NL25 to NL50

[Superman26gt]

I've logged about 6k hands on NL25.

My plan is to move up when I get to 10k.

I play at UB mostly, what are the major differences between the players at 25 to 50 though? (any site you play on)

Lastly I have ~18ptbb win rate, what is average?

[rakes.a.beach]

18ptbb is NOT sustainable. 6k is a Ralatively small sample size. With that said, I think you can beat 50NL is you can beat 25NL at even 5ptbb over 10k hands.

I think the major difference is aggression. People are super passive at 25NL, you'd get stats like 70/3/.75. At 50NL, you'd see more like 45/10/2. At 100NL, you'll see more like 35/15/3. Though all those stat lines are exploitable cuz their postflop play is bad, I'd say you have to adjst a bit to aggression at 50NL. That's all. Otherwise, it's the same game. People's plays are still very transparent.

[Zagga]

I found 50nl easier then 25nl

[CaucasianAsian29]

Prob the best compilation on moving up to NL$50

Click Me (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=6570513&an=0&page=3#Post 6570513)


Check out Pokey's great reply in this thread-this totally applys for nl$50
Click me sucka (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Board=ssplnlpoker&Number=730691 0&fpart=1&PHPSESSID=)




Then here's a great one on confidence and skill required for moving up
Click me (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=6723762&page=0&fpart=1&v c=1)



More Good stuff (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Number=5911181)

[Rollos]

From my expierience they are exactly alike except you have a few more players who try to float you.

[wall_st]

you are running pretty hot i would expect things to cool down a bit. 8-10 ptbbs is considered sustainable at 25nl, but no one really sticks around those limits long enough to get a good sample size.

UB is generally considered a rock garden. I play at stars the difference between 25nl and 50nl there is generally not much difference. Possibly more aggression at higher levels.

[Superman26gt]

Thanks for the quick responses..I really appreciate it. Thanks for the links too asian /images/graemlins/smile.gif

[Superman26gt]

I forgot to mention, this is SH. What is the average WR?

[AmonRaa]

Negative.

[thac]

lol Amon


The average winrate would probably be around 3-4 (stop kidding yourselves) and the higher end of the spectrum is around 8-12 but that is usually from a really short sample size and I would say no more than 7-8 is attainable over a decent sample (but you should have moved up by that time anyways if you're a 7-8 ptbb winner)

[jonyy6788]

[ QUOTE ]
I forgot to mention, this is SH. What is the average WR?

[/ QUOTE ]

5PTBB/100 is definitely good

[Superman26gt]

depends how many tables you play, doesn't it?

[Superman26gt]

5ptbb?? ptbb is when the box is checked right?

[matrix]

the average winrate of players who are playing $50NL is about 7 or so.

I killed it for ~18PTBB/100 over 15k ish hands last time I played 50NL. A good player would have no trouble imo beating 50NL for 10PTBB/100+ - most people move up way before they are that good tho cos if you can beat 50NL for 7 then you can almost certainly beat 100NL for ~5 ...

winrates are pretty meaningless tho until you have 100K hand sample sizes - the long run in Poker is very long.

Welcome to the forums - please take the time to check out the sticky posts at the top - especially the Essential Selection.

[prodonkey]

[ QUOTE ]
you are running pretty hot i would expect things to cool down a bit. 8-10 ptbbs is considered sustainable at 25nl, but no one really sticks around those limits long enough to get a good sample size.

UB is generally considered a rock garden. I play at stars the difference between 25nl and 50nl there is generally not much difference. Possibly more aggression at higher levels.

[/ QUOTE ]

I actually have a 64k hand sample size from the last 2 months.. I'm just over 5ptbb/100 from a combined 50/25 sample.