pokerpunchout
10-04-2007, 04:48 PM
http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/reports/noticeofproposedrule .pdf
If I am reading this right it looks like a cut out for writing and mailing a personal check was included in this. Does this mean sites like Party could open up to US players again as long as they only accept paper checks and cash out in paper checks?
Here is a quote from Reuters:
"The Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve issued a plan requiring bank policies and procedures that are "reasonably designed to prevent payments being made to gambling businesses in connection with unlawful Internet gambling," they said in a statement.
The new U.S. regulations would make the banks responsible for blocking credit and debit card payments for online gambling. It also bars bank customers such as online casinos from receiving Internet gambling proceeds.
"I think that that's doable," an industry source said of the proposal.
But industry officials said it seemed that regulators had addressed their biggest concern about the new law. The agencies concluded it was "not reasonably practical" for the banks to identify and block customers from sending checks and making some other types of transfers."
If I am reading this right it looks like a cut out for writing and mailing a personal check was included in this. Does this mean sites like Party could open up to US players again as long as they only accept paper checks and cash out in paper checks?
Here is a quote from Reuters:
"The Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve issued a plan requiring bank policies and procedures that are "reasonably designed to prevent payments being made to gambling businesses in connection with unlawful Internet gambling," they said in a statement.
The new U.S. regulations would make the banks responsible for blocking credit and debit card payments for online gambling. It also bars bank customers such as online casinos from receiving Internet gambling proceeds.
"I think that that's doable," an industry source said of the proposal.
But industry officials said it seemed that regulators had addressed their biggest concern about the new law. The agencies concluded it was "not reasonably practical" for the banks to identify and block customers from sending checks and making some other types of transfers."