PDA

View Full Version : Correct Card For Planetluck


grac
06-21-2006, 07:19 PM
I am currently using this card from casinobonuswhores
http://casinobonuswhores.com/basic-strategy-s17-surr.jpg
but noticed Casino dave advises this card which is slightly different
http://www.casinodave.com/aceclublvstrip.gif

I want to make sure I am using the correct card as there are slight differences. What site should I be going to in order to ensure I use the correct strategies?

jba
06-21-2006, 07:50 PM
the one you link to for casino dave looks like it's for european no hole card BJ, pretty sure that is wrong for planetluck

pdub4285
06-21-2006, 09:04 PM
The first one from casinobonuswhores is more correct if anything. Planetluck has surrendering and the second card doesnt mention that while the first one does.

Go with the bonuswhores one.

HalvSame
06-21-2006, 09:22 PM
To add to the confusion, CBP suggests this one (http://www.casinobonuspages.com/cached/_images/512.508.lv-dtgif.crop.75a2885ca15b1f68bfaa189a2043e34a.gif) for Planetluck.

jba
06-21-2006, 09:38 PM
[ QUOTE ]
To add to the confusion, CBP suggests this one (http://www.casinobonuspages.com/cached/_images/512.508.lv-dtgif.crop.75a2885ca15b1f68bfaa189a2043e34a.gif) for Planetluck.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty sure this card is terrible

HalvSame
06-21-2006, 09:45 PM
Yeah, it doesn't look too good. For instance, it strikes me as a bit weird that you'd surrender/stand on 14vs11 but surrender/hit on 15+vs11? I actually followed it blindly on starluck today, I guess sometimes you've got to take a critical eye to these charts.

That said, I finished up 100+43, so I guess I'm not complaining. /images/graemlins/heart.gif variance /images/graemlins/tongue.gif

grac
06-21-2006, 09:45 PM
Great so much confusion, I am goin to stick with this one for planet/star

http://casinobonuswhores.com/basic-strategy-s17-surr.jpg

Maybe someone who has completed knows the best one

jba
06-21-2006, 10:01 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Great so much confusion, I am goin to stick with this one for planet/star

http://casinobonuswhores.com/basic-strategy-s17-surr.jpg


[/ QUOTE ]

this is the one I used, pretty sure it's correct

Halo7
06-21-2006, 10:04 PM
FWIW, I developed the casinobonuswhores ones by plugging in the exact rules and number of decks in use at the Blackjack Basic Strategy Engine which is at http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bjbse.php . This also jives with information from my old card counting books (Million Dollar Blackjack etc). The main diff with the CBP one is surrendering 14 vs an A which is a very very small diff. CasinoDave's one is I am sure just a web editing snafu with the wrong chart.

Halo7

jba
06-21-2006, 10:28 PM
Halo7,

unless I'm missing something about the rules 14vA and 88vA are both wrong. I think 14vA is wrong for any rules I've ever seen on the web.. with hi lo indices surrendering 14vA is correct at 4+ (same count as standing 15v9 - so yeah wrong for BS). standing 14vA is just way way off.

Halo7
06-21-2006, 10:57 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Halo7,

unless I'm missing something about the rules 14vA and 88vA are both wrong. I think 14vA is wrong for any rules I've ever seen on the web.. with hi lo indices surrendering 14vA is correct at 4+ (same count as standing 15v9 - so yeah wrong for BS). standing 14vA is just way way off.

[/ QUOTE ]

What I meant by my comment was surrendering 14 (CBP chart) vs hitting 14 (CBW chart) wasn't a big EV difference. I agree that standing on a 14 vs an A is a big mistake(if you can't surrender). The 8-8 vs A thing is something I had to do deeper research on myself, but with 4+ decks, you should be surrendering it according to most sources including the BJSE I cited above as well as http://wizardofodds.com/blackjack/appendix6.html . If you look on that page then it says with 2 decks you split 88 (and the BJSE agrees btw). If those 2 sources are wrong about 88, point me to a better one and I can update my chart hehe.

Halo7

jba
06-22-2006, 12:23 AM
halo,

I can understand surrendering on 88 it's standing that is wrong.

Halo7
06-22-2006, 01:54 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I can understand surrendering on 88 it's standing that is wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]
I see what you mean. Although you could argue that it says surrender if allowed, otherwise stand, and you would always be surrendering with 88 so you would never have a chance to stand.

I think they really need a Rphs box for surrender if available, otherwise split if available, otherwise hit if available, otherwise stand. LOL.

Halo7

jba
06-22-2006, 01:58 AM
halo,

the wiz uses "R/P" for surrender if possible else split. I think the hit is obvious enough (and you can always hit).

grac
06-22-2006, 12:36 PM
I'm using the chart and am down 60 so still up 40 with a bit of play left. I am making $2 bets how much is this really increasing my variance?

Halo7
06-22-2006, 01:06 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I'm using the chart and am down 60 so still up 40 with a bit of play left. I am making $2 bets how much is this really increasing my variance?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ummm well if you had bet $1, you would be down 30? lol. Variance is a bitch, but it can swing both ways so maybe you will swing back up before the WR is complete.

jba
06-22-2006, 01:24 PM
good info on BJ variance (http://wizardofodds.com/blackjack/appendix4.html)

grac
06-22-2006, 02:24 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm using the chart and am down 60 so still up 40 with a bit of play left. I am making $2 bets how much is this really increasing my variance?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ummm well if you had bet $1, you would be down 30? lol. Variance is a bitch, but it can swing both ways so maybe you will swing back up before the WR is complete.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is very true. Variance is variance and I understand the risk so I am cool with it.

BigDave
06-22-2006, 02:39 PM
I believe my card is the one when the no download BJ was around at Starluck and Planetluck. It obviously is not around anymore, so I have to go change my card.

Thanks for the heads up guys.