PDA

View Full Version : NL10 tptk+nfd: stack off or fold?


youngmachetes
11-30-2007, 01:52 AM
Poker Stars, $0.05/$0.10 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com (http://www.leggopoker.com) - Hand History Converter (http://www.leggopoker.com/hh)

UTG: $24.25
MP: $14.85
CO: $0.25
Hero (BTN): $9.85
SB: $11.75
BB: $18.10

Pre-Flop: A/images/graemlins/spade.gif Q/images/graemlins/spade.gif dealt to Hero (BTN)
UTG folds, MP calls $0.10, <font color="red">CO raises to $0.25 and is All-In</font>, Hero calls $0.25, SB calls $0.20, BB folds, MP calls $0.15

Flop: ($1.10) 7/images/graemlins/spade.gif J/images/graemlins/spade.gif Q/images/graemlins/diamond.gif (4 Players - 1 is All-In)
SB checks, <font color="red">MP bets $0.20</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $1.10</font>, <font color="red">SB raises to $4.20</font>

Results: $3.50 Pot ($3.50 Rake)


villain is unknown, but i haven't seen him get out of line. this is still early in a session, though.

Berky
11-30-2007, 01:57 AM
100bbs stack this of every time.

Hebel
11-30-2007, 01:58 AM
if you are having doubts about shoving here stop playing poker

mocky
11-30-2007, 02:10 AM
Raise it up preflop to 1.25

mdwexford
11-30-2007, 02:13 AM
3 bet pre, ship flop every time, its not close.

youngmachetes
11-30-2007, 02:15 AM
i think 3-betting is awful in this spot. well not awful, but i prefer flatting.

mocky
11-30-2007, 02:17 AM
[ QUOTE ]
i think 3-betting is awful in this spot. well not awful, but i prefer flatting.

[/ QUOTE ]


Why do you think a 3 bet here is awful?

youngmachetes
11-30-2007, 02:25 AM
why is a 3-bet here good? so you can iso the 2.5bbs that shorty shoved for? i'd rather let the other fish in the pot instead of blowing them off worse.


edited to add: i stacked off here, but was thinking afterward it may have been spew because his range is weighted toward huge made hands here, right?

i would like to hear more responses in regards to preflop, also.

mocky
11-30-2007, 02:38 AM
If you raised pre would you have been stacked? You probably would have scooped a small pot instead you lost your stack when you gave the SB a nice price to complete.

youngmachetes
11-30-2007, 02:42 AM
yes, but there is significantly less potential to make money when i 3-bet. you're right though, i would've scoop those 5bbs. hopefully this post doesn't sound condescending, as you may very well be correct.

mocky
11-30-2007, 02:48 AM
No its not condescing each to their own bro!
Why is their less of a chance of you making money by 3 betting though?
You have a hand and position get some money in that pot, if no one calls so what you take down a small pot and move on.

youngmachetes
11-30-2007, 03:03 AM
i didn't really feel like i'd get action from worse, but i prob. should have 3bet considering results, lol (sarcasm). i have yet to hear anyone on my side of the argument, so i guess 3betting is the play.

ckj
11-30-2007, 03:39 AM
First of all, AQ is a hand that plays poorly multiway. You're definitely flat call with 55 or T9s because these play best multiway. While the AQ is suited, it's still better to take the value now, by getting some money in preflop.

existential_dred
11-30-2007, 03:48 AM
AQ suited?...i at least make it 5-6 bbs pre-flop especially when the earlier raiser was all in for 2.5 bbs......ignore him...you still have a limper ahead of him and position on the entire table...build the pot and hope to catch a piece pre-flop...at the worse, you win 5 bbs..