PDA

View Full Version : Meeting with Senator Rockefeller Office June 22


oldbookguy
06-22-2007, 05:45 PM
First let me say, he is against gambling such as sports wagering, slots and such.

I was expecting a 5 minute meeting and it ended up lasting a little more than 30 minutes. That was encouraging as there developed real interest in this whoole mess.

However, given that there are many 'SKILL' games that Kyl and that group NEVER told anyone about, a door has been opened, a little.

He is most upset that a treaty obligation is being broken and the reality now is it should be a Senate issue since this is their domain so to speak.

At the end of the meeting a comment was made to me; "if this was not so serious it would be comical a game of cards can cause such a international problem". I of course agreed. It would be comical if it were not really to important now given the developments.

Following is the letter I hand delivered that in turn is being taken back to Washington along with notes made during our talk.

NOTE: When I mention in the letter the sites, actual screen printouts were included.

MY NAME HERE
XXXXXXXXXX
WV
Ph. XXX XXX XXXX
E-Mail oldbookguy@verizon.net


Honorable John D. Rockefeller IV
531 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-4802

Honorable Rockefeller,

I am well aware members of the Senate and House of Representatives are quit busy with matters of true importance to our country (and myself) such as immigration, tax issues, social security and more.

Sadly a simple card game is about to add to an already full plate. This need not be the case however.

I wrote you some time back concerning my opposition to UIGEA / Safe Ports Act and at that time you expressed support for the UIGEA. My opposition to the UIGEA is not the act itself. Rather it is the confusion it has caused and the unintended consequences.
To quote Rep. Peter King, a sponsor and supporter of the UIGEA legislation he said in essence; “We never intended poker to be included”. Mr. King is now a co-sponsor of several bills introduced in the House to rectify this. These however are not needed and I will apparent to clarify this as to why.

As I am sure your office is now aware we recently lost the final hearing before the WTO concerning the Cross Border Supply of Gaming Services. As a result we (the U.S.) have decided to no longer fight this. Instead the Bush administration has decided to take the unprecedented step and simply withdraw from that portion of the GATS – WTO agreement we signed under President Clinton.
Following this decision Antigua, the E.U. (communities), India and Japan have all now filed claims against the U.S. over our failure to honor the agreement we signed allowing this, WTO Schedule 964, sub section 9649.
Billions of dollars in trade sanctions against American companies are now at stake.

This need not be the case. As with all matters simple solutions do exist if parties are truly willing to compromise and look at matters in a rational way.

Concerning the UIGEA I believe Rep. Bachus from Alabama said it best, “The UIGEA only affects that which is already illegal” which brings me to a simple solution for everyone.

Online ‘SKILL’ wagering IS NOT illegal in the United States nor is Interstate Internet Wagering on these games except in 14 states where ‘SKILL’ wagering is specifically banned as well.

Internet sites such as AOL, MSN and YAHOO! offer legal wagering games of ‘SKILL’ by companies located within and outside the United States in conjunction with companies such as www.worldwinner.com. (http://www.worldwinner.com.) Since passage of the UIGEA these companies are thriving with revenues up 159% over the same period as last year before passage of the UIGEA (See attachments).
These games include but are not limited to card games such as Solitaire, Hearts, Spades and Free Cell. Additionally they include board games, puzzle games, word games and more. ALL of these games perfectly legal and exempted from the UIGEA.

These sites employ age verification, anti money laundering protections and follow all U.S. laws concerning payout-reporting requirements to the IRS and Foreign Bank Account reporting of balances that exceed the $10,000.00 level in a given year by requiring the player to complete and submit IRS Form 90-22.1 before any additional transactions may take place.

In light of the fact these ‘Legal Wagering’ games include card games a simple solution exists, include Poker and its various forms with these games and subject any company offering these games to the same rigorous rules and standards as the ‘SKILL’ wagers sites.
Of course any Internet site NOT doing this would be in violation of many laws and the UIGEA.

By doing so these companies will be subject to over-site as the current companies are and they will also then be paying U.S. taxes (a boon for all).
Additionally by taking this simple action the following benefits will be realized:
1. UIGEA can be preserved and no additional congressional legislation will be needed or required. This can be done administratively.
2. True games of chance such as slots, sports wagering and games played against the house will remain banned.
3. This solution in all likelihood will satisfy those filing massive claims against the U.S. and those claims will be dropped.
4. Taxes will be realized to help fund such important matters like Health Care for those most in need.
5. Concerns over money laundering will be addressed.
6. Concerns over children playing will be addressed.
7. Concerns over additive gambling in that these regulated sites have limits on daily, weekly and monthly deposit.


