PDA

View Full Version : Played set poorly/weak on river?


fromak
08-17-2007, 07:05 AM
I don't think I bet enough on the flop? Also, I was so scared that the flush hit that I checked the river. Maybe I should've been the first to push but I just don't see what he could've called flop with. I was kind of tilting from getting outdrawn by KK the previous hand with AA so I weak called I feel like.

Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.05/$0.10 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker (http://www.legopoker.com) Hand History Converter (http://www.legopoker.com/hh))

SB: $10.75
Hero (BB): $10.00
UTG: $11.55
MP: $7.95
CO: $16.45
BTN: $10.95

Preflop: Hero is dealt 7/images/graemlins/spade.gif 7/images/graemlins/heart.gif (6 Players)
UTG calls $0.10, 2 folds, BTN calls $0.10, SB folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $0.60</font>, UTG calls $0.50, BTN folds

Flop: ($1.35) 7/images/graemlins/diamond.gif 4/images/graemlins/diamond.gif 9/images/graemlins/spade.gif (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $1.00</font>, UTG calls $1.00

Turn: ($3.35) T/images/graemlins/diamond.gif (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $3.00</font>, UTG calls $3.00

River: ($9.35) 3/images/graemlins/diamond.gif (2 Players)
Hero checks, <font color="red">UTG bets all-in for $6.95</font>, Hero calls all-in for $5.40
Uncalled bet of $1.55 returned to UTG

Pot Size: $20.15 ($2 Rake)

UTG had T/images/graemlins/club.gif K/images/graemlins/club.gif ([Tc Kc] a pair of Tens) and LOST (-$10.00)
Hero had 7/images/graemlins/spade.gif 7/images/graemlins/heart.gif (three of a kind, Sevens) and WON (+$8.15)

members_only
08-17-2007, 09:01 AM
I think you played it fine apart from the river (unless you had a read that villain was a maniac)

Edit: By which I mean I would have thought it was a fairly easy c/f

bob_sacamano
08-17-2007, 09:35 AM
It was a fact that he was goin to bet the river if a diamond fall and you checked it.

hard to play, gotta have a real good read to make that call. otherwise, fold it.

Mrage
08-17-2007, 09:39 AM
It looks ok until the river call. The 4-flush is enough to scare me off there without a read, he looks like he's drawing to a flush the whole time. That said, it's pretty thin there either way so in the wild I might make the call, I wouldn't beat yourself up over it getting those odds. I wholly expect to lose to a flush most of the time there though.

choccypie
08-17-2007, 09:54 AM
If you know you're going to call the river when he bets, it's best to bet it first yourself. That way he'll fold if he doesn't have a flush and thinks you do. It just puts the ball in your court /images/graemlins/smile.gif

members_only
08-17-2007, 12:37 PM
[ QUOTE ]
If you know you're going to call the river when he bets, it's best to bet it first yourself. That way he'll fold if he doesn't have a flush and thinks you do. It just puts the ball in your court /images/graemlins/smile.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

That way you get absolutely no value as if he doesn't have a flush you have the best hand and it would be better to give him the opportunity to bluff

Better reasons might be that you could get him to fold a low flush or that you avoid the 'negative freeroll' should you have decided that you're going to pay him off if he bets

mynameisslime
11-18-2007, 11:00 AM
yea played it weak try harder next time

Monster207
11-18-2007, 11:16 AM
I think the river is a fold, especially when he shoves. This just seems to be long term -ev. I would also be sure to make a note on this guy as he obviously seems like a total donk and this is a pretty huge exploitable leak.