RedCrossGirl
stranger
Reged: 08/06/07
Posts: 7
|
|
Im confused, someone please help. Thanks
Chelle
|
PLO8FaceKilla
addict
Reged: 05/21/07
Posts: 560
|
|
no its not.
tell all your friends that too please.
|
RedCrossGirl
stranger
Reged: 08/06/07
Posts: 7
|
|
ok thx
|
Skallagrim
old hand
Reged: 11/29/06
Posts: 1071
Loc: The Live Free or Die State
|
|
It depends.
On the place from which you log in, and the specific laws of that place.
There is a search function for these forums, you know.
Skallagrim
|
The Bandit Fish
enthusiast
Reged: 12/23/06
Posts: 260
Loc: Eastern NC/Rochester, NY
|
|
In some states it is. WA and LA come to mind, but there is no federal law against playing poker online.
|
oldbookguy
old hand
Reged: 05/30/07
Posts: 820
Loc: wvgeneralstore.com
|
|
Yes, some individual states have laws concerning players, others against sites.
Sadly for some, hopefully for many the UIGEA restrictions on Poker / Online Gaming OTHER than sports betting will be limited to these states.
There are 11 that are currently listed as one way or the other, in some cases both.
Compatible Poker lists them as follows:
Illinois Indiana Louisiana - felony to play online poker for real money in the US Michigan Nevada New Jersey New York Oregon South Dakota Washington - felony to play online poker for real money in the US Wisconsin
obg
|
tangled
enthusiast
Reged: 02/10/06
Posts: 318
|
|
One thing is clear though --- nobody in any state has ever been arrested, or threatened with arrest, for playing online.
|
Bill Haywood
old hand
Reged: 04/13/03
Posts: 746
Loc: Arkansas
|
|
Besides the states that specifically ban it, it is the position of the U.S. Attorney General that federal law also prohibits it. But he is basing that on the 1963 Wire Act, which courts have repeatedly ruled applies only to TAKING sports bets. So he could arrest anyone, then TRY to make it stick.
Quote:
nobody in any state has ever been arrested, or threatened with arrest, for playing online.
I have a vague memory of a player arrested by some state, but for the practical purposes of the herd, that's correct.
|
Malrick
stranger
Reged: 07/16/07
Posts: 3
Loc: Austin, TX
|
|
Quote:
Yes, some individual states have laws concerning players, others against sites.
Sadly for some, hopefully for many the UIGEA restrictions on Poker / Online Gaming OTHER than sports betting will be limited to these states.
There are 11 that are currently listed as one way or the other, in some cases both.
Compatible Poker lists them as follows:
Illinois Indiana Louisiana - felony to play online poker for real money in the US Michigan Nevada New Jersey New York Oregon South Dakota Washington - felony to play online poker for real money in the US Wisconsin
obg
Don't all those states have legal casinos? Did they just outlaw it so that people couldn't play from home?
|
jkpoker
addict
Reged: 01/28/07
Posts: 550
Loc: Grinding
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Yes, some individual states have laws concerning players, others against sites.
Sadly for some, hopefully for many the UIGEA restrictions on Poker / Online Gaming OTHER than sports betting will be limited to these states.
There are 11 that are currently listed as one way or the other, in some cases both.
Compatible Poker lists them as follows:
Illinois Indiana Louisiana - felony to play online poker for real money in the US Michigan Nevada New Jersey New York Oregon South Dakota Washington - felony to play online poker for real money in the US Wisconsin
obg
Don't all those states have legal casinos? Did they just outlaw it so that people couldn't play from home?
This is just primas list of banned states
Most all of them allow live play most have laws banning online play.
I know Idaho spacifically states that poker online or live is illegal and its not there.
|
The Bandit Fish
enthusiast
Reged: 12/23/06
Posts: 260
Loc: Eastern NC/Rochester, NY
|
|
Quote:
Besides the states that specifically ban it, it is the position of the U.S. Attorney General that federal law also prohibits it. But he is basing that on the 1963 Wire Act, which courts have repeatedly ruled applies only to TAKING sports bets. So he could arrest anyone, then TRY to make it stick.
