop. You're usually behind to a set here and preflop action makes it hard for him to have AA/KK"

That extra sentence makes all the difference IMO.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Nogatsira
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 03/06/07
Posts: 1636
Loc: Belgium
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: traz]
      #12134008 - 09/18/07 12:31 PM

ama>>rest ldo

No but for real, it's about time someone steps up!
I notice myself posting some very short replies sometimes and it really blows because honestly nobody learns anything from it.
There is, or there should be, an explanation for every move you do while you're playing, so you might aswell type the reasoning with it to help others or to find leaks in your own thoughts.

A+ thread!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
0524432
addict


Reged: 09/16/06
Posts: 461
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: ama0330]
      #12134059 - 09/18/07 12:34 PM

Good point ama, I will make a point to keep myself in line as well.

However, I'd like you to address the idea of having the outcome of the hand in white txt at the end of the HH.( Example: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...=1#Post12128482 ) I think this is a great way of still allowing the users to read through the lines, while still seeing some real results and how the villain played what etc...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
JimboNYY24
member


Reged: 08/24/06
Posts: 172
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Nogatsira]
      #12134078 - 09/18/07 12:35 PM

good idea

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Nogatsira
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 03/06/07
Posts: 1636
Loc: Belgium
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: 0524432]
      #12134094 - 09/18/07 12:37 PM

Quote:

Good point ama, I will make a point to keep myself in line as well.

However, I'd like you to address the idea of having the outcome of the hand in white txt at the end of the HH.( Example: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...=1#Post12128482 ) I think this is a great way of still allowing the users to read through the lines, while still seeing some real results and how the villain played what etc...




You shouldnt even care what the results are. In this particular situation villain might have the nuts, in another he might have air.
You want to find a sollution to play a hand that would make most profit in the long run.
You might think a call is good in a hand and the results show you that it was a good call but actually it might have been a bad play (if you understand what i mean)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hennnerz
veteran


Reged: 12/02/06
Posts: 1208
Loc: UWE, Bristol
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: JimboNYY24]
      #12134175 - 09/18/07 12:43 PM

Quote:

good idea




2 day ban plz.

EDIT: Because he didn't explain his response.

Edited by hennnerz (09/18/07 12:44 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
z28dreams
Box Wine Connoisseur


Reged: 09/09/05
Posts: 2791
Loc: Donating at the tables
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: hennnerz]
      #12134213 - 09/18/07 12:46 PM

Seriously....

I think people should have to post their BB/100 winrate next to their advice as well.

SOOOOOOO much bad advice on here it's not even funny.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Nogatsira
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 03/06/07
Posts: 1636
Loc: Belgium
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: z28dreams]
      #12134245 - 09/18/07 12:49 PM

Quote:

Seriously....

I think people should have to post their BB/100 winrate next to their advice as well.

SOOOOOOO much bad advice on here it's not even funny.




Thats why the reasoning behind their post would be good. If they say "call" then nobody knows why.
If they say "call because . . . ." then other people will see aswell if its a stupid answer or not or atleast discuss it.
There's no reason to post BB/100 because you would need to post a samplesize, the limits, amount of tables, ... and all other stuff aswell and it would still be bs. Everyone inhere is a uNL player


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hennnerz
veteran


Reged: 12/02/06
Posts: 1208
Loc: UWE, Bristol
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Nogatsira]
      #12134316 - 09/18/07 12:55 PM

This is redic. Try reading other NL forums and implementing this across them all, theres no way you could/would, so why here?

