.KeviN.
02-08-2007, 01:23 PM
In NLHETAP, Slansky gives 3 main reasons for attempting a c/r on the river....
1.You think opponent will bet with more hands than he will call with.
2. You have a monster and you think your opponent will bet and call a c/r, but not raise if you bet or will call a bet the size of a c/r.
3. You want to bluff
Now I rarely c/r the river online, partly bc my reads arent as sharp as live and party bc at these stakes (50NL) I take the VB line most of the time. Most of the time when I'm c/ring the river it's bc I have nothing and plan on folding, but see a fishy bet and consider the board/way it was played and figure I might just be able to take it down. I guess falls under condition #3, but most of the time it's not planned out.
Now I'm wondering how often the 6 max SSNL winners out there take the river c/r line instead of VBing? I'm thinking that sometimes I might be missing out on a little extra $ by betting out in situations where the more profitable play would be the c/r. Can anyone post some theoretical or real hands that would apply here?
1.You think opponent will bet with more hands than he will call with.
2. You have a monster and you think your opponent will bet and call a c/r, but not raise if you bet or will call a bet the size of a c/r.
3. You want to bluff
Now I rarely c/r the river online, partly bc my reads arent as sharp as live and party bc at these stakes (50NL) I take the VB line most of the time. Most of the time when I'm c/ring the river it's bc I have nothing and plan on folding, but see a fishy bet and consider the board/way it was played and figure I might just be able to take it down. I guess falls under condition #3, but most of the time it's not planned out.
Now I'm wondering how often the 6 max SSNL winners out there take the river c/r line instead of VBing? I'm thinking that sometimes I might be missing out on a little extra $ by betting out in situations where the more profitable play would be the c/r. Can anyone post some theoretical or real hands that would apply here?