CobraGoat
09-21-2007, 03:36 PM
No Hand history.
50NL 6max, no good reads, villain seemed loose PF, that is all, effective stacks $50.
Hero UTG dealt KK, raises to $2, villain MP calls, all else fold. No flush worries.
Flop: Q95r
Hero bets $4, villain calls.
Turn: 7
Hero bets $9 villain calls
River: J
Hero? b/f, b/c, c/c, or c/f?
My feelings are b/f > b/c >>> c/c >> c/f but i might be way off on that. The problem with b/f is that if villain shoves I am getting like 5.5:1 odds, problem with b/c is that if villain comes over the top im good very rarely as i've repped a strong hand the whole way. c/c sucks cuz there are no apparent draws that villain may have whiffed on to make inducing a bluff profitable and c/f is sooo weak.
Thoughts?
50NL 6max, no good reads, villain seemed loose PF, that is all, effective stacks $50.
Hero UTG dealt KK, raises to $2, villain MP calls, all else fold. No flush worries.
Flop: Q95r
Hero bets $4, villain calls.
Turn: 7
Hero bets $9 villain calls
River: J
Hero? b/f, b/c, c/c, or c/f?
My feelings are b/f > b/c >>> c/c >> c/f but i might be way off on that. The problem with b/f is that if villain shoves I am getting like 5.5:1 odds, problem with b/c is that if villain comes over the top im good very rarely as i've repped a strong hand the whole way. c/c sucks cuz there are no apparent draws that villain may have whiffed on to make inducing a bluff profitable and c/f is sooo weak.
Thoughts?