Its so so standard to just give the move you feel is correct, then if asked to people can expand their answers.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
danny8
old hand


Reged: 06/12/06
Posts: 888
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: hennnerz]
      #12134580 - 09/18/07 01:14 PM

i takes litterally no more effort to post a tiny reasoning instead of just 1 word. you obv dont need to right a small book every time you reply, but a simple '...coz i doubt he calls with anyhting you beat' etc, makes things much clearer. like nogatsira said a little explanation helps determine if the advice is good or not, its helps evertyone, especially the poster since he could have a completely wrong and backwards reason to their action.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
zooot
member


Reged: 06/01/07
Posts: 111
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: ama0330]
      #12134600 - 09/18/07 01:16 PM

IMO - The point of posting hands in the first place is to uncover and understand the different elements you should be considering when deciding how to play a hand. You will be in many similar situations in the future, however, very rarely will you encounter the exact situation again. So, simply knowing the correct decision for a past situation w/out understanding the thought-process behind it leaves you unprepared for dealing w/ similar situations in the future. Clearly one should think on one's own about why a respondent might answer "call" instead of "raise". But presumably we've gone through this at the table when the hand was initially played, and yet still chose a different action for one reason or another.

edit: posted from perspective of one who receives MUCH more advice than he gives. obv ty's to all those who take time to give advice to the uNL'ers regardless of how many words you use.

Edited by zooot (09/18/07 01:46 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
traz
Werewolf Super*


Reged: 10/21/05
Posts: 19775
Loc: Sleeping on stacks
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: zooot]
      #12134660 - 09/18/07 01:21 PM

I just think that SO many threads end up boiling down to "should I call because I'm ahead, or fold because I'm behind."

In these situations, saying anything except your preferred action ends up being very redundant. I guess I'm in the minority, but there are loads of situations where I think this is a little silly. It just seems like it's super nitty for mods to regulate this kind of thing.

Asking posters to explain there actions more would be fine. Saying "if you don't I will take mod action" is just not my cup of tea.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
0524432
addict


Reged: 09/16/06
Posts: 461
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Nogatsira]
      #12134761 - 09/18/07 01:30 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Good point ama, I will make a point to keep myself in line as well.

However, I'd like you to address the idea of having the outcome of the hand in white txt at the end of the HH.( Example: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...=1#Post12128482 ) I think this is a great way of still allowing the users to read through the lines, while still seeing some real results and how the villain played what etc...




You shouldnt even care what the results are. In this particular situation villain might have the nuts, in another he might have air.
You want to find a sollution to play a hand that would make most profit in the long run.
You might think a call is good in a hand and the results show you that it was a good call but actually it might have been a bad play (if you understand what i mean)




This is the last I'll be commenting on this subject in this thread, as I think it is off topic. However, I don't how to further explain to you that while I DO very much appreciate and thrive off the learning technique regarding thinking through HHs without the results, I'm not proposing that be changed in any way. Contrary to your comment about how I should not care about the results, while I understand your point (which is a point we've all heard a million times), when it comes down to it, I DO care....sometimes. Not every post does it matter, but enough times, thinking through the HH and the line both the hero and villain without the results, and THEN being able to consult the outcome afterwards, IMO is VERY valuable.

Many times I have narrowed the range down to only a few hands even possibly a single hand which I'm always sure of, it is an undeniable learning tool to think through the hand (without the results) and then consult them if you choose.

IMO not only will it be rewarding to realize you're starting to understand some of the std lines these players are taking in certain situations, but also when you are wrong, be able to decide when/why you're thought process went wrong.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jk1986
old hand


Reged: 08/27/06
Posts: 775
Loc: London
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: traz]
      #12134780 - 09/18/07 01:32 PM

Quote:

I just think that SO many threads end up boiling down to "should I call because I'm ahead, or fold because I'm behind."

In these situations, saying anything except your preferred action ends up being very redundant. I guess I'm in the minority, but there are loads of situations where I think this is a little silly. It just seems like it's super nitty for mods to regulate this kind of thing.

Asking posters to explain there actions more would be fine. Saying "if you don't I will take mod action" is just not my cup of tea.




