uk123
07-12-2007, 04:56 AM
I've returned to NL (mainly .25/.50 ) after a few months with a real commitment to become a profitable player. In total I've been playing for about 4 months. I'll many chapters from several of the classic poker books, such as Skalansky and own a copy of Poker Academy Pro.
After consitently losing money (however with good spells), even playing reasonably tight I have tried a new approach the last few evenings, only playing the top 10 or so hands. (while maintaining sufficent aggression). So far this seems to be working, I'm risking less money on drawing hands like suited connectors. I see the flop about 20% of the time and still get called by enough players when occansionally enter the pot, even with a raise.
In general, is this a reasonable approah to 'beating' the .25/.50 stakes?
Also I have been using a standard raise of $1 (only two times the BB). This seems to be effective at knocking out calkers apart from 1-2. Is this too low?
After consitently losing money (however with good spells), even playing reasonably tight I have tried a new approach the last few evenings, only playing the top 10 or so hands. (while maintaining sufficent aggression). So far this seems to be working, I'm risking less money on drawing hands like suited connectors. I see the flop about 20% of the time and still get called by enough players when occansionally enter the pot, even with a raise.
In general, is this a reasonable approah to 'beating' the .25/.50 stakes?
Also I have been using a standard raise of $1 (only two times the BB). This seems to be effective at knocking out calkers apart from 1-2. Is this too low?