Woolygimp
**
Reged: 03/14/05
Posts: 3042
Loc: Dodging bans since '03.
|
|
Post deleted by Buzz
Edited by Buzz (11/25/07 07:19 AM)
|
wazz
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/06
Posts: 2560
Loc: London
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
You're having the most semantically useless argument I've ever heard.
I think you have some tense problems in you're sentence structure.
I will hope that this mistake had been intentional.
|
Troll_Inc
abcdefgh nopqrstu
Reged: 03/18/06
Posts: 2566
Loc: FGHIJKLM STUVWXYZ
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You're having the most semantically useless argument I've ever heard.
I think you have some tense problems in you're sentence structure.
I will hope that this mistake had been intentional.
Son, put down that spliff!
|
Troll_Inc
abcdefgh nopqrstu
Reged: 03/18/06
Posts: 2566
Loc: FGHIJKLM STUVWXYZ
|
|
Quote:
Aces were 48% to win three way, I was 33%, and K266 had less than 15% equity. HU KKQJ is 74% against K662. Drop his K and make it a Q, and it becomes 80/20 which is the equivalent to some of the best holdem PF edges.
You are more likely to have 22xx and flop quads on a A22 vs someone holding AAxx than your scenario.
|
plzbenice
addict
Reged: 01/17/07
Posts: 648
|
|
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV As Ks Ad 2h 279386 55.88 220565 44.11 49 0.01 0.559 Qc Jc Th 9h 220565 44.11 279386 55.88 49 0.01 0.441
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV As Ks Ad 2h 260228 52.05 239772 47.95 0 0.00 0.520 8c 7c 6h 5h 239772 47.95 260228 52.05 0 0.00 0.480
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV As Ks Ad 2h 112810 22.56 288264 57.65 98926 19.79 0.325 Ac 9d Ah 3h 56062 11.21 345012 69.00 98926 19.79 0.211 7c 6c 5h 4h 232202 46.44 267798 53.56 0 0.00 0.464
As Ks Ad 2h 101945 20.39 306117 61.22 91938 18.39 0.296 3s Ac 9d Ah 33566 6.71 374496 74.90 91938 18.39 0.159 7c 6c 8h 5h 272551 54.51 227449 45.49 0 0.00 0.545
As Ks Ad 2h 165772 33.15 334228 66.85 0 0.00 0.332 9s Qd 9d Qh 146862 29.37 353138 70.63 0 0.00 0.294 7c 6c 8h 5h 187366 37.47 312634 62.53 0 0.00 0.375
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV As Qs Ad 2h 198245 39.65 301755 60.35 0 0.00 0.396 9s Kd 2d Kh 109916 21.98 390084 78.02 0 0.00 0.220 8c 6c 5d Jh 191839 38.37 308161 61.63 0 0.00 0.384
|
plzbenice
addict
Reged: 01/17/07
Posts: 648
|
|
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV As Qs Ad 2h 185055 37.01 314945 62.99 0 0.00 0.370 9s Kd 2d Kh 106596 21.32 393404 78.68 0 0.00 0.213 8c 6c 5d 7h 208349 41.67 291651 58.33 0 0.00 0.417
Omaha Hi: 500000 sampled boards cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV As Qs Ad 2h 196490 39.30 303510 60.70 0 0.00 0.393 9s Kd 2d Kh 115459 23.09 384541 76.91 0 0.00 0.231 6s 8c 5d 7h 188051 37.61 311949 62.39 0 0.00 0.376
|
vetiver
enthusiast
Reged: 07/05/07
Posts: 212
|
|
On a sidenote, is Slotboom's Omaha book worth $17?
|
Woolygimp
**
Reged: 03/14/05
Posts: 3042
Loc: Dodging bans since '03.
|
|
[deleted], it's funny that you took your time to post all that and clearly all your examples are weighted to prove your point.
[deleted], are you f***ing kidding. [deleted]
My conclusion is [deleted as berating and insulting to another poster]
Edited by Buzz (11/25/07 07:16 AM)
|
ChuckyB
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 04/11/05
Posts: 2470
Loc: Fox Soccer Report
|
|
Quote:
On a sidenote, is Slotboom's Omaha book worth $17?
100% yes. It's not all about short-stacking. And it's got valuable information I haven't seen anywhere else.
|
Woolygimp
**
Reged: 03/14/05
Posts: 3042
Loc: Dodging bans since '03.
|
|
Like how to put idiot posters like [deleted] on ignore.
Edited by Buzz (11/25/07 07:06 AM)
|