QFT


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Nogatsira
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 03/06/07
Posts: 1636
Loc: Belgium
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: 0524432]
      #12134797 - 09/18/07 01:33 PM

I agree with you on that point 0524432 but I think when you add it in the opening post that alot of people will base their comments on the results.
What would be better is to post the result after the discussion is over, and then you can see if you went wrong somewhere yourself.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Keitan
enthusiast


Reged: 07/26/07
Posts: 220
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Nogatsira]
      #12135070 - 09/18/07 01:55 PM

Posters asking for feedback can decide for themselves how much credit to give to comments based on numerous factors. If they choose to read a comment "Fold flop" as the one and only choice and apply it to every single similar situation then they are dumb, that's all. I don't see why these one liners would bother mods - players don't need to be spoon fed analysis and can judge a comment's merit on their own. I know I'm new, just my opinion - if this becomes the rule, wtvr, np.

Edited by Keitan (09/18/07 02:03 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Nogatsira
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 03/06/07
Posts: 1636
Loc: Belgium
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Keitan]
      #12135084 - 09/18/07 01:56 PM

What about some kind of system, lets name it the "EV-counter" where you can give people +1 or -1 depending on their posts.
Ive seen some forums where they give 'karma-points' like that. I don't think it would be a bad idea here.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jk1986
old hand


Reged: 08/27/06
Posts: 775
Loc: London
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Nogatsira]
      #12135101 - 09/18/07 01:58 PM

Quote:

What about some kind of system, lets name it the "EV-counter" where you can give people +1 or -1 depending on their posts.
Ive seen some forums where they give 'karma-points' like that. I don't think it would be a bad idea here.




That's kinda a HUGE change, although I know they were discussing changing how titles and stuff works recently somewhere, might be worth mentioning the idea there.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hennnerz
veteran


Reged: 12/02/06
Posts: 1208
Loc: UWE, Bristol
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Nogatsira]
      #12135104 - 09/18/07 01:58 PM

Quote:

What about some kind of system, lets name it the "EV-counter" where you can give people +1 or -1 depending on their posts.
Ive seen some forums where they give 'karma-points' like that. I don't think it would be a bad idea here.




Nice. +1 EV for you.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
traz
Werewolf Super*


Reged: 10/21/05
Posts: 19775
Loc: Sleeping on stacks
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: hennnerz]
      #12135149 - 09/18/07 02:02 PM

It was discussed as a replacement for the * system in OOT, the idea was ultimately disgarded

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
zooot
member


Reged: 06/01/07
Posts: 111
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Nogatsira]
      #12135177 - 09/18/07 02:04 PM

after thinking about it - i actually don't mind having to ask for more info from someone who says "shove wtf". rather get that, and possibly a follow up than poor advice or nothing at all.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bozzer
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 05/29/06
Posts: 2140
Loc: in with the 2p2 lingo
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: zooot]
      #12135240 - 09/18/07 02:07 PM

you better make sure you moderate this properly. a lot of (my) one line answers come from the flow of the thread.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ajmargarineModerator
old school


Reged: 06/11/05
Posts: 12050
Loc: one decision
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Nogatsira]
      #12135306 - 09/18/07 02:12 PM

Quote:

What about some kind of system, lets name it the "EV-counter" where you can give people +1 or -1 depending on their posts.
Ive seen some forums where they give 'karma-points' like that. I don't think it would be a bad idea here.




Not available with this software. Might be available when they change over to a new system, which I think is coming up soon.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Richard Tanner
[censored]


Reged: 08/19/04
Posts: 3187
Loc: Now this is a movement I can s...
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Nogatsira]
      #12135408 - 09/18/07 02:19 PM

Quote:

I agree with you on that point 0524432 but I think when you add it in the opening post that alot of people will base their comments on the results.
What would be better is to post the result after the discussion is over, and then you can see if you went wrong somewhere yourself.




Eh, when I'm looking at a hand, I read the HH and then decide, or at least try to decide, what I would do, and, because it's often two different things , try to decide the best play.

Then I like to see the results because each hand is a little like a murder mystery and I like to see who-done-it.

