ddubois
05-05-2007, 08:16 PM
I normally play 400nl and 600nl online, and I've started playing in home games where the play is so much looser and wild that I feel out of my element. I thought microstakes might be the right place to ask for advise.
Besides the standard ridiculously loose play, these games feature people playing post-flop in ways I just don't understand: Like betting 1/5th pot, effectively pricing people in to draw correctly; or like value betting hands that should only get called when behind. (On the other hands, sometimes I see someone value betting the whole way with 88 on a K9547 board, and then win at showdown. So maybe they understand their environment better than me)
Here's an example hand, where I'm concerned my conventional MSNL thinking caused me to make play that might not have been the best optimal for the circumstances: CO open shoves 15bb, I'm 90 bb deep and have TT on the button, with two loose goobers behind be, one deep-stacked. At 400nl/600nl, I would never try to 'isolate' a 16bb shove, I would just call, and if SB/BB doesn't have AK/JJ+, I should get headsup without risking more chips for those times SB/BB wakes up with a monster. But, apparently, at this game, just calling 16bb invites KTs to come along (BBV: KK6 flop).
Now I'm confused... on one hand, I want KT in the hand when I have TT, but on the other, TT fairs much better heads up when I have to fade 1-2 overcards rather than 3-4. Should I just be shoving in that spot, and let them worry about whether they want to call any two broadway?
I guess what I'm asking is, when the players are silly loose, what kinds of plays do you make that you wouldn't make at a tight table?
Do I need to start valuing hands like ATo+/KJo+ more strongly than I normally would, even though it's full ring, just because people are in with face rag so much more often?
Besides the standard ridiculously loose play, these games feature people playing post-flop in ways I just don't understand: Like betting 1/5th pot, effectively pricing people in to draw correctly; or like value betting hands that should only get called when behind. (On the other hands, sometimes I see someone value betting the whole way with 88 on a K9547 board, and then win at showdown. So maybe they understand their environment better than me)
Here's an example hand, where I'm concerned my conventional MSNL thinking caused me to make play that might not have been the best optimal for the circumstances: CO open shoves 15bb, I'm 90 bb deep and have TT on the button, with two loose goobers behind be, one deep-stacked. At 400nl/600nl, I would never try to 'isolate' a 16bb shove, I would just call, and if SB/BB doesn't have AK/JJ+, I should get headsup without risking more chips for those times SB/BB wakes up with a monster. But, apparently, at this game, just calling 16bb invites KTs to come along (BBV: KK6 flop).
Now I'm confused... on one hand, I want KT in the hand when I have TT, but on the other, TT fairs much better heads up when I have to fade 1-2 overcards rather than 3-4. Should I just be shoving in that spot, and let them worry about whether they want to call any two broadway?
I guess what I'm asking is, when the players are silly loose, what kinds of plays do you make that you wouldn't make at a tight table?
Do I need to start valuing hands like ATo+/KJo+ more strongly than I normally would, even though it's full ring, just because people are in with face rag so much more often?