PDA

View Full Version : Paradise Poker has no intention of leaving US market


Gregg777
10-02-2006, 08:53 AM
Paradise Poker has no intention of leaving US market in short term. (http://www.gambling911.com/Online-Poker-Paradise-Poker-100206.html)

Hopefully if enough sites respond like this, Party and PokerStars won't bail out.

thetruest
10-02-2006, 09:30 AM
When exactly did stars say they were bailing out?

It's only been hearsay on these forums just like the rest of the hysteria going on in here.

Blowup Doll
10-02-2006, 09:35 AM
[ QUOTE ]
When exactly did stars say they were bailing out?

It's only been hearsay on these forums just like the rest of the hysteria going on in here.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://www.gambling911.com/Party-Gaming-Poker-Stars-100206.html

PsYcHo-ScHnAuZeR
10-02-2006, 09:35 AM
Paradise did not panic when their CEO was arrested weeks ago, and they are linked to sports betting. I think they are more likely to stick around for the US players. Good for them.

TylerD
10-02-2006, 09:37 AM
Why should we trust gambling911? Who are they?

Hamburglar
10-02-2006, 09:40 AM
haha, back to paradise for everyone.

Utah
10-02-2006, 09:43 AM
[ QUOTE ]
haha, back to paradise for everyone.

[/ QUOTE ]They were a great site back in the day with excellent customer support.

PsYcHo-ScHnAuZeR
10-02-2006, 09:44 AM
[ QUOTE ]
haha, back to paradise for everyone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't forget Planet Poker. They will be #2 soon /images/graemlins/wink.gif

DING-DONG YO
10-02-2006, 09:44 AM
And WPEX!!

thetruest
10-02-2006, 09:49 AM
wpex ftw

Gregg777
10-02-2006, 09:51 AM
[ QUOTE ]
And WPEX!!

[/ QUOTE ]

1000 bucks WPEX can't even get to a 1000 players daily by the end of the month, lol...

(Unless they make significant changes, [6max, huds, table size,] which they won't.)

Utah
10-02-2006, 09:52 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
haha, back to paradise for everyone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't forget Planet Poker. They will be #2 soon /images/graemlins/wink.gif

[/ QUOTE ]Does their software still suck??? lol

gila
10-02-2006, 09:53 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And WPEX!!

[/ QUOTE ]

1000 bucks WPEX can't even get to a 1000 players daily by the end of the month, lol...

(Unless they make significant changes, [6max, huds, table size,] which they won't.)

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll take it.

Tien
10-02-2006, 09:54 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And WPEX!!

[/ QUOTE ]

1000 bucks WPEX can't even get to a 1000 players daily by the end of the month, lol...

(Unless they make significant changes, [6max, huds, table size,] which they won't.)

[/ QUOTE ]

Please don't spread misinformation around.

They have 5 max tables as well as hand histories stored in your hard drive.

Also having 1000 players during NON peak hours.

curtains
10-02-2006, 09:55 AM
hey now he said no 6max!

Gregg777
10-02-2006, 09:58 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Please don't spread misinformation around.

[/ QUOTE ]

I said 6max.

And the last time I checked the HH's didn't have opponent's names.

PsYcHo-ScHnAuZeR
10-02-2006, 10:00 AM
Yet another thread that has turned into a WPEX marketing thread. /images/graemlins/tongue.gif

Gregg777
10-02-2006, 10:01 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Yet another thread that has turned into a WPEX marketing thread. /images/graemlins/tongue.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Has it?

I'm being critical...

oreopimp
10-02-2006, 10:04 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Why should we trust gambling911? Who are they?

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont know, Lee Jones came on here and said no desicion has been made yet. Unless they have some source inside pokerstars that says different then I dont know.

oreopimp
10-02-2006, 10:05 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
haha, back to paradise for everyone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't forget Planet Poker. They will be #2 soon /images/graemlins/wink.gif

[/ QUOTE ]Does their software still suck??? lol

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the days of US players choosing a site based on software and games might be close to over.

gila
10-02-2006, 10:07 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And WPEX!!

[/ QUOTE ]

1000 bucks WPEX can't even get to a 1000 players daily by the end of the month, lol...

(Unless they make significant changes, [6max, huds, table size,] which they won't.)

[/ QUOTE ]

You do realize that WPEX is over 1000 right now, and has been running as high as 1500 most days for probably a month?

Utah
10-02-2006, 10:07 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
haha, back to paradise for everyone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't forget Planet Poker. They will be #2 soon /images/graemlins/wink.gif

[/ QUOTE ]Does their software still suck??? lol

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the days of US players choosing a site based on software and games might be close to over.