Cody


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
0524432
addict


Reged: 09/16/06
Posts: 461
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Nogatsira]
      #12135465 - 09/18/07 02:23 PM

Quote:

I agree with you on that point 0524432 but I think when you add it in the opening post that alot of people will base their comments on the results.
What would be better is to post the result after the discussion is over, and then you can see if you went wrong somewhere yourself.




true, that would make for an awfully bland 2p2 with a sudden surge of uNL genius'


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ama0330Moderator
more whining, less poker


Reged: 04/20/06
Posts: 5704
Loc: Crushing
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: bozzer]
      #12135833 - 09/18/07 02:50 PM

All,

I am glad that my post has generated this discussion because I think that it is important.

Basically, I view the forum as a learning tool where we sit down and discuss things that none of us really know the true best answer to. Whats more, we often find that there are NO right answers to our questions, just good logic. So in this way, someone saying "call" may just be acting on feel, or impulse, or whatever.

But think about it this way. If you were discussing a hand with a friend, face to face, and he says "so what should I do on this flop?" and you say "call" - he's not just going to say "oh...ok" he's going to say "why?" Thats the reason we post hands, because of that "why". If I was sure every action I made was correct just because I felt it, why bother posting it here? I don't want you to tell me what YOU "feel" in one word about the hand, I want you to explain why you would take a certain action, as opposed to another one.

Thats why we have this forum, to expose ourselves to different thought processes and approaches so that we can modify and maybe improve our own. "Call" tells me NOTHING. All that tells me is that you want to call. Why? Just because you felt like it? Because you don't know what to do otherwise? Because you are a calling station? Thats what fish do. They take actions because they have no idea what to do otherwise, and they can't back their plays up with any kind of logic.

Have you ever asked a fish why they made a boneheaded play? I have. I bet pot on three streets into a guy who backdoored a flush, at the Gutshot in London. He called with no pair no draw on the flop. When I asked him why he called on the flop, he shrugged. "I dunno". Thats a classic fish right there - no idea why he called. When you give a one line answer, thats how it comes across - it makes it look like you are shrugging and saying you dont know.

This is 2p2. Every single one of you is here, in this forum, because you want to improve your game. That is simply not going to happen unless you put some minimal effort into the replies you give on this board. I'm not talking about writing essays, I'm talking about answering the "because". Justify your actions. Some of you may think I am over-reacting, but whats the point of having a board with the reputation of being the foremost authority on poker instruction if you cant learn anything from its members?

Quote:

you better make sure you moderate this properly. a lot of (my) one line answers come from the flow of the thread.




Clearly, this is fine, and I think we are all able to distinguish between what constitutes outright laziness, and what is part of a colloquial discussion of a hand. I'm not a grammar nazi, I'm here to supervise the quality of the responses to threads and keep the noise to a minimum.

You all know what I'm talking about.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EMcModerator
The People's Mod


Reged: 02/24/05
Posts: 7663
Loc: LETS GO YANKEES!!
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: 0524432]
      #12135869 - 09/18/07 02:52 PM

a. The results dont matter, dont post them
b. Ama is right
c. Very few have a sample size that makes BB/100 relevant, and on top of that, when we start talking about win rates dick swinging ensues
d. I usually will only post a one word answer if it has already been explained or if I feel it has value (i.e. I can give you a fish, or teach you to fish)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
munkey
A model citizen


Reged: 05/25/06
Posts: 1340
Loc: stackasaurus
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: EMc]
      #12136171 - 09/18/07 03:12 PM

I think it's goot that ama raised this , people who make longer replies have to think more and put the why process in to words which is often hard -for me anyway.

Some things to do

  • Give a range for villan given the action
  • If it's an AI flop/ situation combo draw vs made hand e.t.c on the flop pokerstove & EV calc FTW
  • Give an alternative to the main line others suggest
  • If it's a flop/turn situation, outline future potential/likely street action e.g. what if a scare card hits.


All these things help your own game and generate better discussion.

Though I think requoting what someone earlier has said should still be allowed as if a few say the same and really is only 1 line [to take] or it's ultra standard like the ones I often I post when running bad and unsure

I think as long as people aren't chronic 1 liners and elaborate in some of their posts then its o.k.