POTENTIAL JOB GROWTH IN WV

This also presents a potential for job growth in our state. In order to adequately monitor these additional companies for compliance and those that are not complying there will be a need for staff to implement this.
This office would be a nice fit in the High Tech Corridor in Northern West Virginia. Of course this office would be funded easily by the estimated 3-5 Billion dollars in tax revenue this simple administrative ruling will generate.

Let me add here, job growth and creation is something you five members of our WV Delegation has been EXTREMELY adept at and it is greatly appreciated!

The U. S. House is attempting to work this out legislatively; I feel with a bit of input from your office (working with other members of the WV delegation) this can be quickly and easily resolved administratively leaving members of the Senate and the House to work on matters of actual great importance to myself and other Americans.

Additionally this solution will avert setting an unprecedented precedence in the WTO as NO member has ever withdrawn from a treaty obligation. This solution will allow the U.S. to maintain that. Games of true chance that are not allowed in interstate transactions can be maintained.

Of course Horse Wagering will have to be allowed International Access but it would be required to only operate in a state that allows Internet wagering on Horse Racing.

Additionally, ‘SKILL’ gaming would be limited to the states that allow / do not have statutes prohibiting this. Technology is in place that can prevent this and is utilized by the ‘SKILL’ gaming companies.

We here in the U.S. rely heavily on the WTO to protect American interests and a simple card game should NOT be the cause to jeopardize that.

Sincerely,

MY NAME HERE
XXXXXXXXXX
WV
Phone: XXX XXX XXXX

CC – Sen. Robert Byrd
Rep. Shelly Moore Capito
Rep. Alan Mollohan
Rep. Nick Rahall.

autobet
06-22-2007, 05:55 PM
Nice Work!

Perseus
06-22-2007, 06:01 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Nice Work!

[/ QUOTE ]

oldbookguy
06-22-2007, 06:14 PM
Thanks, I must say though the main interest was peeked when we talked about porking the jobs to WV with the FBI Finger print center here already.

He immediatly said, at least 100 jobs, now that will really interest the senator. lol. That's my WV group, the pork kings!

obg

SoftcoreRevolt
06-22-2007, 06:51 PM
That is really great news that even one Senator with his initial stance would see the gravity of this situation.

Tuff_Fish
06-22-2007, 07:23 PM
A very similar letter, tweaked to emphasize lost California intellectual property, will be on it's way soon to Fienstien and Boxer. Thanks for doing the heavy work for me.

I will send to Brian Bilbray too. He is one district over. My current congressman, the eminently hopeless, highly Baptist Duncan Hunter has decided he should run for President.

Tuff

Coy_Roy
06-22-2007, 08:25 PM
[ QUOTE ]
3. This solution in all likelihood will satisfy those filing massive claims against the U.S. and those claims will be dropped.

[/ QUOTE ]


No, Antigua won't be satisfied untill all forms of gambling are allowed.

Uglyowl
06-22-2007, 08:45 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I am well aware members of the Senate and House of Representatives are quit busy with matters of true importance to our country (and myself) such as immigration, tax issues, social security and more.

Sadly a simple card game is about to add to an already full plate. This need not be the case however.

[/ QUOTE ]

I love the beginning of your letter.. Well done OBG, I will be sending out alot of letters this weekend.

Jzo19
06-22-2007, 08:52 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nice Work!

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

CountingMyOuts
06-22-2007, 10:18 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nice Work!

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

zimmer879
06-22-2007, 10:23 PM
Excellent work and that letter is damn near perfect!

TheEngineer
06-22-2007, 10:31 PM
Very nice work.

Backspin20
06-23-2007, 07:43 PM
VNH we need more people like you on our side.
Thanks!

PrimogenitoX
06-24-2007, 01:21 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nice Work!

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

TheEngineer
06-24-2007, 01:57 AM
www.clububt.com (http://www.clububt.com) offers online tournamant blackjack and poker. Claims to be legal in most states.

