LC: Hand Reading Exercise

[relativity_x]

I'm interested in what ranges everyone puts the two villains on.

No meaningful reads.

STACKS
<font color="brown">
SB(32.55)
BTN(25)
</font>
Preflop:(0.35)
<font color="gray">UTG folds, MP folds</font>, CO calls 0.25,<font color="red"> BTN raises to 0.50</font>, SB calls 0.40, BB folds, CO calls 0.25.

Flop:(1.75) T /images/graemlins/heart.gif 6 /images/graemlins/spade.gif 7 /images/graemlins/club.gif
<font color="red">SB bets 1.25</font>,<font color="gray"> CO folds</font>, BTN calls 1.25

Turn:(4.25) 2 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif
<font color="red">SB bets 2.25</font>, <font color="red">BTN raises to 4.5</font>, SB calls 2.50

River:(13.25) J /images/graemlins/heart.gif
SB checks, <font color="red">BTN bets 8.25</font>, SB calls 8.25

[Spurious]

Button: AT,KT,QQ+
SB: 89 or twopair

[Peter Harris]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm interested in what ranges everyone puts the two villains on.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok...

[ QUOTE ]
No meaningful reads.

[/ QUOTE ]

not a good start.

given no reads and the play, button could have AA-TT, or AT, or 22, 66, 77, maybe 88/99 if he's a lagtard, or air if he's insane.

again, no reads, SB could have as much as 89 or as little as a pair of 2s depending on how retarded he is. although i'd expect to see Tx which isn't 2 pair which a crap villain is showing down since he's a retard.


Next time we have a "Hand Reading Exercise", what say we get some reads, like we usually have in real life?

[relativity_x]

You don't have to have reads to give a general range of hands.

In fact with no reads, there's no way SB has 89 as he check/calls river.

I think these are useful tools that everyone will benefit from. If you don't want to share, then don't.

[TheBobn]

Honestly, no reads, ATC for both. CO limps and button minraises, they are both thus terrible or play weirdly. SB is reacting to their donkishness so there is no context for hsi plays either.

[relativity_x]

the hands are well defined post flop as both players like their hand especially with SB donk betting out into a MW pot.

[Spurious]

Yeah your right. I think some two pair.

[corsakh]

Ok.

raise, call

Button: ATC
SB: 22-99, AT+, JT+, 56s+, no limit here - proportional to players stupidity

donk, call

Button: 25% of ATC
SB: Tx, 99, 88, 68s, 69s, 78s, 79s

donk, minraise, call

Button: 89, T6, T7, 67, 66, 77, TT, JJ+
SB: see above

check, bet, call

Button: see above, more tilted towards QQ+
SB: Tx

[relativity_x]

you've nailed BTNs range.

close to SBs

very nice sir.

[Check_The_Nuts]

small blind has some sort of top pair. Big blind has that beat. THeir both terrible players so I can't give hand ranges. EIther could also be on a horrible bluff, except I guess SB cause wtf? bluffcall river?

[relativity_x]

RESULTS IN WHITE BELOW:
<font color="white">
SB had 77
BTN had 89s for the nutz
</font>
BTNs minraise turn was pretty funny though.
SB check/called so I guess not too bad.

BTN however wasted the nutz.

I wish other posters would start doing these ever so often. I like to read hands without knowing the outcome, and then have it revealed later.

fwiw, I had btn on straight/two pair and SB on two pair/tx.

[Mr_Pathetic]

SB has AT, KT, QT, and button has 89 for slowplayed monster

[Mr_Pathetic]

[ QUOTE ]
RESULTS IN WHITE BELOW:
<font color="white">
SB had 77
BTN had 89s for the nutz
</font>
BTNs minraise turn was pretty funny though.
SB check/called so I guess not too bad.

BTN however wasted the nutz.

I wish other posters would start doing these ever so often. I like to read hands without knowing the outcome, and then have it revealed later.

fwiw, I had btn on straight/two pair and SB on two pair/tx.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL glad I did not read this before i posted

BTN was too easy here.