Back to teh footie now.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
thac
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 04/30/06
Posts: 9941
Loc: Go Buckeyes imo
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: munkey]
      #12136231 - 09/18/07 03:16 PM

Wow.



(JK obv.)

Good point ama, we're here to learn, not get a decision in a vacuum with no reasoning.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Willem
enthusiast


Reged: 04/26/06
Posts: 230
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: munkey]
      #12136280 - 09/18/07 03:19 PM

Fwiw I'm happier with a one-word answer from a respected poster so I know it's probably right, than I am with a 300 word reply written by a noob (like myself).

Of course not all threads can be answered in a single-word reply, but when a good poster does reply with one word this is usually not the case.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Student Caine
old hand


Reged: 04/10/04
Posts: 791
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: munkey]
      #12136505 - 09/18/07 03:32 PM

wtf...so "r4r!" is no longer an appropriate response?

Seriously though, I think the more explanation that can be provided the better. I do not know that it should come to banning someone, but then again I would really be surprised if it ever did come to that (surely a "Hey dude, please explain your answers" would be enough to prod us all along).

Edited by Student Caine (09/18/07 03:34 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Nemesis69
old hand


Reged: 04/17/07
Posts: 1129
Loc: SPARTAAAA!
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: munkey]
      #12136514 - 09/18/07 03:33 PM

I like it. I was discussing this problem with Nogatsira in class today. Good job

Maybe IF people want a one-word reply they should add a poll

Edited by Nemesis69 (09/18/07 03:34 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kurto
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 09/01/04
Posts: 6777
Loc: in your heart
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: EMc]
      #12136756 - 09/18/07 03:48 PM

Quote:

a. The results dont matter, dont post them
b. Ama is right
c. Very few have a sample size that makes BB/100 relevant, and on top of that, when we start talking about win rates dick swinging ensues
d. I usually will only post a one word answer if it has already been explained or if I feel it has value (i.e. I can give you a fish, or teach you to fish)




(1) I agree that brief answers are appropriate if its already been explained... in which case, its merely reinforcing that others agree with the logic. Though perhaps in those cases someone should quote the person who they're agreeing with...
(2) I am one of the many who WANT to know the results. I think its both interesting (like reading a murder mystery and then never learning who did it) and educational. One of the ways you learn how other players play is by watching. A fish might donk bet with one kind of hand and another wouldn't. Seeing how different types of players played different hands is helpful. When results are NOT what we expect, it reminds us to look at our opponents differently. "Oh... that kind of player WOULD push with this kind of hand on the turn. I should remember that although I wouldn't do that, clearly this type of player would. "


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
0524432
addict


Reged: 09/16/06
Posts: 461
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: EMc]
      #12136870 - 09/18/07 03:54 PM

Quote:

a. The results dont matter, dont post them
b. Ama is right
c. Very few have a sample size that makes BB/100 relevant, and on top of that, when we start talking about win rates dick swinging ensues
d. I usually will only post a one word answer if it has already been explained or if I feel it has value (i.e. I can give you a fish, or teach you to fish)





the winner/loser doesn't matter, but IMO seeing both hands to get real experience from reading down lines is crucial

From what it sounds like to me, the "results don't matter" has become the answer for the tough situation that including the two hands involved would cause regarding the useless bland responses that would come from poster reading the result of the HH before posting.

My ? is....can you allow the results to be shown once a poster enters a response?

Edited by 0524432 (09/18/07 03:58 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
0524432
addict


Reged: 09/16/06
Posts: 461
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: kurto]
      #12136954 - 09/18/07 03:59 PM

Quote:

Quote:

a. The results dont matter, dont post them
b. Ama is right
c. Very few have a sample size that makes BB/100 relevant, and on top of that, when we start talking about win rates dick swinging ensues
d. I usually will only post a one word answer if it has already been explained or if I feel it has value (i.e. I can give you a fish, or teach you to fish)




