PDA

View Full Version : Was this to be expected?


Eaglesfan1
08-31-2007, 02:45 PM
From Cardplayer.com


New Tax Law Takes Bite Out of Tournament Winnings
Law Will Require Casinos to Take 25 Percent of $5,000 or More
A new tax code has been released that spells out just how much money the government will take from those who are lucky enough to cash for $5,000 or more in poker tournaments.

Starting March 4, 2008, casinos and card rooms are suppose to start withholding 25 percent of any poker tournament winnings $5,000 or more. This will particularly affect the poker hobbyists who go deep in tournaments with buy-ins that range from $100 to $550, and of course those who make their living humping the tournament poker trail.

Language in the new tax code pointed to a Tax Court ruling that took place earlier this year. The ruling held that tournament poker is not a skillful competition and should be considered a gambling activity, at least for the purposes of taxation.

The law requires casinos and card rooms to withhold and report the winnings from a player if its $5,000 or more in a tax year. The code doesn't not address winnings from online poker sites or from casinos off U.S. soil.

Here’s an example of how much money the government will be making off poker tournaments after March 4, 2008. If the law was in effect earlier this month, the top seven finishers of the $500 event that took place Aug. 7, at the Legends of Poker would have paid a total of $40,221 in taxes.

The runner-up of this tournament, which attracted a healthy 460 entrants, would have taken home $27,972 after taxes ($37,295 before). The winner received $74,585. If the law was in place, that amount would’ve been $18,646 less.

The notice that was released to accounting firms this week follows:

Background. Under Code Sec. 3402(q)(3)(C)(i), payors must withhold 25% on proceeds of more than $5,000 from a sweepstakes, wagering pool or lottery (other than a state-conducted lottery, covered by another withholding rule). Proceeds from a wager are determined by reducing the amount received by the amount of the wager. (Code Sec. 3402(q)(4)(A))
Facts. A poker tournament sponsor charges an entry fee and a buy-in fee for each participant. In exchange for paying the buy-in fee, a participant receives a set of poker chips with a nominal face value for use in the specific poker tournament. The sponsor pays amounts, which exceed a participant's fees by $5,000, to a certain number of tournament winner(s), out of a pool made up of all the participants' fees.

Poker tournament sponsors must withhold. Rev Proc 2007-57, which is effective for payments made on or after Mar. 4, 2008, says poker tournament sponsors (including casinos) paying amounts to winners in a manner substantially similar to the facts above, must under Code Sec. 3403(q) withhold and report on payments of more than $5,000 made to a winning payee in a tax year. They must furnish a copy of the information return to IRS on or before Feb. 28 (Mar. 31 if filed electronically) of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the payment is made. Rev Proc 2007-57 cites legislative history for the proposition that the term "wagering pool" includes all pari-mutuel betting pools, including on- and off-track racing pools, and similar types of betting pools. It also cites a non-tax case (U.S. v. Berent, (CA 9 1975) 523 F.2d 1360, 1361), holding that in common usage "pool" means "a particular gambling practice, an arrangement whereby all bets constitute a common fund to be taken by the winner or winners."

IRS said it won't assert any liability for additional tax or additions to tax for violations of any withholding obligation relating to amounts paid to winners of poker tournaments under Code Sec. 3402, as long as the poker tournament sponsor meets all of the requirements for information reporting under Code Sec. 3402(q) and its regs.

RIA observation: Earlier this year, the Tax Court held that tournament poker is a wagering activity for purposes of the Code Sec. 165(d) limit on gambling losses. See Federal Taxes Weekly Alert 03/01/2007.




This seems like a bunch of crap to me that will wreak havoc with tournaments pros and their tax returns.


"The ruling held that tournament poker is not a skillful competition and should be considered a gambling activity, at least for the purposes of taxation."

Surely we can fight this right?

aceskay
08-31-2007, 03:46 PM
This seems like a TERRIBLE ruling. I thought that previously, in a case that Doyle Brunson often references, Billy Baxter won a court case that deemed poker a skillful game?

Any legal experts care to share some insight into this?

binions
08-31-2007, 03:51 PM
I thought it had to be more than 300x the entry fee before federal income tax withholding:

http://www.irs.gov/instructions/iw2g/ar02.html#d0e125

http://www.gambling-law-us.com/Articles-Notes/W2Gs-debunking.htm

tangled
08-31-2007, 04:26 PM
I don't get it -- is this a new rate, or just an adjustment on how much is withheld? To put it another way, are professionals paying more taxes now, or are they just having more taxes held back until they file their returns?

JPFisher55
08-31-2007, 04:29 PM
I don't think that it matters whether poker is a game of skill or not; winnings from poker are taxable income. But requiring withholding of them, rather than a 1099, is another example of the Bush Administration war on gambling.

adanthar
08-31-2007, 04:34 PM
[ QUOTE ]
This seems like a bunch of crap to me that will wreak havoc with tournaments pros and their tax returns.

[/ QUOTE ]

Speaking as a tourney pro, this basically means (if I play a lot live) I'll be overpaying a lot in estimated taxes. It shouldn't have an impact on me otherwise, and of course I'll get it back as a tax refund later, but it's annoying.

tangled
08-31-2007, 05:01 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This seems like a bunch of crap to me that will wreak havoc with tournaments pros and their tax returns.

