$400 bonus question

[StepBangin]

I found a site that has a $400 bonus. To clear the bonus you have to play 400 CONTRIBTUED raked hands.

I dont clear many bonuses or ever read the Internet Bonuses forum, so is this a good bonus to try and clear?

[Lawman]

*sigh* OK I'll bite:

What site?
What minimum level?
Are there additional requirements to cash out?
How much does pot have to be raked to count?

[HalvSame]

Sounds very nice. How about posting the name of the site or the entire ToC's? Specifically, I would look out for level restrictions and expiration times. Also, some sites credit the bonus to your account after X rh's, but wont let you withdraw it before Y rh's.

[StepBangin]

I emailed them about 1 hour before I posted this. They JUST emailed me back like 1 minute ago.

They basically said that I can play any level (The smallest is $0.25/$0.50 Limit and $0.25/$0.50 NL) As long as the pot is raked, then it counts as a contributed hand.

Im not going to post the name of the site yet, because an Affiliate of mine from other sites says he can get me (Or anyone) 32% to 37% Rakeback from the site. I'll wait to post more...

[boracay]

ohhh... i would avoid that site. not good bonus at all.

[grouchie]

i feel like you posted this just to tease us

[Photoc]

[ QUOTE ]

As long as the pot is raked, then it counts as a contributed hand.


[/ QUOTE ]

Incorrect. This is not contributed rake. This is attributed. You have to put money into the pot for it to be contributed.

[Lawman]

[ QUOTE ]
I emailed them about 1 hour before I posted this. They JUST emailed me back like 1 minute ago.

They basically said that I can play any level (The smallest is $0.25/$0.50 Limit and $0.25/$0.50 NL) As long as the pot is raked, then it counts as a contributed hand.

Im not going to post the name of the site yet, because an Affiliate of mine from other sites says he can get me (Or anyone) 32% to 37% Rakeback from the site. I'll wait to post more...

[/ QUOTE ]

Not wishing to be sceptical but this doesn't add up. Even the Ladbrokes deal wasn't this good.

[metsandfinsfan]

seems too good to be true usually = too good to be true

[Poker Is Life]

Thanks to you for showing me this page and the interested people. Anyone wishing for this information, I will send you a PM of a message that I have pre-written so it should have good english. This bonus is actually 100% up to $500

[ihaveAdream]

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks to you for showing me this page and the interested people. Anyone wishing for this information, I will send you a PM of a message that I have pre-written so it should have good english. This bonus is actually 100% up to $500

[/ QUOTE ]

Um, I'm lost.

[Komodo]

Why so secret???

[Poker Is Life]

[ QUOTE ]
Why so secret???

[/ QUOTE ]

they said If I post, it will gets deleted

[WiSeIVIaN]

Save your PMs people, its a 10x contributed bonus (meaning OP doesn't know how to put enough 0's in. Hence its $500 for 5000 contributed rake hands. While there are worse bonuses out there this is the equivalent of a bad prima bonus. I would guess that it wouldn't be half bad if you were playing stud, but I don't beleive the pokernexus network (which is what it is on) has that much stud traffic. If it was noncontributed this bonus would be the equivalent of a $500 betfred bonus, but since its contributed it becomes much worse. Say you have a 33 VP$IP that means that the bonus will be the equivalent of 30x noncontributed since your only contributing to 1/3 pots. It would be slightly better then that if u consider blinds, but the majority of us don't have VP$IP's that high.

Waste of a PM, have a nice day. And OP, u should learn to put enough 0's in before you make secretive posts which may lead some to beleive that you and this affiliate are the same person trying to make a quick buck with your genius idea to be 2 people on 2+2 and create a big commotion. Not saying you did, just sayin that its not unfeasable for one to think this.

BTW thank you, having to reply in this thread helped me stop playing on b2b for the moment so I wouldn't tilt away the rest of my bankroll.

[Poker Is Life]

yes, it shoul say 4000 not 400 hands