Prodigy54321
02-14-2007, 01:52 AM
in defense of secularism and separation of church and state, I'm sure that several times I have said something to the effect of...
...even if I were a Christian, I would be reasonable enough to see that I should not push my religious beliefs on others.
I am of course talking about things like gay marriage, etc..which I obviously see as forcing people to abide by someone else's religious beliefs.
recently though, I have been thinking a lot about this...
the only reason why I should not believe that it was perfectly alright (or even mandatory) for me to push my Christian beliefs on others through things like a gay marriage ban is that I have doubt that what I believe is actually true.
if I am like many Christians and claim that I am certain that my beliefs about he Christian god are true, isn't acting to the full extent of these beliefs mandatory?
this of course is not a problem if people are allowed and freely DO acknowledge that they simply don't know whether or not their beliefs are true, but I'm afraid that since doubt isn't exactly seen as a virtue, actions to the full extent of these beliefs is indeed justified by their apparent certainty.
unless Christians admit that they are not certain about their beliefs, how can I tell them that they should still respect other peoples' beliefs or lack thereof and refrain from imposing their beliefs on others?
It now seems to me that all I am doing by saying things like......"even if I were a Christian, I would be reasonable enough to see that I should not push my religious beliefs on others."...is attempting to trick them into thinking that this is reasonable even given their beliefs? (for the good of the world by my standards obviously)
...even if I were a Christian, I would be reasonable enough to see that I should not push my religious beliefs on others.
I am of course talking about things like gay marriage, etc..which I obviously see as forcing people to abide by someone else's religious beliefs.
recently though, I have been thinking a lot about this...
the only reason why I should not believe that it was perfectly alright (or even mandatory) for me to push my Christian beliefs on others through things like a gay marriage ban is that I have doubt that what I believe is actually true.
if I am like many Christians and claim that I am certain that my beliefs about he Christian god are true, isn't acting to the full extent of these beliefs mandatory?
this of course is not a problem if people are allowed and freely DO acknowledge that they simply don't know whether or not their beliefs are true, but I'm afraid that since doubt isn't exactly seen as a virtue, actions to the full extent of these beliefs is indeed justified by their apparent certainty.
unless Christians admit that they are not certain about their beliefs, how can I tell them that they should still respect other peoples' beliefs or lack thereof and refrain from imposing their beliefs on others?
It now seems to me that all I am doing by saying things like......"even if I were a Christian, I would be reasonable enough to see that I should not push my religious beliefs on others."...is attempting to trick them into thinking that this is reasonable even given their beliefs? (for the good of the world by my standards obviously)