From their site:

Club UBT is the future of online play. It is an exciting new way to play poker tournaments and Elimination Blackjack tournaments online without risking a penny! It's fun, it's legal, it's EASY. Members pay a low monthly fee of $19.95 (or less!) and are awarded many perks and benefits:

Entry into over 1,000 cash-and-prize tourneys
Subscription to All In magazine
Subscription to the Las Vegas Advisor
Monthly newsletter
Tips from pros like Phil Hellmuth, Johnny Chan, Annie Duke, etc.
$1,000s in Las Vegas coupons
Live chat support

--------------------------------------------------

Eligible States:

Alaska
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
D.C.
Delaware
Florida
Hawaii
Illinois
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Massachusetts
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

oldbookguy
06-24-2007, 09:32 AM
Looks like someone in the poker world finally listened.

A sign of the future.....

obg

TheEngineer
06-24-2007, 10:42 AM
[ QUOTE ]

Looks like someone in the poker world finally listened.

A sign of the future.....

obg

[/ QUOTE ]

Here's what I wrote on my thread about this site:

[ QUOTE ]
True, they can offer a game online. Unfortunately, they don't permit actual betting. Rather, they charge a monthly fee, from which the prizes come. I don't imagine any of us can make a living from any of the "legal" games the way they're structured today. After all, the fish at today's games lose more than $19.95/mo.

It appears we need legislation to get what we want...games where real money moves around.

[/ QUOTE ]

blutarski
06-24-2007, 03:30 PM
[ QUOTE ]
www.clububt.com (http://www.clububt.com) offers online tournamant blackjack and poker. Claims to be legal in most states.

From their site:

Club UBT is the future of online play. It is an exciting new way to play poker tournaments and Elimination Blackjack tournaments online without risking a penny! It's fun, it's legal, it's EASY. Members pay a low monthly fee of $19.95 (or less!) and are awarded many perks and benefits:

Entry into over 1,000 cash-and-prize tourneys
Subscription to All In magazine
Subscription to the Las Vegas Advisor
Monthly newsletter
Tips from pros like Phil Hellmuth, Johnny Chan, Annie Duke, etc.
$1,000s in Las Vegas coupons
Live chat support

--------------------------------------------------

Eligible States:

Alaska
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
D.C.
Delaware
Florida
Hawaii
Illinois
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Massachusetts
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

[/ QUOTE ]

Dang! I wish I could remember the site I first joined...it was pretty much the same thing-pay a membership fee. It seemed -EV for me at the time, considering my skill level.

I hope it doesn't come down to this, or I'll probably have to quit online poker.

TheEngineer
06-24-2007, 04:00 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Dang! I wish I could remember the site I first joined...it was pretty much the same thing-pay a membership fee. It seemed -EV for me at the time, considering my skill level.

I hope it doesn't come down to this, or I'll probably have to quit online poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

True. This isn't what we're fighting for. We need real cash on the games, like we have today. I like this for a moral argument, but not for a goal.

Coy_Roy
06-24-2007, 04:53 PM
[ QUOTE ]
www.clububt.com (http://www.clububt.com) offers online tournamant blackjack and poker. Claims to be legal in most states.

From their site:

Club UBT is the future of online play. It is an exciting new way to play poker tournaments and Elimination Blackjack tournaments online without risking a penny! It's fun, it's legal, it's EASY. Members pay a low monthly fee of $19.95 (or less!) and are awarded many perks and benefits:

Entry into over 1,000 cash-and-prize tourneys
Subscription to All In magazine
Subscription to the Las Vegas Advisor
Monthly newsletter
Tips from pros like Phil Hellmuth, Johnny Chan, Annie Duke, etc.
$1,000s in Las Vegas coupons
Live chat support

--------------------------------------------------

Eligible States:

Alaska
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
D.C.
Delaware
Florida
Hawaii
Illinois
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Massachusetts
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

[/ QUOTE ]


Isn't this basically the UB folks remarketing the same software they are already using?

oldbookguy
06-24-2007, 05:39 PM
true, but it is a good start.

At least someone is standing up and saying, here we are, now what?

obg

TheEngineer
06-24-2007, 05:56 PM
[ QUOTE ]

true, but it is a good start.

