50 NL : why do they do this ?

[docnuclear]

No read on villain except that he's got half the max buy in so I don't give him too much credit
I've taken the line of betting my TP no kicker out of the blind instead of check calling, Id like your advice on that too

GAME #545632349: Texas Hold'em NL $0.25/$0.50 2007-05-07 13:29:33
Table Philippolis
Seat 1: BTN ($28.55 in chips) DEALER
Seat 3: SB ($25.60 in chips)
Seat 5: BB ($50.00 in chips) Hero
Seat 6: UTG ($50.00 in chips)
Seat 8: UTG+1 ($33.85 in chips)
Seat 10: CO ($21.36 in chips)
Hero is BB

Dealt to Hero [Ks 6s]
UTG Call $0.50
UTG+1: Fold
CO: Call $0.50
BTN: Fold
Villain: Call $0.25
tHero: Check
*** FLOP *** [Kd Qd 4s] pot 2
Villain: Check
Hero: Bet $1.10
UTG: Fold
UTG+1: Fold
CO: Call $1.10
*** TURN *** [8s] pot 4.2
Villain: Check
Hero: Bet $3.00
Villain: Allin $24.00

It looks like a draw to me what do you think ?

[ship_it_trebek]

fold and move on

[PietM]

At these stakes, a massive overbet usually means the nuts. Big bets usually mean big hands, unless I have a read that says otherwise.
I think villain just caught his two pair on the turn.

[docnuclear]

well you were right he had Q8, I called and no spaede came on the river...

[GtrHtr]

I'd fold as played. Also, I would never bet the flop in a 4 way situation like this due to reverse implied odds.