I have a feeling this would get laughed out of court. Isn't the Wire Act pretty specific about sports betting? Or am I wrong here?
Besides the AG has other things to worry about right now. Like not being thrown in jail for perjury.
|
oldbookguy
old hand
Reged: 05/30/07
Posts: 820
Loc: wvgeneralstore.com
|
|
This deals with Internet wagering of all kinds. This list is not just from campatible poker, it is also the same one used by 'skill' gaming sites such as worldwinner, AOl, MSN and YAHOO! games (all 3 affiliates of worldwinner or one skill site or another) along with the other skill gaming sites.
This is where we have a best shot for poker in the short run, then attack the 11 states while defending the 39 other states.
The Poker sites using this list are simply making the claim and stating the position that Poker is a skill game the same as the other card 'skill' games offered; Solitaire, hearts, spades, free cell and many others.
Try going to MSN games or Yahoo games and taking a look see at the variety of card games there for CASH / SKILL money wagering.
MSN: http://zone.msn.com/en/root/gamebrowser.htm?playmode=4&genre=0
YAHOO: http://games.yahoo.com/skill-games
World Winner: http://www.worldwinner.com/
obg
|
rminusq
enthusiast
Reged: 07/31/07
Posts: 202
Loc: Maryland
|
|
Not quite. The list used by WorldWinner is significantly different: Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Montana, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont.
|
Skallagrim
old hand
Reged: 11/29/06
Posts: 1071
Loc: The Live Free or Die State
|
|
And all of these lists are interpretations, not clearly defined settled state law. In some states, these laws would only apply to tournaments, not cash games. And most are subject to being unconstitutional under the commerce clause.
The fact that these skill sites exist is an important point and quite useful in the argument over online poker, just dont rely on their lists as to how these state laws would govern poker if it is (rightfully) recognized as a skill game.
|
oldbookguy
old hand
Reged: 05/30/07
Posts: 820
Loc: wvgeneralstore.com
|
|
Excellent point, they are useful for our argument.
As to the 'list' per say, I play some at a poker club and this is the ALLOW list and it INCLUDES Louisiana which has a law against internet gambling as I understand it but does not include Washington State. Yes, these 'lists' are opinions and do vary.
Alaska Arizona California Colorado Connecticut D.C. Delaware Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Massachusetts Mississippi Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Oklahoma Ohio Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
obg
|
Legislurker
old hand
Reged: 05/05/07
Posts: 728
|
|
I think the sad thing is we may need the Regs to be HORRID before we have good enough standing and demonstrable harm to actually get in court. Then I think we can muster enough plaintiffs to start a case in every federal circuit. I think its kind of ironic that the UIGEA is such horrible law its hard to challenge yet since its not been promulgated, but is scary enough everyone wet their corporate panties.
|
JPFisher55
old hand
Reged: 06/29/06
Posts: 963
|
|
Quote:
I think the sad thing is we may need the Regs to be HORRID before we have good enough standing and demonstrable harm to actually get in court. Then I think we can muster enough plaintiffs to start a case in every federal circuit. I think its kind of ironic that the UIGEA is such horrible law its hard to challenge yet since its not been promulgated, but is scary enough everyone wet their corporate panties.
This is why I am not holding my breath for seeing regs anytime soon and why if the regs do come out, then they will be general in nature and not add anything specific to the UIGEA.
|
Carlson411
enthusiast
Reged: 08/29/06
Posts: 323
|
|
Quote:
Besides the states that specifically ban it, it is the position of the U.S. Attorney General that federal law also prohibits it. But he is basing that on the 1963 Wire Act, which courts have repeatedly ruled applies only to TAKING sports bets. So he could arrest anyone, then TRY to make it stick.
Quote:
nobody in any state has ever been arrested, or threatened with arrest, for playing online.
I have a vague memory of a player arrested by some state, but for the practical purposes of the herd, that's correct.
UTAH is putting the pressure on players in that state. Super Conservative state.
|