PDA

View Full Version : Top two limped pot

Big Poppa Smurf
05-02-2007, 02:15 AM
Villain is 34/22/7 over 60 hands.

Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.25/$0.50 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker HH Converter (http://www.legopoker.com/hh/))

SB: $62.10
<font color="black">Hero (BB): $98.80</font>
UTG: $29
MP: $77.30
CO: $48.50
BTN: $44.75

<font color="black">Preflop:</font> Hero is dealt J/images/graemlins/heart.gif 7/images/graemlins/diamond.gif (6 Players)
UTG folds, MP calls $0.50, 2 folds, SB calls $0.25, Hero checks

<font color="black">Flop:</font> ($1.50) 2/images/graemlins/spade.gif J/images/graemlins/club.gif 7/images/graemlins/club.gif (3 Players)
SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $1.50</font>, MP calls $1.50, <font color="red">SB raises to $5</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $18</font>, MP folds, <font color="red">SB raises to $38</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises all-in to $98.30</font>

This is fine right? My thinking was he should never have a set here, because 22-77 would lead this drawy board
Peter Harris
05-02-2007, 06:33 AM
i like it goot, now race those cluuuuuubs
juggler97531
05-02-2007, 06:54 AM
given his stats i think he is able to complete in sb with any two.
there are 12 combinations of weaker two pair, and only 5 combinations of sets. Also considering possible draws i like to play for stacks.
ispiked
05-02-2007, 11:15 AM
Does an aggression factor of 7 mean this guy would min 4-bet a draw like this?
Grunch
05-02-2007, 11:52 AM
I think you're wrong about him never having a set, because this board is less coordinated than you seem to think.

That said, I think this hand is played fine.
Big Poppa Smurf
05-02-2007, 04:44 PM
Ok thanks guys. Grunch, there are two straight flush draws which is good enough for me to count as drawy.

Anyways he had 22 (no this isn't a bad beat post) which surprised the hell out of me, I thought for sure I'd be up against J2 or 72 or some draw. Just goes to show that PA-HUD is the devil, because I ruled out sets almost entirely based on his aggro level.
BoozeHound
05-02-2007, 05:36 PM
I don't think you should ever discount sets (without a specific read) when villain in first position check raises with 3 or more people seeing the flop.
trixter23
05-02-2007, 05:51 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think you should ever discount sets (without a specific read) when villain in first position check raises with 3 or more people seeing the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]
Big Poppa Smurf
05-02-2007, 05:55 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think you should ever discount sets (without a specific read) when villain in first position check raises with 3 or more people seeing the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

but I'd rather blame PA-HUD! /images/graemlins/blush.gif