Minor flaw in 'everyone playing by the book'?

[DrVanNostrin]

The author didn't take into account that the probability of a player having a hand in the non-fold range is influenced by what other players have. If you raise from UTG w/27o and UTG+1 folds there is a slightly greater chance that UTG+2 will have a hand he can play back at you with. I'm not sure if this is at all significant, I just thought I'd throw it out there.

[a rebours]

I believe it is common knowledge that the "bunching effect" you described is negligible. thus, no flaw in the article /images/graemlins/smile.gif

[A_F]

[ QUOTE ]
I believe it is common knowledge that the "bunching effect" you described is negligible. thus, no flaw in the article /images/graemlins/smile.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Except that the book Small Stakes Holdem for Advanced Players does not exist.

[a rebours]

lol. missed that one /images/graemlins/laugh.gif