PDA

View Full Version : UB vs FT


Zarathustra888
01-17-2006, 02:28 PM
Your bankroll is $1000.

You move $400 to pacific because there is a 25% to $100 bonus available with 30% rakeback, not to mention incredibly good games.

You have $600 left and you will be playing the $50nl tables.

Do you deposit your $600 into Full tilt for the bonus and 27% rakeback.

Or do you deposit $600 into Ultimate bet for their $600 bonus but with no rakeback.

Photoc
01-17-2006, 02:48 PM
FT's NL games are much softer IMO.

PhillyEdB
01-17-2006, 03:54 PM
UB has r/b also.

Pepsquad
01-17-2006, 04:02 PM
I deposit $600 into UB WITH RB.

Zarathustra888
01-17-2006, 05:22 PM
Yea I heard about RB with UB, only after I signed up via another site, so I'll have to use another identity to sign up again.

I'll end up at UB one day so I see no problem with playing a couple tables at fulltilt for a while

cdxx
01-17-2006, 07:34 PM
is the FT bonus really tough to clear? at $.06 per rake $1. seems like shouldn't take long.

ImsaKidd
01-17-2006, 08:02 PM
C: Sign up to party (with RB if you can find it) and skip the incredibly sucky UB/FT bonii.

Mustbeblufin
01-17-2006, 08:49 PM
[ QUOTE ]
is the FT bonus really tough to clear? at $.06 per rake $1. seems like shouldn't take long.

[/ QUOTE ]

I play 2/4 and it clears pretty quick. Anything lower is painfully slow IMO.

Isura
01-18-2006, 07:01 PM
[ QUOTE ]
is the FT bonus really tough to clear? at $.06 per rake $1. seems like shouldn't take long.

[/ QUOTE ]

4 tables of 1/2 no-limit and it's not so bad.

jah7_fsu1
01-18-2006, 08:25 PM
Note that you will need to e-mail customer service to set up more than 3 tables, but they are quick and friendly to do so.