View Full Version : PP 5/10 calling raise from SB w/ 99
Woolygimp
01-07-2006, 02:19 AM
I opted to c/r the flop for information. If i was 3-bet I could conclude I was up against a higher pocket pair (occasionally a ten) and could fold the turn while at the same time extracting value from the c-betting overcards.
Is there a more optimal line? Also could I ever fold 99 in there PF? (Probaly wouldn't be optimal considering I'd have position throughout the rest of the hand)
Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx (http://www.zerodivide.cx/converter)
Preflop: Hero is SB with 9/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 9/images/graemlins/diamond.gif.
<font color="#CC3333">UTG raises</font>, <font color="#666666">6 folds</font>, Hero calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>.
Flop: (5 SB) 3/images/graemlins/spade.gif, T/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 6/images/graemlins/club.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, UTG calls.
Turn: (4.50 BB) 6/images/graemlins/heart.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG folds.
Final Pot: 5.50 BB
lightw1thoutheat
01-07-2006, 02:28 AM
i think i play it the same.
nh
Nick C
01-07-2006, 02:29 AM
Since I'm playing, I would probably 3-bet preflop to encourage BB to get out.
But your call worked out. And the flop checkraise looks good.
You'll run into some 5/10 players who will 3-bet you on the flop with overcards, so I don't think you can safely assume you're up against an overpair if you face continued aggression, exactly.
UTG wasn't an aggressive overcard player -- in this hand, in any case -- but you are going to encounter more of them at 5/10 than at, say, 3/6. So it's something to be aware of and watch out for, I guess I'm saying.
When you're up against an opponent and feel you can't get reliable information with the line you took in this hand, then check-calling the flop and turn starts looking attractive.
Woolygimp
01-07-2006, 02:34 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Since I'm playing, I would probably 3-bet preflop to encourage BB to get out.
But your call worked out. And the flop checkraise looks good.
You'll run into some 5/10 players who will 3-bet you on the flop with overcards, so I don't think you can safely assume you're up against an overpair if you face continued aggression, exactly.
UTG wasn't an aggressive overcard player -- in this hand, in any case -- but you are going to encounter more of them at 5/10 than at, say, 3/6. So it's something to be aware of and watch out for, I guess I'm saying.
When you're up against an opponent and feel you can't get reliable information with the line you took in this hand, then check-calling the flop and turn starts looking attractive.
[/ QUOTE ]
How effective would lead/3-betting and slowing down if capped be?
Nick C
01-07-2006, 02:47 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Since I'm playing, I would probably 3-bet preflop to encourage BB to get out.
But your call worked out. And the flop checkraise looks good.
You'll run into some 5/10 players who will 3-bet you on the flop with overcards, so I don't think you can safely assume you're up against an overpair if you face continued aggression, exactly.
UTG wasn't an aggressive overcard player -- in this hand, in any case -- but you are going to encounter more of them at 5/10 than at, say, 3/6. So it's something to be aware of and watch out for, I guess I'm saying.
When you're up against an opponent and feel you can't get reliable information with the line you took in this hand, then check-calling the flop and turn starts looking attractive.
[/ QUOTE ]
How effective would lead/3-betting and slowing down if capped be?
[/ QUOTE ]
I would lead if I 3-bet preflop (well, unless Villain capped). And I think it would look like I was in trouble if I got raised, but I would probably call-down anyway, without a read (unless an ace appeared on the turn or river).
Anyway, I prefer your flop checkraise to a lead/3-bet. Partly this is because it seems unnecessary, in a way, to lead a street that Villain is going to auto-bet. Still, a bet/3-bet line does have its place, versus someone who is going to auto-raise (and they do exist). However, a bet/3-bet line followed by a calldown in the face of further aggression seems like a lot of action to be putting in, versus an UTG raise.
Hell, I don't know. I'm still trying to figure out 5/10 aggression myself. (And I find that when I don't know where I'm at or how to find out, I do more checking and calling than I used to.)
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.