(1) I agree that brief answers are appropriate if its already been explained... in which case, its merely reinforcing that others agree with the logic. Though perhaps in those cases someone should quote the person who they're agreeing with...
(2) I am one of the many who WANT to know the results. I think its both interesting (like reading a murder mystery and then never learning who did it) and educational. One of the ways you learn how other players play is by watching. A fish might donk bet with one kind of hand and another wouldn't. Seeing how different types of players played different hands is helpful. When results are NOT what we expect, it reminds us to look at our opponents differently. "Oh... that kind of player WOULD push with this kind of hand on the turn. I should remember that although I wouldn't do that, clearly this type of player would. "




Exactly, but you have to understand why they're doing it, to preserve 2p2


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
clowntable
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 06/20/06
Posts: 7076
Loc: Lille, France
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: ama0330]
      #12137193 - 09/18/07 04:18 PM

Quote:

Im going to start cracking down on one line answers. It is just not good enough to come into a thread and say something like "call" with no justification for why you think that is the best course of action. Obviously, sometimes the hand is very obvious (should I go all in with AA preflop??!! ololool) but most of the threads here require more anaylsis than that.

So in future if I catch you making some weak-sauce reply like "call>>>raise>>>>>fold" and you dont explain your reasoning I'll just delete your post. If you keep on doing it I'll just ban you for a couple of days so you can think about it. These forums exist so we can help one another with our games and one line posts do nothing but clutter threads and piss off moderators.

If you don't know the answer to the hand posted, then ask a question like "should we really be stacking off with AQ here when I think that a big part of his range is sets?" or alternatively, just read and learn.

THANKS

-ama


ps. call>>raise>>>>>fold obv



Please tell me that you came up with this after reading my selfquote in your what? thread. Because that was the idea behind it :P
I like it, swing the banhammer

p.s.: Perosnally I don't even want much of a "do this because of that" kind of answer. I'd like an answer along the lines of "these are the things that should go through your head and lead to the decision"
Thought process + explaination of whot one would do based on the thought process >Thought process > recommendation only


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
mookboi
old hand


Reged: 11/06/05
Posts: 814
Loc: Fitty NL
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: clowntable]
      #12137715 - 09/18/07 04:52 PM

FWIW, I think Sightless gives the best hit-the-nail-on-the-head type of advice, and I don't think I've ever seen him write more than one line.

I guess I see the reasoning behind the rule though.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Jamougha
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 10/02/05
Posts: 9246
Loc: Learning to read the board
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: mookboi]
      #12137754 - 09/18/07 04:55 PM

[censored] you

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EMcModerator
The People's Mod


Reged: 02/24/05
Posts: 7663
Loc: LETS GO YANKEES!!
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Jamougha]
      #12139452 - 09/18/07 06:41 PM

Jam,

I never see you post here but in SSNL you give bomb answers.

Also too, ama,

raise>>>>>>>fold>>call LDO


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
jk1986
old hand


Reged: 08/27/06
Posts: 775
Loc: London
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: EMc]
      #12139486 - 09/18/07 06:43 PM

Quote:

Jam,

I never see you post here but in SSNL you give bomb answers.





I've been a fan of what I've seen in uNL, def post more down here in the dungeon Jamouga


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Guruman
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 01/24/05
Posts: 3704
Loc: still a NL fish - so lay off!
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Jamougha]
      #12139502 - 09/18/07 06:45 PM

I think AMA's totally right here. I'd love to post in this forum more, but the propensity of duders to just say "fold" and have that be it is remarkably counterproductive.

If its been covered already, don't post a one word repeat.
If the play is ridiculously stupid, don't post or else explain specifically why its stupid so that the op can see the error of his ways.


This forum suffers from avalanches of redundant or unenlightening one-word answers. I always make a note to specifically ask for no alternate line suggestions without reasoning because well, I get that a lot and it sucks.

I'll be posting more hands in the future. When I post I give all of my reads/thoughts in the hopes of getting back relevant analysis.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who's seen an issue.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Frosteater
member


Reged: 11/19/06
Posts: 130
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Guruman]
      #12139761 - 09/18/07 07:04 PM

Another point to consider for those who aren't too comfortable with that idea is that more elaborate answers might not only be beneficial to the original poster but also to the one who answers.

