6 Max Vs Full Ring...Discuss!

[The 13th 4postle]

I like full ring because there is more money on the table and when you get a major hand you are more likely to get paid off. A couple of 2+2's have told me that 6 max is more profitable, I can't figure out why.

Which one do you prefer and why?

[LiveNow]

i prefer not to read posts like this.

[absoludicrous]

What [censored] pisses me off to no end is when I get my mobnies in as a 98% favorite, get sucked out on, and then cannot win another pot against the same villain. They always leave with my money. That [censored] irritates me beyond belief. [censored].

[Maunzekater]

[ QUOTE ]
What [censored] pisses me off to no end is when I get my mobnies in as a 98% favorite, get sucked out on, and then cannot win another pot against the same villain. They always leave with my money. That [censored] irritates me beyond belief. [censored].

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT.

[NL Newbie]

2PTBB at FR.
10PTBB at 6max + more fun.

[whyzze]

More hand + more agression = more money.

[vixticator]

Full ring makes me want to murder people, all nits. The nits in 6max get owned because they fold too much. Loose players give lots of action and suck. I play well post-flop for the most part. 6max no brainer. I'd go on instatilt in full ring due to the nits.

[elstunar]

agree with most comments here, i used to play FR a long time ago, i didn't win near as much money or run at as good of a rate as i do now, i used to run at like 3-4 ptbb, now @ 6max i'm running @ 9 over more hands than i played @ FR...more hands, play better post flop, more aggression, etc

[Dr_Doctr]

I used to single-table full-ring limit.

[AusDerBunker]

[ QUOTE ]
I used to single-table full-ring limit.

[/ QUOTE ]


Case closed!


(If you like to 23 table, then FR is your game!)