[/ QUOTE ]It was a joke for anyone who remembers playing back then. The players told Planet their software sucks and they didnt want to listen and used proof that they were growing as evidence that players liked it. They failed to ignore that everyone was growing 100x faster than them. lol

antneye
10-02-2006, 10:11 AM
I couldn't care less about having software I like. Does it deal me cards? Will they take me as a customer? Heck, at this point I would take a text based software version as long as I can still play.

thetruest
10-02-2006, 10:15 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Please don't spread misinformation around.

[/ QUOTE ]

I said 6max.

And the last time I checked the HH's didn't have opponent's names.

[/ QUOTE ]


umm, theoretically isn't 5max better than 6max if you know what you're doing? I know most of the top players with their table selection don't mind being in games with less than 6 players and might even prefer it.

curious123
10-02-2006, 10:15 AM
[ QUOTE ]
You do realize that WPEX is over 1000 right now, and has been running as high as 1500 most days for probably a month?

[/ QUOTE ]

You've fallen victim to faulty info, they only peaked at 391 real money players (http://www.pokersitescout.com/) over the last 24 hours.

Gregg777
10-02-2006, 10:17 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And WPEX!!

[/ QUOTE ]

1000 bucks WPEX can't even get to a 1000 players daily by the end of the month, lol...

(Unless they make significant changes, [6max, huds, table size,] which they won't.)

[/ QUOTE ]

You do realize that WPEX is over 1000 right now, and has been running as high as 1500 most days for probably a month?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, you are incorrect.


Please see the following link. (http://www.pokersitescout.com/)

And this link will show you the daily peaks for the past several months. (http://www.pokersitescout.com/WPX_detail.asp)

edit: curious123 beat me to it...

thetruest
10-02-2006, 10:18 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You do realize that WPEX is over 1000 right now, and has been running as high as 1500 most days for probably a month?

[/ QUOTE ]

You've fallen victim to faulty info, they only peaked at 391 real money players (http://www.pokersitescout.com/) over the last 24 hours.

[/ QUOTE ]


umm.. i'm sorry, but that site has to be off. those all those numbers are too low.

Gregg777
10-02-2006, 10:20 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Please don't spread misinformation around.

[/ QUOTE ]

I said 6max.

And the last time I checked the HH's didn't have opponent's names.

[/ QUOTE ]


umm, theoretically isn't 5max better than 6max if you know what you're doing? I know most of the top players with their table selection don't mind being in games with less than 6 players and might even prefer it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe, but 6max is what people are used to.

I just wanted to make it ask comfy as possible /images/graemlins/grin.gif

heater
10-02-2006, 10:21 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Please don't spread misinformation around.

[/ QUOTE ]

I said 6max.

And the last time I checked the HH's didn't have opponent's names.

[/ QUOTE ]


umm, theoretically isn't 5max better than 6max if you know what you're doing? I know most of the top players with their table selection don't mind being in games with less than 6 players and might even prefer it.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is true but the downside is that 5-max tables break up much easier. At least that's been my experience.

Gregg777
10-02-2006, 10:21 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You do realize that WPEX is over 1000 right now, and has been running as high as 1500 most days for probably a month?

[/ QUOTE ]

You've fallen victim to faulty info, they only peaked at 391 real money players (http://www.pokersitescout.com/) over the last 24 hours.

[/ QUOTE ]


umm.. i'm sorry, but that site has to be off. those all those numbers are too low.

[/ QUOTE ]

umm.. I'm sorry, but the site is not incorrect.

The site gives the actual number of cash players on the site.

The statistics the sites give you are the number of seats being occupied, and also include free players and tournies.

Hellmouth
10-02-2006, 10:21 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
haha, back to paradise for everyone.

[/ QUOTE ]They were a great site back in the day with excellent customer support.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe this will give Paradise the kick in the pants it needed to get more then 3 tables at a time working.

Greg

Gregg777
10-02-2006, 10:22 AM
[ QUOTE ]
This is true but the downside is that 5-max tables break up much easier. At least that's been my experience.

[/ QUOTE ]

Definitely true.

gila
10-02-2006, 10:25 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And WPEX!!

[/ QUOTE ]

1000 bucks WPEX can't even get to a 1000 players daily by the end of the month, lol...

(Unless they make significant changes, [6max, huds, table size,] which they won't.)

[/ QUOTE ]

You do realize that WPEX is over 1000 right now, and has been running as high as 1500 most days for probably a month?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, you are incorrect.


Please see the following link. (http://www.pokersitescout.com/)

And this link will show you the daily peaks for the past several months. (http://www.pokersitescout.com/WPX_detail.asp)

edit: curious123 beat me to it...

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah, well then I take that bet back. Lol. Or I could call it a no bet on misinterpration although that might be a little white lie; but I'm sticking to it.

Gregg777
10-02-2006, 10:29 AM
lol

BruinEric
10-02-2006, 10:42 AM
[ QUOTE ]

Maybe this will give Paradise the kick in the pants it needed to get more then 3 tables at a time working.

[/ QUOTE ]

It is my understanding that the limit is four. I have played four tables at once as recently as last week.