PDA

View Full Version : too fancy for nl10?


hoyasaxa
10-19-2007, 02:59 PM
villains first hand at table
Full Tilt Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (6 handed) Hand History converter (http://www.learnhowtoplaypokerfree.com/convert/convert.cgi) Courtesy of PokerZion.com (http://PokerZion.com)

Hero ($10.25)
SB ($5.20)
BB ($10)
UTG ($3.05)
MP ($14.35)
CO ($9.40)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 6/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, 6/images/graemlins/heart.gif.
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $0.35</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB calls $0.25.

Flop: ($0.75) 3/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 2/images/graemlins/club.gif, 9/images/graemlins/spade.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $0.55</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $1.1</font>, Hero calls $0.55.

Turn: ($2.95) 2/images/graemlins/spade.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">BB bets $1.4</font>, Hero calls $1.40.

River: ($5.75) 3/images/graemlins/diamond.gif <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $4.75</font>

hoyasaxa
10-19-2007, 03:13 PM
basically, i have no clue what villain would play like this.
But I dont think villain has a 2, 3, or flush, and dont really think villain can call without one. Basically im reacting to a read of weakness. The problem is i think im going to get called down way too light at nl10, while this might work at, say, nl 400

finalboarder
10-19-2007, 03:31 PM
Villians play has me confused too. But at 10NL and no reads you really don't know if villian is doing this with 95 and calling the river. I think that I would usually fold on the flop with my underpair to a reraise. But maybe I'm being weak.

well named
10-19-2007, 03:43 PM
I'm guessing most likely villain has a 9 with an OK kicker and doesn't like the board too much.

Nevertheless, whether or not your river bet will work depends a great deal on how likely he is to lay down a one pair hand on this board. I don't think I try this without at least some read on the villain, but against someone who has shown some weak-tight tendencies this is a good spot to bluff.

Most of the time though the board isn't going to cooperate this much so I think calling the flop is -EV in general. The kind of player who is check-raising this flop without some kind of hand is not the kind of player who is check-folding this river very often

Waingro
10-19-2007, 05:46 PM
I donīt get it, what did you put him on the turn? I think calling the turn against an unknown is much more spewtastic than bluffing this river. The river I donīt know really, he obviously doesnīt like his hand much but will he fold a 9? Your line doesnīt really make much sense unless you are repping a 3 and he might not believe you. My advice is donīt get to the river this way in the first place.

Sniiii
10-19-2007, 05:51 PM
There's tons of players who play A-9, K-9, T-9 and alike, so I'm not sure why you're calling turn. At least I'd fold there. And definitely fold river?

SuperMxyz
10-19-2007, 06:13 PM
I don't see him laying down his 9 or flush very often.

marimba man
10-19-2007, 06:30 PM
So wait... You did a 2 street float followed by a bet that turns you hand into a bluff...? Oh I forgot to add that you have no read which makes this play even stranger. The river bet is never good at any level imo.

Nologo
10-19-2007, 06:52 PM
Pretty much anything but pure value betting is too fancy for 10nl.