Whenever I feel like I can contribute to a hand history I try to be as elaborate as possible. If my advice is right, the original poster knows exactly why to play that way in that situation and might not only pick up the correct play but also the mindset behind it and be able to refine his playing style in case situations like the one he asked about might come up again. If my advice is wrong, on the other hand, more experienced posters have an easy time picking up the flaws in my explanation. Again, the original poster can see exactly why my suggested play is suboptimal and so can I. On top of that my answers can take up to 30 minutes to write and I reread them myself multiple times. This seems like overkill, but I think it's actually really beneficial to analyzing your play. Often I don't have the time to thoroughly analyze my own play at the tables, but with a posted hand I'm presented with a specific situation and allowed to take all the time I need to completely take it apart and focus on every single aspect. Of course this is a lot more work then "raise flop, shove turn", but at least for me it's a great way of improving by analyzing situations. Like a session review without being emotionally attached in a "I can't believe that fish called and hit his 2 outer" way.

Actually, the longer my posts are the more I feel like it was more help to me than to the original poster.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hennnerz
veteran


Reged: 12/02/06
Posts: 1208
Loc: UWE, Bristol
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Frosteater]
      #12139919 - 09/18/07 07:15 PM

Most of the time I think..."tl;dr, uNL poster anyway, won't be anything profound."

Gross generalization I know.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
C4LL4W4Y
veteran


Reged: 02/15/07
Posts: 1415
Loc: NJ
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Frosteater]
      #12139958 - 09/18/07 07:18 PM

i like this idea, save for the fact it's at the discretion of a mod. but i like you ama (and your strat), and trust you won't abuse your powers.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
inverted
enthusiast


Reged: 03/09/07
Posts: 273
Loc: New Zealand
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: C4LL4W4Y]
      #12140535 - 09/18/07 08:02 PM

my only worry is that possibly this will lead to less posts, even if someone says fold it's atleast adding to the tide so to speak

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Antinome
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 02/28/06
Posts: 1640
Loc: Boston
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: inverted]
      #12140688 - 09/18/07 08:15 PM

Sometimes I go to look at a thread and see eight nits telling OP to fold a hand that obviously has enough equity to continue ... I don't always have time to go nuts working out combinatorics or equity, but I don't want to let it stand either. Putting a one liner in there at least pushes the thread back up to the top where hopefully someone sane with some time on their hands will see it and correct it before everyone walks away ignorant.

If we do get caught one-lining, do we get a little extra credit for being right? j/k


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
scallop
old hand


Reged: 10/18/06
Posts: 861
Loc: YouTube: Vader Sessions.
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Antinome]
      #12140723 - 09/18/07 08:17 PM

nice rule

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
scallop
old hand


Reged: 10/18/06
Posts: 861
Loc: YouTube: Vader Sessions.
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: scallop]
      #12140733 - 09/18/07 08:18 PM

seriously that was a joke - I cant be bothered getting banned. I'm a victim for this wuth some hands and I'll endevour to improve this in the future.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Frosteater
member


Reged: 11/19/06
Posts: 130
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Antinome]
      #12140819 - 09/18/07 08:24 PM

Quote:

Most of the time I think..."tl;dr, uNL poster anyway, won't be anything profound."

Gross generalization I know.




I don't quite get this, hennnerz, if it's for the "uNL poster anyway" point, wouldn't the post be pretty much a waste of resources, anyway, no matter how long?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
hennnerz
veteran


Reged: 12/02/06
Posts: 1208
Loc: UWE, Bristol
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Frosteater]
      #12140879 - 09/18/07 08:28 PM

Standard uNL poster struggles to beat uNL and has leaks. I generally will take more notice of the posters I respect more due to a history of good posts.

