View Full Version : a hand i watched at .5/1
natzucowww
02-05-2007, 08:15 PM
utg+1 (no stats, $72 stack) limps, fold, <font color="red">button (tag, $120 stack) raises to $5</font>, sb folds, bb holding 88 (tag, $120 stack) calls, <font color="red">limper rr's to $9</font>, both call
Flop: K84 rainbow ($27)
bb checks, utg+1 checks, button checks.
Turn 5 completing rainbow ($27)
<font color="red">bb bets $19</font>, <font color="red">utg+1 min rr's to $38</font>, button folds, bb . . .
Question #1 (in white)
<font color="white">if you are bb do you fold or shove? (utg+1 has 22ish left)</font>
Question #2 (in white)
<font color="white">if you are bb and utg+1 has you covered do you fold, call or shove?</font>
Antinome
02-05-2007, 09:10 PM
With the EP LRR UTG+1 is representing AA,KK. On the flop I feel I'm WA/WB. I'm not thrilled by the checking, or the minraising, but I still feel it is pretty close. If I call it is all getting in on the river anyway, and I'm indifferent to any card other than an A or 8 falling. Push, call, whatever. Without reads I'm never folding. Deeper I definitely call to avoid knocking AA out of his range, and I don't mind a cheapish showdown. Way, way deeper I might play it all completely differently.
and12006
02-05-2007, 09:19 PM
For question 1 I'd would most likely shove in because if I called it'd probley go in on the river anyways. Inless I have some big reads on villian and he has a tendancy to limp overpairs like KK I might fold.
Question 2 I'd call and call a good sized bet on the river might even raise it, I couldn't really justify going AI on the turn because I don't think AK would call you so the only two hands I could see calling are AA or KK which one has you beat. WIthout reads I'd never fold aswell.
Keyser.
02-05-2007, 09:24 PM
Go all in. Plz don't consider folding effectively the second nuts when a shortstack donk who LRR can have hands other than KK (namely AA, AK).
bsheck
02-05-2007, 10:00 PM
UTG+1 has KK. I make the hero fold.
natzucowww
02-05-2007, 11:07 PM
coo, the way the hand went down i was like yeah he def. has kk, cause why wouldn't he bet the flop w/ AA on a shortstack and then min/raise the turn. he had it, but i was interested in if laying down a set of eights is poss. here. ride on soldiers.
bsheck
02-05-2007, 11:12 PM
Did he really have it?
Keyser.
02-06-2007, 12:08 AM
[ QUOTE ]
coo, the way the hand went down i was like yeah he def. has kk, cause why wouldn't he bet the flop w/ AA on a shortstack and then min/raise the turn. he had it, but i was interested in if laying down a set of eights is poss. here. ride on soldiers.
[/ QUOTE ]
why didn't he reload preflop? why did he limp-re-minraise? b/c he's a DONK. Seriously, folding here is very bad.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.