pokeraz
06-22-2007, 12:08 PM
I realize I should probably put this in Probability but I like the forum and it can certainly use some Math balance the SMP scale -
Your watching a game and a guy makes an amazing play to end the inning. His team then comes up to bat, and as a baseball fan, we always note that, sure enough, the guy who just made the great play is now the first one up. And sure enough, he hits a home run.
Well the other night I'm listening to the game on the radio. Guy makes a great play. Sure enough he leads off the next inning...But the announcers say the following
Joe: "How many times have we seen it, The guy that makes the great catch leads off the next inning"
Dave: "Yup. Really what are the odds?"
Joe: "Well...One in Nine."
If you ask the question, what are the odds that the player who just made that out would lead off the next inning, that would be 1/9.
But if you ask, what are the chances that a random player would make the final out and then lead off the next inning, that would be 1/9 * 1/9, correct? Is it this simplistic?
How does this change if we ask these questions with a specific position player? How do we take into consideration the distribution of outs per position? Or frequency of at bats per position and the frequency of a specific batting order leading off an inning.
According to Elias Sports:
Here's the percentage of the time each batting order slot leads off an inning, with the top of the 1st removed for obvious reason.
1 -- 16.6 %
2 -- 9.3 %
3 -- 8.9 %
4 -- 12.5 %
5 -- 11.4 %
6 -- 10.2 %
7 -- 10.6 %
8 -- 10.6 %
9 -- 9.9 %
Considering that better players are playing more challenging positions and are more likely to be a leadoff hitter getting more at-bats
2007 Leadoff Hitters By Position, up to 6/18/2007
1. CF -- 39.4 %
2. 2B -- 21.2 %
3. SS -- 18.3 %
4. LF -- 9.1 %
5. RF -- 4.9 %
6. 3B -- 3.6 %
7. DH -- 1.5 %
8. C -- 1.0 %
9. 1B -- 0.9 %
I have yet to find a 'outs per position' number but it is probably important.
Other considerations?
Your watching a game and a guy makes an amazing play to end the inning. His team then comes up to bat, and as a baseball fan, we always note that, sure enough, the guy who just made the great play is now the first one up. And sure enough, he hits a home run.
Well the other night I'm listening to the game on the radio. Guy makes a great play. Sure enough he leads off the next inning...But the announcers say the following
Joe: "How many times have we seen it, The guy that makes the great catch leads off the next inning"
Dave: "Yup. Really what are the odds?"
Joe: "Well...One in Nine."
If you ask the question, what are the odds that the player who just made that out would lead off the next inning, that would be 1/9.
But if you ask, what are the chances that a random player would make the final out and then lead off the next inning, that would be 1/9 * 1/9, correct? Is it this simplistic?
How does this change if we ask these questions with a specific position player? How do we take into consideration the distribution of outs per position? Or frequency of at bats per position and the frequency of a specific batting order leading off an inning.
According to Elias Sports:
Here's the percentage of the time each batting order slot leads off an inning, with the top of the 1st removed for obvious reason.
1 -- 16.6 %
2 -- 9.3 %
3 -- 8.9 %
4 -- 12.5 %
5 -- 11.4 %
6 -- 10.2 %
7 -- 10.6 %
8 -- 10.6 %
9 -- 9.9 %
Considering that better players are playing more challenging positions and are more likely to be a leadoff hitter getting more at-bats
2007 Leadoff Hitters By Position, up to 6/18/2007
1. CF -- 39.4 %
2. 2B -- 21.2 %
3. SS -- 18.3 %
4. LF -- 9.1 %
5. RF -- 4.9 %
6. 3B -- 3.6 %
7. DH -- 1.5 %
8. C -- 1.0 %
9. 1B -- 0.9 %
I have yet to find a 'outs per position' number but it is probably important.
Other considerations?