At least someone is standing up and saying, here we are, now what?

obg

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. I've used it in my own letters. Still, it's not where we want to end up. Let's use it as a moral lever, but accept that we may need further legislation to have sites where one can bet cash on individual hands.

Headblader
06-24-2007, 06:08 PM
Excellent work!!! Would be so nice to have hold em at the tri state dog track, I live like 10 minutes from there. Have you gotten anything out of Robert Byrd's camp on the issue?

TheEngineer
06-24-2007, 09:24 PM
[ QUOTE ]

true, but it is a good start.

At least someone is standing up and saying, here we are, now what?

obg

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course. I thank you for your efforts. I think we've both been saying "here we are; how do we get to where we need to be?" I think it's great that it's legal in many states to pay a monthly fee, play skilled games, and then get cash and prizes in return. Something we can build on. Thanks for bringing the various sites to everyone's attention.

Looks like the next steps are to push for legislation (using the fact that these skill games you listed are legal as leverage) by discussing the WTO, tax collection, and effective regulation.

oldbookguy
06-24-2007, 10:27 PM
Ty my friend. Actually I think the 'fee' is unnecessary.

The other sites you simply fund your account and play.

You can choose heads up, limited number entries (like a SNG) and large tournaments.
You can select games from 1.00 to around 10.00.

Ah well, this is a start, someone else will jump on the band wagon and test it I hope with a more friendly set up.

obg


[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

true, but it is a good start.

At least someone is standing up and saying, here we are, now what?

obg

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course. I thank you for your efforts. I think we've both been saying "here we are; how do we get to where we need to be?" I think it's great that it's legal in many states to pay a monthly fee, play skilled games, and then get cash and prizes in return. Something we can build on. Thanks for bringing the various sites to everyone's attention.

Looks like the next steps are to push for legislation (using the fact that these skill games you listed are legal as leverage) by discussing the WTO, tax collection, and effective regulation.

[/ QUOTE ]

oldbookguy
08-22-2007, 07:59 PM
It has been sometime now, but a letter finally arrived in response from the Senator's office a few days ago.

No commitments were made. I was informed they are keeping an eye on developments are are aware of both the Frank bill and Wexler's bill in the house.

Following is my return response:

Honorable John D. Rockefeller IV
531 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON DC 20510

Honorable Rockefeller,

Thank you for the recent reply to my letter and meeting with your office concerning the WTO and the conflict the passage of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 (UIGEA) presents and possible ramifications.

One thing I was asked, what effect would sanctions have on West Virginia? Given the breadth of the countries involved; Antigua-Barbuda, The European Communities, Macau (China), Japan and others it is not obvious but certainly there will be detrimental effects.

To date, only Antique has stated an amount sought, 3.4 Billion dollars. This hearing is scheduled for September 24. In response to the other countries involved, the USTR has stated, we are negotiating a settlement that will allow the U.S. to withdraw from the commitment made allowing Internet Betting Services under Section 964, subsection 9649 Other recreational services of the GATS agreement.

Looking at the countries involved, specifically Japan and China, it could be assumed they may seek additional leniency in the Steel Industry, an area we constantly have to protect from foreign competition. Any sanctions again this industry would be devastating and would result in many lost WV jobs.

Complicating matters further, two American Companies with offices in the United Kingdom have entered into the gaming and sports betting market that is being regulated there.
YAHOO! Games, which offers the ‘skill’ based games in the United States and abroad has recently introduce via YAHOO UK Internet Poker (not in the U.S.) to its customers in the E.C.
AOL, which offers ‘skill’, based games in the U.S. is entering the sports betting arena as well via AOL UK.

Considering the E.C. is now a party to the WTO claims against the U. S. this will certainly place the USTR negotiating a settlement at a greater disadvantage.

Although the WTO claim involves Sports Wagering, it includes Poker as well.

As discussed, simply classifying Poker as a game of ‘skill’ along with the other ‘skill’ card games; I.E. Solitaire, Hearts, Spades, etc., would give the USTR some cards to play in this negotiation rather than leaving him drawing dead.

This can be accomplished two ways, support of and passage of Robert Wexler’s Skill Games Protection Act, H.R. 2610 or via the regulations that are yet unpublished for the UIGEA, 2006.

You leadership in this would not only be appreciated, but is likely required.

XXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX

obg

MrWookie
08-23-2007, 01:32 AM
Antique = Antigua?