Again generalization I know. But you see my point?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Frosteater
member


Reged: 11/19/06
Posts: 130
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: hennnerz]
      #12141113 - 09/18/07 08:47 PM

I do, in fact I think I totally understand you on this one. And on top of that it would probably be a torture to dig through 15 three-paragraph-posts that are just as uninspired as the one-liners they tried to avoid.

But if you mention a history of good posts, I'd assume such would consist mainly of more than one-liners. I just think it's easier for uNL to bring up more posters that can be respected, if the less experienced players elaborate their thought process a bit, so the experienced posters can elaborate why that thought process is nonsense.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kaz2107
Jumpman HOLLA!


Reged: 07/26/05
Posts: 2943
Loc: Hating CO pro sports atm
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Frosteater]
      #12143628 - 09/19/07 12:05 AM

nothing gets me more pissed then when i post a hand and have like 3 poeple with less then 200 posts post in the thread first with quick one liners. ERRRRR

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
sightless
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 03/18/05
Posts: 9009
Loc: Brooklyn
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: scallop]
      #12143647 - 09/19/07 12:06 AM

wow thats a shame; really really dislike this idea
how can 1 word replies ever be a bad thing.
at the very least it fules discussion

Edited by sightless (09/19/07 12:09 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
EMcModerator
The People's Mod


Reged: 02/24/05
Posts: 7663
Loc: LETS GO YANKEES!!
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: sightless]
      #12143749 - 09/19/07 12:14 AM

sightless,

you are under the "my posts rock enough already so i can post as i please cause EMc said so" grandfather clause


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Gelford
Regular Joe


Reged: 11/15/05
Posts: 6392
Loc: Not mentioning the war
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: EMc]
      #12144430 - 09/19/07 01:14 AM

Grunch

Fold pf


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
kaz2107
Jumpman HOLLA!


Reged: 07/26/05
Posts: 2943
Loc: Hating CO pro sports atm
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: EMc]
      #12148717 - 09/19/07 11:40 AM

Quote:

sightless,

you are under the "my posts rock enough already so i can post as i please cause EMc said so" grandfather clause


who else has this clause so i dont berate them in my threads for being retards and go on monkey tilt.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
sightless
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 03/18/05
Posts: 9009
Loc: Brooklyn
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: EMc]
      #12148728 - 09/19/07 11:41 AM

Quote:

sightless,

you are under the "my posts rock enough already so i can post as i please cause EMc said so" grandfather clause




lol thanks


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
fees
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 02/19/07
Posts: 4162
Loc: Whats my motivation? LOLOLOLOL...
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: sightless]
      #12148795 - 09/19/07 11:47 AM

good op

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Disconnected
old hand


Reged: 03/29/05
Posts: 1051
Loc: A peaceful place, or so it loo...
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: fees]
      #12149681 - 09/19/07 12:53 PM

Good idea to do this. Why we should do something is more important than what we should actually do, IMO. You can explain why to do something in only a few words sometimes (and the best posters do this well).

A nice side effect of putting in the thought process behind decisions is that the bad advice people complain about will not stick around that much. There may be a fair amount of poor advice posted, but as a group, we're not shy to challenge it.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ICMoney
uNL Librarian


Reged: 09/27/05
Posts: 1720
Loc: Watching Vids > Playing
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: Disconnected]
      #12377334 - 10/05/07 04:44 PM

Someone better warn Pokey.

We may lose him forever. (We all know how few words he likes to use.)

JK.
Love you P.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pokey
Pretty much the best poster ever


Reged: 03/15/05
Posts: 3712
Loc: Using the whole Frist, doc?
Re: PSA: One line answers [Re: ICMoney]
      #12379485 - 10/05/07 07:50 PM

Quote:

Someone better warn Pokey.

We may lose him forever. (We all know how few words he likes to use.)

JK.
Love you P.




Standard.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | >> (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 18 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  ama0330, ajmargarine, EMc, orange, Matt Flynn, Sunny Mehta, Mike Haven 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 3111

Rate this topic

Jump to

contact us 2+2 Publishing

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Message Boards and Forums Directory

Pages provided by ConJelCo