[/ QUOTE ]

Speaking as a tourney pro, this basically means (if I play a lot live) I'll be overpaying a lot in estimated taxes. It shouldn't have an impact on me otherwise, and of course I'll get it back as a tax refund later, but it's annoying.

[/ QUOTE ]

This pretty much answers my questions.

Russ Fox
08-31-2007, 05:18 PM
I just received a copy of the Revenue Procedure this afternoon, and I have just posted my analysis. (http://www.taxabletalk.com/posts/1188594494.shtml)

I think the IRS got the law wrong, but I don't think any casino or cardroom will fight this. Additionally, once casinos start having to issue W-2Gs to some winners, I think they'll begin issuing them to all winners (it makes their procedures easier).

While in theory this shouldn't impact anyone (because everyone is obeying the tax laws), on a practical basis this will have a major impact. I suspect that maybe 10% of individuals file correctly (vis-a-vis gambling). The IRS will see increased collections as a result of this Revenue Procedure. And the poker economy--especially the poker tournament economy--will take a hit.

-- Russ Fox

MiltonFriedman
08-31-2007, 06:14 PM
Once again, online poker has a competitive advantage increased versus US based operations....

Merkle
08-31-2007, 06:32 PM
I still have to wonder if it would not be benefical to have the poker winnings ruled income the same as a chess player etc rather than gambling winnings. I also don't like the reference to a game of chance as I would think that could be used by some judges in detemining if poker is a game of skill or luck.

Cactus Jack
08-31-2007, 07:14 PM
Between the juice and the withholding, if it wasn't luck, it is now. Because of the way the IRS deals with non-professional gamblers, I'd expect to see tournament entries take a nosedive. Once people find out the govt is causing 25% of the win withheld, they'll stop playing.

GG, IRS. Want to come over and squeeze my lemons even more?

Russ Fox
08-31-2007, 07:32 PM
[ QUOTE ]

I still have to wonder if it would not be benefical to have the poker winnings ruled income the same as a chess player etc rather than gambling winnings.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not going to happen quickly. The Tax Court ruled in Tschetschot v. Commissioner (http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/Tschetschot.TCM.WPD.pdf) that poker tournaments are a form of gambling. While you and I may think that poker tournaments are a game of skill (and it may be that the Tax Court would agree with that), they are also a form of gambling in the mind of the IRS and the Tax Court. I think it will take legislation to change that...and that might be years away.

-- Russ Fox

Eaglesfan1
08-31-2007, 08:01 PM
Need some clarification here, say your a professional tournament player, you've made cashes worth 900k throughout the year and have had 225k withheld. But your tournament buy ins totaled 300k for the year for a 600k profit. Are we still paying 600k worth of taxes at the same rate?

bekman
09-01-2007, 12:52 AM
I am afraid this will also cause poker tournament players to have more audits. You can imagine that the IRS will be looking for any way to keep from cutting back a $50k+ check in refund. Once they have your money, they don't like to hand it back.

Cactus Jack
09-01-2007, 08:42 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I am afraid this will also cause poker tournament players to have more audits. You can imagine that the IRS will be looking for any way to keep from cutting back a $50k+ check in refund. Once they have your money, they don't like to hand it back.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol sure

DeadMoneyDad
09-02-2007, 12:55 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Need some clarification here, say your a professional tournament player, you've made cashes worth 900k throughout the year and have had 225k withheld. But your tournament buy ins totaled 300k for the year for a 600k profit. Are we still paying 600k worth of taxes at the same rate?

[/ QUOTE ]

The proposed reg, states that the with-holding is based on net winnings, your cash less your buy-in. The main issue seems to be one of the court cases cited as justification when a gambling pool is used.

Under curent tax law a payment of over $600 is supposed to trigger a W2-G, there has been in the past an exemption for table games. This as based on the casino arguement that the amount at risk wasn't know with enough certianty to basically pass the paperwork reduction act test among others.

The tax treatment for declared and accepted professional gamblers is slightly different. But in general all winnings are counted as additions to gross income. Losses are deductible up to the amount of winnings but not netted out. You have to claim losses as itemized deductions.

For most people this means even slightly winning years you end up paying more tax than is really fair. Also given that previous years losses are not carried forward or backwards is another glaring problem.

Currently the IRS only allowes you to net winnings and losses for a single session. You can have one big win and a bunch of loosing sessions and overall be in the negative for the year or even month but still owe taxes on in effect phantom income.

D$D

oldbookguy
09-02-2007, 09:56 AM
I have watched and read posts on this subject for sometime now.

The reality for business is the same for pro poker players.

Small business pays taxes by the quarter. If, when I was running mine I had a great quarter, I paid taxes on it. Later, if the next two were bad, I paid less.
At the year-end, taxes are then refigured on the total year, if I paid too much for that great quarter, I got it back.

Same in poker. Taxes are figured and paid per tournament / quarter.
At the year-end they are recalculated for the ENTIRE year, any over payment is refunded.

As a note, if a business ends up in the negative that is NOT carried over to the next year you start all over again at zero.

The ONLY difference is say I had OTHER income from stocks / bonds / rentals or whatever. IF my business lost money I could apply that loss to my other income.

With Poker / Gambling you cannot. Fair, no; the small business model is used by many to ‘lose’ some money to offset other income.

With that in mind, let me tell you, there are many ways to ‘lose’ money while actually making money.

obg