Another interesting article with positive outlook.

[Fat Nicky]

Artlicle (http://http://www.gambling911.com/internet-gambling-bill-100106.html)

[LegallyBlind]

while this sounds great, and i really hope it is accurate. I am skeptical of this source of information, as it clearly has a bias toward online gambling and it is so far the only the source of positive news.

oh yea, and your link is broken

fixed link (http://www.gambling911.com/internet-gambling-bill-100106.html)

[Nate tha\\\' Great]

Any article that suggests that President Bush might pull a pocket veto on the ports bill doesn't pass the sniff test.

[Poker_Hoar]

[ QUOTE ]
Any article that suggests that President Bush might pull a pocket veto on the ports bill doesn't pass the sniff test.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, he passes the sniff test. Glue sniffing.

[DrewOnTilt]

[ QUOTE ]
Any article that suggests that President Bush might pull a pocket veto on the ports bill doesn't pass the sniff test.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. Don't forget that the whole reason that this ports security bill got a kick in the ass was the Dubai Ports World uprorar earlier this year. That incident was a disaster for the Bush administration. The chances that Dubya will not sign the ports bill into law are slim to none.

[MannyIsGod]

The only way that there would be a chance of vetoing this bill is if there were some form of port legislation involving stem cell research.