NNNNOOOOONAN
12-01-2006, 03:47 PM
Ok, I'm not sure exactly how to pose this, but basically:
Suppose a player has a 15% VPIP. Site A offers 40% rakeback using the contributed method. Site B offers 25% rakeback using the dealt method.
Which of the two sites would be better for the player, ignoring factors like game selection among others?
Also, how would the numbers have to be adjusted to make one site a better choice for a player with a VPIP> 15% and for a player with a VPIP <15%?
I hope his question makes sense. If any of you math guys feel like figuring this out, but I explained it too awkwardly, please let me know.
ty
Suppose a player has a 15% VPIP. Site A offers 40% rakeback using the contributed method. Site B offers 25% rakeback using the dealt method.
Which of the two sites would be better for the player, ignoring factors like game selection among others?
Also, how would the numbers have to be adjusted to make one site a better choice for a player with a VPIP> 15% and for a player with a VPIP <15%?
I hope his question makes sense. If any of you math guys feel like figuring this out, but I explained it too awkwardly, please let me know.
ty