PDA

View Full Version : What % of 25NL players on the tables are 2p2?

Oranzith
11-28-2006, 04:27 PM
Lets just take FT and PS as our examples. If there are (45 + 82 respectively = 127) 6-max 25NL tables, making approximately 600 players give or take on the two biggest sites, how many of them are 2p2?
machine
11-28-2006, 04:33 PM
i play full ring and i think there are less at FR. how can you measure this? maybe a poll?
martijn
11-28-2006, 04:40 PM
At 25 NL I think its on average around 1 per table.

At 50 NL however(FT atleast) I'm seeing a huge grow in regulars/solid players, at least 2 at every table.
Oranzith
11-28-2006, 05:22 PM
thats not something good to look forward to
Phytopath
11-28-2006, 05:26 PM
Where I usually play NL50 and NL100 I really doubt there is a single 2p2'er. When I occasional play 6max NL50/100 at FTP I am suprised by the number of solid aggressive players.
AliasMrJones
11-28-2006, 05:28 PM
The correct answer is very, very few. Certainly less than 1 per table. Even most decent players you see at the tables at that level aren't 2+2.
martijn
11-28-2006, 05:30 PM
maybe I said it wrong, I meant in general, "solid" players, with +- 20 vpip and 15 pfr.
DeathbySuckout
11-28-2006, 05:36 PM
I have been playing a lot of hands in the past week at NL25 on Stars, and I haven't seen a whole lot of people that I would think of to be 2p2. There are just so many players, that it's not an issue to be worried about running into 2p2 players.Not at the micros anyway.
Shaddux
11-28-2006, 05:53 PM
[ QUOTE ]
maybe I said it wrong, I meant in general, "solid" players, with +- 20 vpip and 15 pfr.

[/ QUOTE ]
The majority of these types are bad players anyways.
Shaddux
11-28-2006, 05:54 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Where I usually play NL50 and NL100 I really doubt there is a single 2p2'er. When I occasional play 6max NL50/100 at FTP I am suprised by the number of solid aggressive players.

[/ QUOTE ]
Where do you usually play?
HotdogPoker
11-28-2006, 06:01 PM
I was actually thinking about this recently. I know a lot of the uNL players play on FT and I've considered opening an account there, but playing against other 2p2 might affect my win rates, so I haven't done that yet.

It's like the 4/180 challenge they sometimes have in MTTC. I usually just don't play the 4/180 on days they have that challenge /images/graemlins/grin.gif Which is not to say I can't hold my own, but why do it when there are easier fish to play against?

FWIW, 6max NL25 at Party is still very soft. I'm Canadian, I'm allowed /images/graemlins/cool.gif
Shaddux
11-28-2006, 06:03 PM
I play on Stars. There are a couple regulars that I have 1k+ hands against, but usually I am the only decent player at the table. I don't really care if there are a couple TAGs at the table anyways as long as the fish are there.
Yorkshire Pud
11-28-2006, 07:15 PM
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, 6max NL25 at Party is still very soft

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. Some of the play over today's 1400 hands was horrific.

If it wasn't for luck......
Phytopath
11-28-2006, 09:24 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Where I usually play NL50 and NL100 I really doubt there is a single 2p2'er. When I occasional play 6max NL50/100 at FTP I am suprised by the number of solid aggressive players.

[/ QUOTE ]
Where do you usually play?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't really want the games run over with 2p2'ers but most people here hate the site, I usually play on the iPoker network with a bunch of drooling French and Italians /images/graemlins/grin.gif